Swelling Behaviour of Cured Urea–Formaldehyde Resin Adhesives with Different Formaldehyde to Urea Mole Ratios

As a part of understanding of the network structure of urea–formaldehyde (UF) resin adhesives, this study examined the swelling behaviour of cured UF resin adhesives with four different formaldehyde–urea (F/U) mole ratios, using Flory–Rehner thermodynamic theory and field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) to relate the swelling behaviour to consequently induce micromorphological changes. Cured UF resin films before and after acetone extraction were exposed to swelling in dimethyl sulphoxide at three different temperatures. For the first time, this study reported the experimentally determined swelling parameters, such as sol fraction (ωsol), polymer volume fraction (φp), polymer–solvent interaction parameter (χ), and the number average molecular weight between cross-links (Mc), for cured UF resin adhesives. Both ωsol and Mc decreased as the F/U mole ratio increased. But these values increased with an increase in the swelling temperature. The extraction resulted in negative ωsol values, suggesting the removal of a scattered distribution of ωsol in the cured UF resins. The micromorphology helped to explain the differences in the molecular integrity of the resins, indicating a close relationship between the swelling behaviour and the morphological changes after the swelling.

[1]  A. Nuryawan,et al.  MRT Letter: High resolution SEM imaging of nano‐architecture of cured urea‐formaldehyde resin using plasma coating of osmium , 2013, Microscopy research and technique.

[2]  A. Constantinescu,et al.  Effect of the sol fraction and hydrostatic deformation on the viscoelastic behavior of prestrained highly filled elastomers , 2013 .

[3]  V. Causin,et al.  Crystallinity and domain size of cured urea–formaldehyde resin adhesives with different formaldehyde/urea mole ratios , 2013 .

[4]  J. Sommer,et al.  Cross-Link Density Estimation of PDMS Networks with Precise Consideration of Networks Defects , 2012 .

[5]  Byung‐Dae Park,et al.  Hydrolytic stability and crystallinity of cured urea–formaldehyde resin adhesives with different formaldehyde/urea mole ratios , 2011 .

[6]  Glyn O. Phillips,et al.  Hydrogels: Methods of Preparation, Characterisation and Applications , 2011 .

[7]  S. Swain,et al.  Swelling study of superabsorbent PAA‐co‐PAM/clay nanohydrogel , 2011 .

[8]  J. Carretero‐González,et al.  Uncertainties in the Determination of Cross-Link Density by Equilibrium Swelling Experiments in Natural Rubber , 2008 .

[9]  Byung‐Dae Park,et al.  Dynamic mechanical analysis of urea–formaldehyde resin adhesives with different formaldehyde‐to‐urea molar ratios , 2008 .

[10]  Byung‐Dae Park,et al.  Effects of formaldehyde to urea mole ratio on thermal curing behavior of urea–formaldehyde resin and properties of particleboard , 2006 .

[11]  A. Bhattacharya,et al.  Studies On The Crosslinking Of Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) , 2006 .

[12]  H. Winter,et al.  Swelling Behavior of Partially Cross-Linked Polymers: A Ternary System , 2005 .

[13]  C. Hse,et al.  Formaldehyde emission and high-temperature stability of cured urea-formaldehyde resins , 2000, Journal of Wood Science.

[14]  A. H. Navarchian,et al.  Effects of NCO/OH ratio and catalyst concentration on structure, thermal stability, and crosslink density of poly(urethane-isocyanurate) , 2003 .

[15]  Antonio Pizzi,et al.  Handbook of Adhesive Technology, Revised and Expanded , 2003 .

[16]  Jack L. Koenig,et al.  A review of polymer dissolution , 2003 .

[17]  L. Matějka.  Amine Cured Epoxide Networks: Formation, Structure, and Properties† , 2000 .

[18]  R. G. Schmidt,et al.  Network characterization of phenol–formaldehyde thermosetting wood adhesive , 1998 .

[19]  M. Dunky,et al.  Urea–formaldehyde (UF) adhesive resins for wood , 1998 .

[20]  A. Pizzi,et al.  Thermomechanical analysis of entanglement networks: Correlation of some calculated and experimental parameters , 1998 .

[21]  A. Pizzi,et al.  On the correlation of some theoretical and experimental parameters in polycondensation crosslinked networks. III. Network‐constrained repeating units , 1998 .

[22]  A. Pizzi.  On the correlation of some theoretical and experimental parameters in polycondensation crosslinked networks. II. Interfacial energy and adhesion on cellulose substrates , 1997 .

[23]  A. Pizzi.  On the correlation of some theoretical and experimental parameters in polycondensation cross-linked networks , 1997 .

[24]  G. Maciel,et al.  NMR study of the stabilities of urea–formaldehyde resin components toward hydrolytic treatments , 1994 .

[25]  D. Feldman,et al.  Swelling and adhesion characteristics of lignin-filled polyurethane sealant , 1994 .

[26]  E. Ferg,et al.  The Correlation of Strength and Formaldehyde Emission with the Crystalline/Amorphous Structure of UF Resins , 1992 .

[27]  G. E. Myers,et al.  Formaldehyde Liberation and Cure Behavior of Urea-Formaldehyde Resins , 1990 .

[28]  W. Johns,et al.  A Novel Concept on the Structure of Cured Urea-Formaldehyde Resin , 1985 .

[29]  J. Koutsky,et al.  A Morphological Study of Urea-Formaldehyde Resins , 1985 .

[30]  Goro Wada.  Basicity of Dimethyl Sulfoxide in an Aqueous Solution as Measured by the Spectrophotometric Indicator Method , 1969 .

[31]  P. Flory,et al.  STATISTICAL MECHANICS OF CROSS-LINKED POLYMER NETWORKS II. SWELLING , 1943 .