Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers

This study among 54 Dutch teachers tested a model of weekly work engagement. On the basis of theories about the motivational potential of job resources, we predicted that teachers' weekly job resources are positively related to their week-levels of work engagement, and that week-level work engagement is predictive of week-level performance. In addition, we hypothesized that momentary work engagement has a positive, lagged effect on next week's job resources. Teachers were asked to fill in a weekly questionnaire every Friday during 5 consecutive weeks. Results of multi-level analyses largely confirmed our hypotheses, by showing that week-levels of autonomy, exchange with the supervisor, and opportunities for development (but not social support) were positively related to weekly engagement, which, in turn, was positively related to weekly job performance. Moreover, momentary work engagement was positively related to job resources in the subsequent week. These findings show how intra-individual variability in employees' experiences at work can explain weekly job performance.

[1]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism , 2009 .

[2]  Toby D. Wall,et al.  An intra‐individual test of the demands‐control model: A weekly diary study of psychological strain in portfolio workers , 2006 .

[3]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought‐action repertoires , 2005, Cognition & emotion.

[4]  Anthony R. Wheeler,et al.  The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave , 2008 .

[5]  Willem Verbeke,et al.  Using the job demands‐resources model to predict burnout and performance , 2004 .

[6]  A. van den Broeck,et al.  Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction , 2008 .

[7]  B. Fredrickson,et al.  Positive Emotions Trigger Upward Spirals Toward Emotional Well-Being , 2002, Psychological science.

[8]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources , 2009 .

[9]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire , 2006 .

[10]  A. Bakker,et al.  The job demands-resources model : state of the art , 2007 .

[11]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Over de rol van positieve en negatieve emoties bij het welbevinden van managers: Een studie met de Job-related Affective Well-being Scale (JAWS) , 2006 .

[12]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Lower Level Mediation in Multilevel Models , 2022 .

[13]  C. Clegg,et al.  A circular and dynamic model of the process of job design , 2007 .

[14]  S. Sonnentag.  Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  A. Bakker,et al.  Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study , 2004 .

[16]  W. R. Sharp,et al.  A Steering and Visualization Toolkit for Distributed Applications , 2006, PDPTA.

[17]  P. Drenth.  Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology , 1984 .

[18]  F. Damen,et al.  Taking the Lead; The Role of Affect in Leadership Effectiveness , 2003 .

[19]  Arnold B. Bakker,et al.  Towards a model of work engagement , 2008 .

[20]  P. Totterdell,et al.  Time Frames for Mood: Relations between Momentary and Generalized Ratings of Affect , 1995 .

[21]  A. Bakker,et al.  Dr Jekyll or Mr Hyde ? On the di ff erences between work engagement and workaholism , 2006 .

[22]  J. Peiró,et al.  Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: the mediation of service climate. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  A. Bakker,et al.  Doctor Jekyll or mr. Hyde? : On the differences between work engagement and workaholism , 2006 .

[24]  S. Hobfoll.  Social and Psychological Resources and Adaptation , 2002 .

[25]  B. Fredrickson,et al.  Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. , 2005, The American psychologist.

[26]  Theo F. Meijman,et al.  Specific relationships between psychosocial job conditions and job-related stress: A three-level analytic approach , 2002 .

[27]  R. Burke.  Research Companion to Working Time and Work Addiction , 2006 .

[28]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Burnout and work engagement: Do individual differences make a difference? , 2006 .

[29]  D. Xanthopoulou.  A Work Psychological Model that Works: Expanding the Job Demands-Resources Model , 2002 .

[30]  T. Meijman.  Psychological Aspects of Workload , 1998 .

[31]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[32]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[33]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Maakt arbeid gezond? Op zoek naar de bevlogen werknemer. , 2001 .

[34]  William A. Kahn.  Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work , 1990 .

[35]  Marisa Salanova,et al.  Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Dov Zohar,et al.  Effects of energy availability on immediate and delayed emotional reactions to work events. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  J. M. Carroll,et al.  On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  “Same Same” But Different?: Can Work Engagement Be Discriminated from Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment? , 2006 .

[39]  John B. Nezlek,et al.  Multilevel Random Coefficient Analyses of Event- and Interval-Contingent Data in Social and Personality Psychology Research , 2001 .

[40]  Craig J. Russell,et al.  Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling to Examine Dynamic Performance Criteria Over Time , 1997 .

[41]  Adam B. Butler,et al.  Extending the demands‐control model: A daily diary study of job characteristics, work‐family conflict and work‐family facilitation , 2005 .

[42]  K. Daniels.  Rethinking job characteristics in work stress research , 2006 .

[43]  James K. Harter,et al.  Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  J. Dutton,et al.  Crafting a Job: Revisioning Employees as Active Crafters of Their Work , 2001 .

[45]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect and decision making. , 1993 .

[46]  S. Hobfoll.  Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[47]  D. Beal,et al.  An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  A. Bakker,et al.  Flow at Work: Evidence for an Upward Spiral of Personal and Organizational Resources* , 2006 .

[49]  Douglas R. May,et al.  The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work , 2004 .

[50]  R. Ryan,et al.  On energy, personality, and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. , 1997, Journal of personality.

[51]  Cynthia D. Fisher,et al.  A Within-Person Examination of Correlates of Performance and Emotions While Working , 2004, Emotion and Performance.

[52]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[53]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Handbook of emotions, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[54]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[55]  Despoina Xanthopoulou,et al.  Working in the sky: a diary study on work engagement among flight attendants. , 2008, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[56]  Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben,et al.  A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. , 2010 .

[57]  A. Bakker,et al.  Job Resources Boost Work Engagement, Particularly When Job Demands Are High , 2007 .

[58]  B. Fredrickson.  The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[59]  A. Bakker,et al.  The conceptualization and measurement of work engagement , 2010 .

[60]  John Schaubroeck,et al.  A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. , 1988 .

[61]  D. Cicchetti.  Emotion and Adaptation , 1993 .

[62]  B. Schneider,et al.  The Meaning of Employee Engagement , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[63]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Multilevel Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[64]  D. Watson.  Mood and temperament , 2000 .

[65]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[66]  Sabine Sonnentag,et al.  Not all days are created equal : the concept of state work engagement , 2010 .

[67]  A. Bakker,et al.  Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology , 2008, Bioscience trends.

[68]  A. Bakker,et al.  Burnout and Work Engagement among Teachers. , 2006 .

[69]  E. Deci,et al.  The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality , 1985 .

[70]  P. Totterdell,et al.  Special section on diary studies in work psychology , 2005 .

[71]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Belief and feeling: evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[72]  G. Towl.  Editorial , 2012, Evidence Based Mental Health.

[73]  Daniel J. Svyantek,et al.  Person–Organization Fit and Contextual Performance: Do Shared Values Matter☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[74]  A. Bakker,et al.  Dual processes at work in a call centre: An application of the job demands – resources model , 2003 .