Experimental time domain harmonic state estimation using partial measurements

The harmonic state estimation analysis has been conventionally developed in the frequency domain. This methodology needs to measure the amplitude and phase angle of the harmonic components of the related waveforms. This paper presents an alternative time domain formulation based on a simplified network model and Kalman filter to assess the global harmonic steady state estimation. Measurements are sampled waveforms registered by a data acquisition system. The proposed methodology has been successfully tested on an experimental electric power test system developed in the laboratory. The reported case study consists of a three phase balanced system with a nonlinear load. An under-determined measurement model case has been tested. The results have been validated by direct comparison of the state estimation response against the actual data taken from laboratory experimental measurements and have also been compared against the simulated values obtained from Simulink®.

[1]  G. T. Heydt,et al.  Dynamic state estimation of power system harmonics using Kalman filter methodology , 1991 .

[2]  Bozo Terzic,et al.  Modeling of saturated synchronous generator based on steady-state operating data , 2010, The XIX International Conference on Electrical Machines - ICEM 2010.

[3]  H. Wayne Beaty,et al.  Electrical Power Systems Quality , 1995 .

[4]  Gordon Lightbody,et al.  Power system harmonic analysis using the Kalman filter , 2003, 2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491).

[5]  K.K.C. Yu,et al.  Three-phase harmonic state estimation using SVD for partially observable systems , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Power System Technology, 2004. PowerCon 2004..

[6]  E. Acha,et al.  A Synchronous Generator Internal Fault Model Based on the Voltage-Behind-Reactance Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[7]  G. W. Stagg,et al.  Computer methods in power system analysis , 1968 .

[8]  Neville R. Watson,et al.  Subject Definition and Objectives , 2004 .

[9]  Katsuhiko Ogata,et al.  Discrete-time control systems , 1987 .

[10]  J. Arrillaga,et al.  An adaptive Kalman filter for dynamic harmonic state estimation and harmonic injection tracking , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[11]  Bidyadhar Subudhi,et al.  Ensemble-Kalman-Filter-Based Power System Harmonic Estimation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  S. Chen,et al.  An overview of power quality state estimation , 2005, 2005 International Power Engineering Conference.

[13]  Houshang Karimi,et al.  A new algorithm for optimal measurement placement, observability analysis and Harmonic State Estimation in power systems , 2013, 4th Annual International Power Electronics, Drive Systems and Technologies Conference.

[14]  G.W. Chang,et al.  Extended Real Model of Kalman Filter for Time-Varying Harmonics Estimation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[15]  Neville R. Watson,et al.  Power System Quality Assessment , 2000 .

[16]  S. Premrudeepreechacharn,et al.  An optimal measurement placement method for power system harmonic state estimation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[17]  Enrique Acha,et al.  Power Systems Harmonics , 2001 .

[18]  J. C. Das,et al.  Power System Harmonics , 2015 .

[19]  Aurelio Medina,et al.  Computation of the periodic steady state in systems with nonlinear components using a hybrid time and frequency domain methodology , 1995 .

[20]  Neville R. Watson,et al.  Review of Power Quality State Estimation , 2010, 2010 20th Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference.