Liberellas versus Konservatives: Social Status, Ideology, and Birth Names in the United States Paper presented at the 2013 Midwestern Political Science Association Annual Meeting

Despite much public speculation, there is little scholarly research on whether or how ideology shapes American consumer behavior. Borrowing from previous studies, we theorize that ideology is associated with different forms of taste and conspicuous consumption: liberals are more drawn to indicators of “cultural capital” while conservatives favor more explicit signs of “economic capital”. These ideas are tested using birth certificate, U.S. Census, and voting records from California in 2004. We find strong differences in birth naming practices related to race, economic status, and ideology. Although higher status mothers of all races favor more popular birth names, higher status, white liberal mothers more often choose uncommon, culturally obscure birth names. White liberals also favor birth names with “softer, feminine” sounds while conservatives favor names with “harder, masculine” phonemes. These findings have significant implications for both studies of consumption and debates about ideology and political fragmentation in the United States.

[1]  Bethany Bryson,et al.  Anything but heavy metal : Symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes , 1996 .

[2]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  Networks in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[3]  Thorstein Veblen,et al.  The theory of the leisure class : an economic study of institutions , 1953 .

[4]  N. Bowles.  American exceptionalism: a double-edged sword , 1996 .

[5]  Betsy Rymes.  A Matter of Taste: How Names, Fashions, and Culture Change. , 2003 .

[6]  Kyle L. Saunders,et al.  Is Polarization a Myth? , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[7]  Cecilia,et al.  Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal ? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination , 2007 .

[8]  David N. Figlio.  Names, Expectations and the Black-White Test Score Gap , 2005 .

[9]  S. Lipset,et al.  American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword , 1997 .

[10]  M. Lamont,et al.  CULTURAL CAPITAL: ALLUSIONS, GAPS AND GLISSANDOS IN RECENT THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENTS* , 1988 .

[11]  Christopher Ellis,et al.  Ideology in America , 2012 .

[12]  Jay M. Handelman,et al.  Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology , 2004 .

[13]  Jaime L. Napier,et al.  Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  R. Edwards,et al.  What's in a Name? An Exploration of the Significance of Personal Naming of ‘Mixed’ Children for Parents from Different Racial, Ethnic and Faith Backgrounds , 2008 .

[15]  S. Feldman.  Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: the Role of Core Beliefs and Values , 1988 .

[16]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[17]  David Brooks,et al.  On Paradise Drive: How We Live Now (And Always Have) in the Future Tense , 2004 .

[18]  J. Carbone,et al.  Red Families v. Blue Families: Legal Polarization and the Creation of Culture , 2010 .

[19]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Elizabeth and John: sound patterns of men's and women's names , 1990, Journal of Linguistics.

[20]  B. Douglas Bernheim,et al.  Veblen Effects in a Theory of Conspicuous Consumption , 1996 .

[21]  Ioana Boghian.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste , 2013 .

[22]  S. Brint.  THE POLITICAL ATTITUDES OF PROFESSIONALS , 1985 .

[23]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting , 1997 .

[24]  John Gerring,et al.  Ideology: A Definitional Analysis , 1997 .

[25]  Willard A. Mullins.  On the Concept of Ideology in Political Science , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[26]  A. Hamby.  Liberalism and Its Challengers: From F.D.R. to Bush , 1985 .

[27]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America , 2004 .

[28]  Jeffrey S. Friedman.  Democratic competence in normative and positive theory: Neglected implications of “the nature of belief systems in mass publics” , 2006 .

[29]  I. Balderjahn,et al.  Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns , 1988 .

[30]  Neil Gross,et al.  The Contemporary American Conservative Movement , 2011 .

[31]  S. Lieberson,et al.  DISTINCTIVE AFRICAN AMERICAN NAMES: AN EXPERIMENTAL, HISTORICAL, AND LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF INNOVATION* , 1995 .

[32]  R. Peterson,et al.  CHANGING HIGHBROW TASTE: FROM SNOB TO OMNIVORE* , 1996 .

[33]  L. Hartz,et al.  The Liberal Tradition in America , 2018, The Historian and the Climate of Opinion.

[34]  James A. Stimson,et al.  Ideology in America: Index , 2012 .

[35]  George Lakoff,et al.  Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think, 2nd ed. , 2002 .

[36]  Ronald F. Ferguson.  Teachers' Perceptions and Expectations and the Black-White Test Score Gap , 2003 .

[37]  G. Lakoff.  Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think , 1996 .

[38]  Giacomo Corneo,et al.  On relative wealth effects and the optimality of growth , 1997 .

[39]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Inferring gender from name phonology. , 1999 .

[40]  Herbert Blumer,et al.  Fashion: From Class Differentiation to Collective Selection , 1969 .

[41]  P. J. Conover,et al.  The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications. , 1981 .

[42]  Bill Bishop,et al.  The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart , 2008 .

[43]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores The Hidden Side Of Everything PDF , 2015 .

[44]  Pedro M. Valero-Mora,et al.  ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis , 2010 .

[45]  D. Holt.  Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption , 1998 .

[46]  P. Converse.  The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics , 2004 .

[47]  O. Gurova.  Ideology of Consumption in Soviet Union: From Asceticism to the Legitimating of Consumer Goods , 2006 .