Optimization of immunofluorescence methods by quantitative image analysis.

There is a growing trend towards the objective quantification of immunohistochemical staining. However, quantification has not been used previously to optimize the original published immunohistochemical methods. We present a quantitative method for analyzing immunofluorescence staining employing the Applied Imaging MAGISCAN image analysis system, which has then been used to optimize major aspects of the standard immunofluorescent staining protocols. The optimization process resulted in a method that increased specific staining up to fivefold over typical published protocols, with no increase in nonspecific staining. The method is extremely reproducible. For slides stained by a single experimenter in one batch on one day, the coefficient of variation between replicate means is 1.2%. The image analysis protocol gave a linear response with increasing antigen concentration, as determined by using purified antigen dried onto slides. The revisions to the standard protocol presented here can also be applied to nonquantitative staining. It will help users of immunofluorescence to maximize their staining and may enable the detection of previously undetected antigens.

[1]  J. Bacus,et al.  HER-2/neu oncogene expression and proliferation in breast cancers. , 1990, The American journal of pathology.

[2]  J W Bacus,et al.  Biological grading of breast cancer using antibodies to proliferating cells and other markers. , 1989, The American journal of pathology.

[3]  P. Weissberg,et al.  Active and acid-activatable TGF-β in human sera, platelets and plasma , 1995 .

[4]  E B Cox,et al.  Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies. , 1985, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[5]  H. Levin,et al.  A prospective comparison of DNA quantitation by image and flow cytometry. , 1990, American journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  A. Michael,et al.  Quantitation of antigen in tissue by immunofluorescence image analysis. , 1989, Journal of immunological methods.

[7]  M. Pepys,et al.  Enumeration of lymphocyte populations in whole peripheral blood with alkaline phosphatase-labelled reagents. A method for routine clinical use. , 1977, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[8]  Haaijman Jj Immunofluorescence: quantitative considerations. , 1988 .

[9]  J. Bacus,et al.  The evaluation of estrogen receptor in primary breast carcinoma by computer-assisted image analysis. , 1988, American journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  E. Unger,et al.  Image analysis for quantitation of estrogen receptor in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of breast carcinoma. , 1991, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[11]  A Johnsson,et al.  Evaluation of a method for quantitative immunohistochemical analysis of cisplatin-DNA adducts in tissues from nude mice. , 1994, Cytometry.

[12]  D. Sgoutas,et al.  Immunohistochemical estrogen receptor assay: quantitation by image analysis. , 1991, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[13]  J. Haaijman Immunofluorescence: quantitative considerations. , 1988, Acta histochemica. Supplementband.

[14]  H. Multhaupt,et al.  Quantitative immunohistochemistry. Theoretical background and its application in biology and surgical pathology. , 1992, Progress in histochemistry and cytochemistry.