A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum

Abstract This study pursues external validation of contingent valuation by comparing survey results with the voting outcome of a Corvallis, Oregon, referendum to fund a riverfront improvement project through increased property taxes. Survey respondents hypothetically make a voting decision—with no financial consequences—on the upcoming referendum. The survey sample consists of respondents verified to have voted in the election. We use available precinct-level election data to compare the proportion of “yes” survey and referendum votes as well as estimate voting models and mean willingness to pay (WTP) based on the two sets of data. We find that survey responses match the actual voting outcome and WTP estimates based on the two are not statistically different. Contrary to similar studies, our statistical results do not depend on re-coding the majority of “undecided” survey responses to “no.” Furthermore, such a re-coding of responses may be inappropriate for our data set .

[1]  Leonard A. Shabman,et al.  Searching for the Correct Benefit Estimate: Empirical Evidence for an Alternative Perspective , 1996 .

[2]  Paul R. Portney,et al.  The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care , 1994 .

[3]  Philip E. Graves,et al.  Valuing Public Goods , 2003 .

[4]  I. Crespi.  Manipulating public opinion , 1976 .

[5]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? , 1979 .

[6]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods , 1995 .

[7]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods , 1997 .

[8]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Provision Point Mechanisms and Field Validity Tests of Contingent Valuation , 2002 .

[9]  R. Berrens,et al.  Applying contingent valuation in the design of fee hunting programs: Pheasant hunting in oregon revisited , 1998 .

[10]  Joe Kerkvliet,et al.  A Randomized Response Approach to Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1997 .

[11]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  Efficient Estimation Methods for "Closed-ended' Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1987 .

[12]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  AGGREGATE TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FROM DISAGGREGATED BEHAVIORAL MODELS , 1975 .

[13]  K. A. Smith.  Referendum Design and Contingent Valuation: The NOAA Panel''s , 1998 .

[14]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible? , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible? A comment , 1999, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Incentive Compatible Referenda and the Valuation of Environmental Goods , 1998, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[17]  Mark Dickie,et al.  Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative Study , 1987 .

[18]  Christian A. Vossler,et al.  Externally validating contingent valuation: an open-space survey and referendum in Corvallis, Oregon , 2003 .

[19]  John A. List,et al.  Calibration of the difference between actual and hypothetical valuations in a field experiment , 1998 .

[20]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? , 1995 .

[21]  R. Berrens,et al.  Addressing Negative Willingness to Pay in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 2001 .

[22]  Mary Jo Kealy,et al.  Reliability and predictive validity of contingent values: Does the nature of the good matter? , 1990 .

[23]  J. Herriges,et al.  Valuing Recreation and the Environment: Revealed Preference Methods in Theory and Practice, New Horizons in Environmental Economics , 1999 .

[24]  Michael Creel,et al.  Comparing benefit estimates from travel cost and contingent valuation using confidence intervals for Hicksian welfare measures , 1991 .

[25]  D. Bromley.  Handbook of environmental economics , 1995 .

[26]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[27]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same? , 2002 .

[28]  Analysis of “Don't Know” Responses to Referendum Contingent Valuation Questions , 1998, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[29]  Hua Wang,et al.  Treatment of “Don't-Know” Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Random Valuation Model , 1997 .