TP53 status for prediction of sensitivity to taxane versus non-taxane neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer (EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00): a randomised phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND TP53 has a crucial role in the DNA damage response. We therefore tested the hypothesis that taxanes confer a greater advantage than do anthracyclines on breast cancers with mutated TP53 than in those with wild-type TP53. METHODS In an open-label, phase 3 study, women (age <71 years) with locally advanced, inflammatory, or large operable breast cancers were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either a standard anthracycline regimen (six cycles of intravenous fluorouracil 500 mg/m², epirubicin 100 mg/m², and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m² every 21 days [FEC100], or fluorouracil 600 mg/m², epirubicin 75 mg/m², cyclophosphamide 900 mg/m² [tailored FEC] starting on day 1 and then every 21 days) or a taxane-based regimen (three cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m², intravenously infused over 1 h on day 1 every 21 days, followed by three cycles of intravenous epirubicin 90 mg/m² and docetaxel 75 mg/m² on day 1 every 21 days [T-ET]) at 42 centres in Europe. Randomisation was by use of a minimisation method that stratified patients by institution and initial tumour stage. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to TP53 status. Analysis was by intention to treat. This is the final analysis of this trial. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00017095. FINDINGS 928 patients were enrolled in the FEC group and 928 in the T-ET group. TP53 status was not assessable for 183 (20%) patients in the FEC group and 204 (22%) patients in the T-ET group mainly because of low tumour-cell content in the biopsy. 361 primary endpoint events were recorded in the FEC group and 314 in the T-ET group. In patients with TP53-mutated tumours, 5-year PFS was 59·5% (95% CI 53·4-65·1) in the T-ET group (n=326) and 55·3% (49·2-60·9) in the FEC group (n=318; hazard ratio 0·84, 98% CI 0·63-1·14; p=0·17). In patients with TP53 wild-type tumours, 5-year PFS was 66·8% (95% CI 61·4-71·6) in the T-ET group (n=398) and 64·7% (59·6-69·4) in the FEC group (n=427; 0·89, 98% CI 0·68-1·18; p=0·35). For all patients, irrespective of TP53 status, 5-year PFS was 65·1% (95% CI 61·6-68·3) in the T-ET group and 60·8% (57·3-64·2) in the FEC group (0·85, 98% CI 0·71-1·02; p=0·035). At the sites using FEC100 versus T-ET, the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (75 [9%] of 803 vs 173 [21%] of 809, respectively), and neutropenia (653 [81%] vs 730 [90%], respectively). At the sites using tailored FEC versus T-ET, the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (ten [8%] of 118 vs 26 [22%] of 116, respectively), and neutropenia (100 [85%] vs 115 [99%], respectively). Two patients died of toxicity during or within 30 days of chemotherapy completion and without disease relapse (one in each group). INTERPRETATION Although TP53 status was prognostic for overall survival, it was not predictive of preferential sensitivity to taxanes. TP53 status tested by use of the yeast assay in this patient population cannot be used to select patients for an anthracycline-based chemotherapy versus a taxane-based chemotherapy. FUNDING US National Cancer Institute, La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, European Union, Pharmacia, and Sanofi-Aventis.

[1]  R. Iggo,et al.  Field cancerisation and polyclonal p53 mutation in the upper aero- digestive tract , 1997, Oncogene.

[2]  David P Lane,et al.  p53 isoforms can regulate p53 transcriptional activity. , 2005, Genes & development.

[3]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  Alan R. Fersht,et al.  Awakening guardian angels: drugging the p53 pathway , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[5]  H. Abe,et al.  Reappraisal of p53 mutations in human malignant astrocytic neoplasms by p53 functional assay: Comparison with conventional structural analyses , 1997, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[6]  W. Reinhold,et al.  Disruption of p53 function in immortalized human cells does not affect survival or apoptosis after taxol or vincristine treatment. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[7]  M. Olivier,et al.  Impact of mutant p53 functional properties on TP53 mutation patterns and tumor phenotype: lessons from recent developments in the IARC TP53 database , 2007, Human mutation.

[8]  M. Espié,et al.  Effect of mutated TP53 on response of advanced breast cancers to high-dose chemotherapy , 2002, The Lancet.

[9]  J. Bergh,et al.  Long-term follow-up of the SBG 9401 study comparing tailored FEC-based therapy versus marrow-supported high-dose therapy. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  C. Criscitiello,et al.  Taxane-based combinations as adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  L. Holmberg,et al.  Increased p53 mutation frequency during tumor progression--results from a breast cancer cohort. , 2001, Cancer research.

[12]  P. Chappuis,et al.  Prognostic significance of p53 mutation in breast cancer: Frequent detection of non‐missense mutations by yeast functional assay , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[13]  J N Weinstein,et al.  Characterization of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway in cell lines of the National Cancer Institute anticancer drug screen and correlations with the growth-inhibitory potency of 123 anticancer agents. , 1997, Cancer research.

[14]  A Estreicher,et al.  The human tumour suppressor gene p53 is alternatively spliced in normal cells. , 1996, Oncogene.

[15]  M. Espié,et al.  Cyclophosphamide dose intensification may circumvent anthracycline resistance of p53 mutant breast cancers. , 2010, The oncologist.

[16]  M. Zucchetti,et al.  Epidoxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer: a multicentric phase I-II study. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[17]  L S Freedman,et al.  On the use of Pocock and Simon's method for balancing treatment numbers over prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. , 1976, Biometrics.

[18]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Estrogen receptor expression and efficacy of docetaxel-containing adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: results from a pooled analysis. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  R. Iggo,et al.  A rapid PCR fidelity assay. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  G. Demers,et al.  Loss of normal p53 function confers sensitization to Taxol by increasing G2/M arrest and apoptosis , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[21]  Larry Norton,et al.  HER2 and response to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  P. Chappuis,et al.  A simple p53 functional assay for screening cell lines, blood, and tumors. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  T. Bauknecht,et al.  Evaluation of Methods to Detect p53 Mutations in Ovarian Cancer , 2001, Oncology.

[24]  ほか,et al.  National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria(NCI-CTC Version 2.0) 日本語訳JCOG版の信頼性の検討 , 2004 .

[25]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[26]  L. Holmberg,et al.  The p53 gene in breast cancer: prognostic value of complementary DNA sequencing versus immunohistochemistry. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  C. Prives,et al.  Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53 , 2009, Cell.

[28]  Xueri Li,et al.  Sequential Adjuvant Epirubicin-Based and Docetaxel Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients:The FNCLCC PACS 01 Trial , 2009 .

[29]  R. Bast,et al.  Tumor marker utility grading system: a framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[30]  L. Holmberg,et al.  Worse survival for TP53 (p53)-mutated breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant CMF. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[31]  V. Rotter,et al.  Mutant p53 gain-of-function in cancer. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[32]  D. Housman,et al.  p53 status and the efficacy of cancer therapy in vivo. , 1994, Science.

[33]  Zhenhai Zhang,et al.  p53 isoform delta113p53 is a p53 target gene that antagonizes p53 apoptotic activity via BclxL activation in zebrafish. , 2009, Genes & development.

[34]  P. Hall,et al.  An expression signature for p 53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutation status , transcriptional effects , and patient survival , 2005 .

[35]  P. Hall,et al.  An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutation status, transcriptional effects, and patient survival. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  M. Espié,et al.  Exquisite Sensitivity of TP53 Mutant and Basal Breast Cancers to a Dose-Dense Epirubicin−Cyclophosphamide Regimen , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[37]  D. Berry,et al.  Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer. , 2006, JAMA.

[38]  L. Holmberg,et al.  Complete sequencing of the p53 gene provides prognostic information in breast cancer patients, particularly in relation to adjuvant systemic therapy and radiotherapy , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[39]  E. Álava,et al.  Molecular predictors of efficacy of adjuvant weekly paclitaxel in early breast cancer , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.