Four faces of educational organizations

This article attempts to explore the presumed distinctive character of educational organizations. This is done by explicating and proposing an integration of four organizational models. The models are called: the rational-, the political-, the social system-, and the anarchistic model, respectively. A basic assumption is that the models represent four complementary dimensions of organizations, rather than four mutually exclusive alternatives. A typology is outlined, indicating a set of conditions under which the four dimensions are assumed to be differently salient. In conclusion, it is argued that educational organizations may be conceived of as involving an interplay of four dimensions characterized by the keywords: truth (the rational dimension), trust (the social dimension), power (the political dimension), and foolishness (the anarchistic dimension).

[1]  David Braybrooke,et al.  A Strategy of Decision, Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. , 1964 .

[2]  O. Holsti,et al.  Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1972 .

[3]  R. Schmuck.  Organization development in schools , 1970 .

[4]  W. Bennis,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[5]  O. Banks.  The sociology of education , 1969 .

[6]  J. March.  Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[7]  S. Sarason.  Revisiting "The culture of the school and the problem of change" , 1971 .

[8]  J. K. Benson,et al.  Innovation and Crisis in Organizational Analysis , 1976 .

[9]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[10]  A. Pettigrew.  The politics of organizational decision-making , 1973 .

[11]  J. March.  Footnotes To Organizational Change , 1980 .

[12]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[13]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[14]  C. Lindblom.  THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[15]  P. Halmos,et al.  The teacher, the school and the task of management , 1974 .

[16]  Fred Katz,et al.  The School as a Complex Social Organization: A CONSIDERATION OF PATTERNS OF AUTONOMY , 1964 .

[17]  J. Victor Baldridge,et al.  Power and conflict in the university , 1971 .

[18]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[19]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[20]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Decision Making as a Political Process: The Case of a UniversityBudget. , 1974 .

[21]  Michael X Cohen.  Leadership and ambiguity: the American college president, , 1974 .

[22]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Ambiguity and choice in organizations , 1976 .

[23]  Graham Allison,et al.  Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1972 .

[24]  Petro Georgiou,et al.  The Goal Paradigm and Notes Towards a Counter Paradigm , 1973 .

[25]  Joseph B. Giacquinta,et al.  Implementing organizational innovations : a sociological analysis of planned educational change , 1971 .

[26]  C. Argyris,et al.  Learning From Changing: Organizational Diagnosis and Development , 1975 .

[27]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[28]  M. Miles,et al.  Organization Development in Schools: The State of the Art , 1980 .

[29]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[30]  Gunnar Berg.  Skolan som organisation : en analys av skolans organisatoriska struktur i ett förändringsperspektiv : slutrapport från SÖ-projektet "Modeller för lokal utvecklingsplanering och utvärdering" (projekt 6041) , 1981 .