Causal Influence for Ex-post Evaluation of Transport Interventions

This paper reviews methods that seek to draw causal inference from non-experimental data and shows how they can be applied to undertake ex-post evaluation of transport interventions. In particular, the paper discusses the underlying principles of techniques for treatment effect estimation with non-randomly assigned treatments. The aim of these techniques is to quantify changes that have occurred due to explicit intervention (or ‘treatment’). The paper argues that transport interventions are typically characterized by non-random assignment and that the key issues for successful ex-post evaluation involve identifying and adjusting for confounding factors. In contrast to conventional approaches for ex-ante appraisal, a major advantage of the statistical causal methods is that they can be applied without making strong a-priori theoretical assumptions. The paper provides empirical examples of the use of causal techniques to evaluate road network capacity expansions in US cities and High Speed Rail investments in Spain.

[1]  Susan A. Murphy,et al.  Monographs on statistics and applied probability , 1990 .

[2]  William R Shadish,et al.  Propensity Scores , 2005, Evaluation review.

[3]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Weak Instruments: Diagnosis and Cures in Empirical Econometrics , 2003 .

[4]  T. Speed,et al.  On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9 , 1990 .

[5]  D. Rubin Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test Comment , 1980 .

[6]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .

[7]  J. Pearl,et al.  Causal Inference , 2011, Twenty-one Mental Models That Can Change Policing.

[8]  G. Imbens The Role of the Propensity Score in Estimating Dose-Response Functions , 1999 .

[9]  P. Rosenbaum,et al.  Invited commentary: propensity scores. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization , 1978 .

[11]  D. Stephens,et al.  Quantifying Causal Effects of Road Network Capacity Expansions on Traffic Volume and Density via a Mixed Model Propensity Score Estimator , 2014 .

[12]  Joseph Kang,et al.  Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data , 2007, 0804.2958.

[13]  James M. Robins,et al.  Unified Methods for Censored Longitudinal Data and Causality , 2003 .

[14]  D. Rubin Matched Sampling for Causal Effects: Matching to Remove Bias in Observational Studies , 1973 .

[15]  D. Rubin Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[16]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data , 2008, 0804.2962.

[17]  A. Tsiatis Semiparametric Theory and Missing Data , 2006 .

[18]  D. Basu Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test , 1980 .

[19]  P. Holland Statistics and Causal Inference , 1985 .

[20]  J. Lunceford,et al.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  D. Rubin ASSIGNMENT TO TREATMENT GROUP ON THE BASIS OF A COVARIATE , 1976 .

[22]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[23]  D. Rubin [On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9.] Comment: Neyman (1923) and Causal Inference in Experiments and Observational Studies , 1990 .

[24]  J. I The Design of Experiments , 1936, Nature.

[25]  Peter J. Bickel,et al.  INFERENCE FOR SEMIPARAMETRIC MODELS: SOME QUESTIONS AND AN ANSWER , 2001 .

[26]  Keying Ye,et al.  Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference From Incomplete-Data Perspectives , 2005, Technometrics.

[27]  G. Imbens,et al.  The Propensity Score with Continuous Treatments , 2005 .

[28]  J. Robins,et al.  Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models , 2005, Biometrics.

[29]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .

[30]  D. Rubin Comment: Which Ifs Have Causal Answers , 1986 .

[31]  I NICOLETTI,et al.  The Planning of Experiments , 1936, Rivista di clinica pediatrica.

[32]  James M. Robins,et al.  On Profile Likelihood: Comment , 2000 .