Methodological application of system dynamics for evaluating traffic safety policy

System dynamics (SDs) is a methodology that can be used to understand the behavior and dynamics of complex systems over time. SD utilizes a range of tools and techniques such as influence and causal loop diagrams, computer simulation and optimization. SD has been used to facilitate the analysis of complex physical and social systems, e.g. water resources, climate change and industrial accidents. One of the key reasons for its growing popularity is that it allows policy experimentation and facilitates the discussion of 'what-if' scenarios. Within the realm of road traffic research, SD has been primarily used to examine micro level issues such as the interactions between the driver, infrastructure and the vehicle. Even though such micro level analysis are important, macro traffic safety policies can create more sustainable systems that pre-empt safety issues and reduce likelihood of traffic accidents. This paper develops two models to demonstrate how the methodology of SD can facilitate and encourage macro and meso level analysis of traffic safety policy. The first model is used to assess policy options so as to encourage the purchase of cars with higher safety ratings. The second model, is used to evaluate the impact of public transport policies on travel time and traffic safety considerations. The strength and weaknesses of the SD methodology in road transport/safety analysis are also examined. It is suggested that SD is most appropriate for formulating macro level policy as it can account for the dynamic complexity associated with the road transport system.

[1]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  Archetypes for organizational safety , 2006 .

[2]  D Chisholm,et al.  Distribution of road traffic deaths by road user group: a global comparison , 2009, Injury Prevention.

[3]  David W. Baker,et al.  A Lesson in Timing: A Nonemergency Solution to an Emergency Service Decision , 1980 .

[4]  David J. Edwards,et al.  Forensic Project Management: An Exploratory Examination of the Causal Behavior of Design-Induced Rework , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[5]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Vicious circles of parallelism , 1995 .

[6]  Daniel H. Kim,et al.  Systems Archetype Basics: From Story to Structure , 1998 .

[7]  Junyun Tay,et al.  Change Management in Interorganizational Systems for the Public , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Markus Salge,et al.  Who is to blame, the operator or the designer? Two stages of human failure in the Chernobyl accident , 2006 .

[9]  Resit Unal,et al.  Efficient methods for sensitivity analysis , 1995 .

[10]  Z. Šitavancová,et al.  Transport Research Knowledge Center , 2009 .

[11]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Time Versus Market Orientation in Product Concept Development: Empirically-Based Theory Generation , 1997 .

[12]  Kirti Bhandari,et al.  Assessment of Policies toward an Environmentally Friendly Urban Transport System: Case Study of Delhi, India , 2010 .

[13]  Rita Seethaler,et al.  Using odometer readings to assess VKT changes associated with a voluntary travel behaviour change program , 2009 .

[14]  M. Cropper,et al.  Traffic Fatalities and Economic Growth , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  M. Petticrew,et al.  What are the most effective ways of improving population health through transport interventions? Evidence from systematic reviews , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[16]  Mahir Gökdag,et al.  Injuries and fatalities in Turkish road traffic accidents , 2004 .

[17]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Modeling for Litigation: Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[18]  Natasa Rupcic,et al.  The fifth discipline-the art and practice of the learning organisation , 2002 .

[19]  Charles L. Cochran,et al.  Public Policy: Perspectives and Choices , 2007 .

[20]  Pierre Louis Kunsch,et al.  Simulation of micro-CHP diffusion by means of System Dynamics , 2008 .

[21]  Cristián E. Cortés,et al.  Modelling passengers, buses and stops in traffic microsimulation. Review and extensions , 2010 .

[22]  Margaret M. Peden,et al.  World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention , 2004 .

[23]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[24]  Jonas Eliasson,et al.  Transport and Location Effects of Road Pricing: A Simulation Approach , 2001 .

[25]  Khalid Saeed,et al.  Contract design for profitability in macro-engineering projects , 1996 .

[26]  Michel G. Bougon,et al.  CONGREGATE COGNITIVE MAPS: A UNIFIED DYNAMIC THEORY OF ORGANIZATION AND STRATEGY , 1992 .

[27]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Organizational Accidents: A Systemic Model of Production Versus Protection , 2012 .

[28]  James M. Lyneis,et al.  System dynamics for business strategy: a phased approach , 1999 .

[29]  Erik Johnsen,et al.  Jay W. Forrester: Industrial Dynamics. The M. I. T. Pres. Massachusetts Intistute of Technology and John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York, 1961, 464 sider. , 1962 .

[30]  Roger Toleman,et al.  Partnerships for Progress , 2008 .

[31]  Wim Wijnen,et al.  Valuation of road safety effects in cost-benefit analysis. , 2009, Evaluation and program planning.

[32]  Erik R. Larsen,et al.  Games for electricity traders: Understanding risk in a deregulated industry , 2009 .

[33]  Michael G.H. Bell,et al.  System dynamics applicability to transportation modeling , 1994 .

[34]  Nguyen Duc Chinh,et al.  Impact of Mandatory Motorcycle Helmet Wearing Legislation on Head Injuries in Viet Nam: Results of a Preliminary Analysis , 2010, Traffic injury prevention.

[35]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  The Effects of Design Changes and Delays on Project Costs , 1995 .

[36]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Using systems dynamics to better understand change and rework in construction project management systems , 2002 .

[37]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Bayesian Multivariate Poisson Regression for Models of Injury Count, by Severity , 2006 .

[38]  David Langley,et al.  22nd International Conference of The System Dynamics Society , 2004 .

[39]  Ling Xu,et al.  A case study predicting environmental impacts of urban transport planning in China , 2009, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[40]  Anna Morandi,et al.  [Human risk factors and injuries due to road accidents: analysis of current data]. , 2009, Epidemiologia e prevenzione.

[41]  John A. Stoop,et al.  Transport safety: Trends and challenges from a systems perspective☆ , 1997 .

[42]  Elvira Haezendonck,et al.  Transport Project Evaluation , 2007 .

[43]  Werner Rothengatter,et al.  Improving Assessment of Transport Policies by Dynamic Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2003 .

[44]  Thomas R. Rohleder,et al.  Learning from incidents: from normal accidents to high reliability , 2006 .

[45]  Andrew Ford,et al.  Estimating the Impact of Efficiency Standards on the Uncertainty of the Northwest Electric System , 1990, Oper. Res..

[46]  Kenneth Cooper Naval Ship Production: A Claim Settled and a Framework Built , 1980 .

[47]  David J. Edwards,et al.  Project Pathogens: The Anatomy of Omission Errors in Construction and Resource Engineering Project , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[48]  N. Repenning,et al.  Disaster Dynamics: Understanding the Role of Quantity in Organizational Collapse , 2002 .