Quantifying economic benefits from free-floating bike-sharing systems: A trip-level inference approach and city-scale analysis

Abstract Despite many qualitative discussions about the benefits of free-floating bike-sharing systems (FFBS), high-resolution and quantitative assessments about the economic benefits of FFBS for users are absent. This study proposes an innovative trip-level inference approach for quantifying the economic benefits of FFBS, leveraging massive FFBS transaction data, the emerging multimodal routing Application Programming Interface from online navigators and travel choice modeling. The proposed approach is able to analyze the economic benefit for every single bike-sharing trip and investigate the spatiotemporal heterogeneity in the economic benefits from FFBS. An empirical analysis in Shanghai is conducted using the proposed approach. The estimated saved travel time, cost, and economic benefit due to using FFBS per trip are estimated to be 9.95 min, 3.64 CNY, and 8.68 CNY-eq, respectively. The annual saved travel time, cost, and economic benefits from FFBS in Shanghai are estimated to be 17.665 billion min, 6.463 billion CNY, and 15.410 billion CNY-eq, respectively. The relationships between economic benefits from FFBS and built environment factors in different urban contexts are quantitatively examined using Multiple Linear Regression to explain the spatial heterogeneity in the economic benefits of FFBS. The outcomes provide a useful tool for evaluating the benefits of shared mobility systems, insights into the users’ economic benefit from using FFBS from per-trip, aggregated and spatial perspective, as well as its influencing factors. The results could efficiently support the scientific planning, operation and policy making concerning FFBS in different urban contexts.

[1]  R. Cervero,et al.  Influences of Built Environments on Walking and Cycling: Lessons from Bogotá , 2009 .

[2]  Maria Kamargianni,et al.  Hybrid Choice Model to Investigate Effects of Teenagers' Attitudes toward Walking and Cycling on Mode Choice Behavior , 2013 .

[3]  Yongping Zhang,et al.  Environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big data-based analysis , 2018, Applied Energy.

[4]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  An approach to imputing destination activities for inclusion in measures of bicycle accessibility , 2020 .

[5]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Micromobility evolution and expansion: Understanding how docked and dockless bikesharing models complement and compete – A case study of San Francisco , 2020, Journal of Transport Geography.

[6]  Haojie Li,et al.  Effects of dockless bike-sharing systems on the usage of the London Cycle Hire , 2019 .

[7]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  An empirical analysis of dockless bike-sharing utilization and its explanatory factors: Case study from Shanghai, China , 2020 .

[8]  Mingshu Wang,et al.  Bike-sharing systems and congestion: Evidence from US cities , 2017 .

[9]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Hail a cab or ride a bike? A travel time comparison of taxi and bicycle-sharing systems in New York City , 2017 .

[10]  D. Rojas-Rueda,et al.  Health impacts of bike sharing systems in Europe. , 2018, Environment international.

[11]  Siqi Zheng,et al.  Dockless bike sharing alleviates road congestion by complementing subway travel: Evidence from Beijing , 2020 .

[12]  Cyrille Médard de Chardon,et al.  The contradictions of bike-share benefits, purposes and outcomes , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[13]  John M. Rose,et al.  Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit models , 2006 .

[14]  Elliot W. Martin,et al.  Evaluating public transit modal shift dynamics in response to bikesharing: a tale of two U.S. cities , 2014 .

[15]  Simon Washington,et al.  Bike share's impact on car use: evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia , 2014 .

[16]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[17]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  On the Use of Mixed RP/SP Models in Prediction: Accounting for Systematic and Random Taste Heterogeneity , 2011, Transp. Sci..

[18]  Juanjuan Zhao,et al.  Investigating physical encounters of individuals in urban metro systems with large-scale smart card data , 2020 .

[19]  Mark Wardman,et al.  Meta-analysis of UK values of travel time: An update , 2011 .

[20]  X. Qu,et al.  Revealing psychological inertia in mode shift behavior and its quantitative influences on commuting trips , 2020 .

[21]  Niels Van Oort,et al.  Bike-sharing systems’ impact on modal shift: A case study in Delft, the Netherlands , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[22]  Y. Ge,et al.  Why people like using bikesharing: Factors influencing bikeshare use in a Chinese sample , 2020 .

[23]  John M. Rose,et al.  Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives , 2008 .

[24]  Jen-Jia Lin,et al.  Associations of built environments with spatiotemporal patterns of public bicycle use , 2019, Journal of Transport Geography.

[25]  Xiaolei Ma,et al.  Impacts of free-floating bikesharing system on public transit ridership , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[26]  T. Toivonen,et al.  Modelling the potential effect of shared bicycles on public transport travel times in Greater Helsinki: An open data approach☆ , 2013 .

[27]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Economic Benefits of Capital Bikeshare: A Focus on Users and Businesses , 2014 .

[28]  Xi Wang,et al.  Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions reduction from bike share systems: a model considering real-world trips and transportation mode choice patterns , 2020 .

[29]  X. Li,et al.  Exploring the equity performance of bike-sharing systems with disaggregated data: A story of southern Tampa , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[30]  Yufei Yuan,et al.  A comparison in travel patterns and determinants of user demand between docked and dockless bike-sharing systems using multi-sourced data , 2020 .

[31]  Liang Ma,et al.  Bike sharing and users’ subjective well-being: An empirical study in China , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[32]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Public bikesharing and modal shift behavior: a comparative study of early bikesharing systems in North America , 2013 .

[33]  Nicole A Anderson,et al.  Portland Bicycle Share Health Impact Assessment , 2015 .

[34]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  On fitting mode specific constants in the presence of new options in RP/SP models , 2006 .

[35]  Ling-Yun He,et al.  Bike Sharing and the Economy, the Environment, and Health-Related Externalities , 2018 .

[36]  D. Ettema,et al.  Dockless bike-sharing systems: what are the implications? , 2020, Transport Reviews.

[37]  Mark Wardman,et al.  Public transport values of time , 2004 .

[38]  David A. Hensher,et al.  The Mixed Logit Model: the State of Practice and Warnings for the Unwary , 2001 .