Absorptive Capacity and the Adoption of MOOCs in Higher Education: The Role of Educational IT

Advanced information technologies have enabled the development of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), which have the potential to transform higher education. Why are some schools able to more easily embrace this technology-based model of teaching, while others are reluctant to jump aboard? Applying the theory of absorptive capacity, we examine the role of a school’s educational IT – including its investments in both IT capabilities and IT governance structures – in becoming a MOOC producer. Using a unique longitudinal dataset that combines the complete history of MOOC adoption by US colleges and universities, and their use of educational IT, we find that prior educational IT capabilities such as 1) the use of Web 2.0, social media and other interactive tools for teaching, and 2) the school’s prior experience with distance education and hybrid teaching are positively associated with MOOC adoption. We also find that the contribution of educational IT capabilities to MOOC adoption is moderated by IT governance practices. When the provision of educational IT supporting services are highly decentralized, educational IT capabilities have a greater impact on the probability of a school adopting a MOOC than when these services are primarily provided by the central IT organization. We discuss the implications for research and practice.

[1]  P. McAndrew,et al.  Open Learning at a Distance: Lessons for Struggling MOOCs , 2013, Science.

[2]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[3]  E. Smith.  Methods of Multivariate Analysis , 1997 .

[4]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[5]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[6]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  “ Turn on , Tune in , Drop out ” : Anticipating student dropouts in Massive Open Online Courses , 2013 .

[7]  P. V. Rao,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data , 2000 .

[8]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Bin Gu,et al.  Environmental Uncertainty and IT Infrastructure Governance: A Curvilinear Relationship , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  John Van Reenen,et al.  Americans Do I.T. Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle , 2007 .

[11]  Paul Ati ' Ewell.  TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING* , 1992 .

[12]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[13]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Strategic Alignment Between Business and Information Technology: A Knowledge-Based View of Behaviors, Outcome, and Consequences , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations , 1994, MIS Q..

[15]  Panagiotis Adamopoulos,et al.  What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention in online courses , 2013, ICIS.

[16]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Complementarity in Organizations , 2012 .

[17]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[18]  Moshe Y. Vardi.  Will MOOCs destroy academia? , 2012, CACM.

[19]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Business Competence of Information Technology Professionals: Conceptual Development and Influence on IT-Business Partnerships , 2004, MIS Q..

[20]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[21]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure , 1995 .

[22]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design , 1991 .

[23]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Money models for MOOCs , 2013, CACM.

[24]  B. R. Nault.  Information Technology and Organizational Design: Locating Decisions and Information , 1997 .

[25]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data , 2008 .

[26]  Connie M. Borror,et al.  Methods of Multivariate Analysis, 2nd Ed. , 2004 .

[27]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[28]  Michael D. Smith,et al.  Strategies for tomorrow's 'winners-take-some' digital goods markets , 2013, CACM.

[29]  Krishnan S. Anand,et al.  Information and organization for horizontal multimarket coordination , 1997 .

[30]  R. G. Fichman,et al.  Digital Innovation as a Fundamental and Powerful Concept in the Information Systems Curriculum , 2014, MIS Q..

[31]  Michael Dinger,et al.  Absorptive Capacity and Information Systems Research: Review, Synthesis, and Directions for Future Research , 2012, MIS Q..

[32]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[33]  Kay M. Nelson,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1993 THE CONTRIBUTION OF SHARED KNOWLEDGE TO IS GROUP PERFORMANCE , 2017 .

[34]  David C. Ribar,et al.  Analysis of panel data, 2nd edition , 2004 .

[35]  Henry Lucas.  Disrupting and transforming the university , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[36]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Co-evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities , 1999 .

[37]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[38]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[39]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[40]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks : Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2007 .

[41]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Intangible Assets: Computers and Organizational Capital , 2002 .

[42]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Context-Design Issue for the Information Systems Function , 1998 .

[43]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[44]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[45]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[46]  Devayani Tirthali,et al.  MOOCs: Expectations and Reality. Full Report. , 2014 .

[47]  Fiona M. Hollands and Devayani Tirthali.  MOOCs: Expectations and Reality , 2014 .