APPLICATION OF THE IFM FRAMEWORK FOR MODELLING AND ANALYSING SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY

Recently, the concept of an integrated function modelling IFM framework has been proposed, which aims at integrating different perspectives prominent in function modelling across disciples. It provides a clearly structured, DSM-based modelling approach. In this article, function modelling with the framework is illustrated based on an exemplary system. Furthermore, the potentials for function analysis that result from the framework’s matrix-based setup are explored. Finally, the paper discusses the implications for application of the framework in practice.

[1]  Boris Eisenbart,et al.  FUNCTIONAL MODELLING PERSPECTIVES ACROSS DISCIPLINES: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2012 .

[2]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications , 2012 .

[3]  B. K. Chakravarthy,et al.  Collaborative environment for concept generation in new products , 2002 .

[4]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[5]  Behrouz Homayoun Far,et al.  Functional reasoning theories: Problems and perspectives , 2005, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[6]  Tetsuo Tomiyama,et al.  A review of function modeling: Approaches and applications , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[7]  Claudia M. Eckert,et al.  That which is not form: The practical challenges in using functional concepts in design , 2013, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[8]  U. Lindemann,et al.  Structural Complexity Management , 2009 .

[9]  Fabio Dohr,et al.  Potentials for realising a consistent transition between functional modelling with the IFM framework and early system simulation , 2013 .

[10]  Boris Eisenbart,et al.  An analysis of functional modeling approaches across disciplines , 2013, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[11]  N. Crilly.  The roles that artefacts play: technical, social and aesthetic functions , 2010 .

[12]  Pieter E. Vermaas,et al.  The coexistence of engineering meanings of function: Four responses and their methodological implications , 2013, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[13]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Development of a Functional Basis for Design , 2000 .

[14]  Boris Eisenbart,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR COMPARING DESIGN MODELLING APPROACHES ACROSS DISCIPLINES , 2011 .

[15]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Designers : the key to successful product development , 1998 .

[16]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  Analyzing Transdisciplinary Design Processes in Industry: An Overview , 2013 .

[17]  Tetsuo Tomiyama,et al.  Functional Reasoning in Design , 1997, IEEE Expert.

[18]  N. Crilly.  Non-technical artefact functions , 2010 .

[19]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  Domain Theory, Its Models and Concepts , 2014 .

[20]  Boris Eisenbart,et al.  Adapting the IFM Framework to Functional Approaches Across Disciplines , 2013 .

[21]  Kalevi Nevala.  Content-based design engineering thinking : in the search for approach , 2005 .