Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance

Two types of mechanisms have dominated theoretical accounts of efficient visual search. The first are bottom-up processes related to the characteristics of retinotopic feature maps. The second are topdown mechanisms related to feature selection. To expose the potential involvement of other mechanisms, we introduce a new search paradigm whereby a target is defined only in a context-dependent manner by multiple conjunctions of feature dimensions. Because targets in a multiconjunction task cannot be distinguished from distractors either by bottom-up guidance or top-down guidance, current theories of visual search predict inefficient search. While inefficient search does occur for the multiple conjunctions of orientation with color or luminance, we find efficient search for multiple conjunctions of luminance/size, luminance/shape, and luminance/topology. We also show that repeated presentations of either targets or a set of distractors result in much faster performance and that bottom-up feature extraction and top-down selection cannot account for efficient search on their own. In light of this, we discuss the possible role of perceptual organization in visual search. Furthermore, multiconjunction search could provide a new method for investigating perceptual grouping in visual search.

[1]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  The role of priming in conjunctive visual search , 2002, Cognition.

[2]  W. D. Ross,et al.  A Neural Theory of Attentive Visual Search : Interactions of Boundary , Surface , Spatial , and Object Representations By : Stephen Grossberg , 2004 .

[3]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.

[4]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Just Say No: How Are Visual Searches Terminated When There Is No Target Present? , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  J. Beck Organization and representation in perception , 1982 .

[6]  I. Rock,et al.  Perceptual organization and attention , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  H. Egeth,et al.  Goal-directed guidance of attention: evidence from conjunctive visual search. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[9]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  J. Lund,et al.  Intrinsic laminar lattice connections in primate visual cortex , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  Object selection based on oscillatory correlation , 1999, Neural Networks.

[12]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Area activation: a computational model of saccadic selectivity in visual search , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  G. Kanizsa,et al.  Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception , 1979 .

[14]  J. Allman,et al.  Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[17]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[19]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Parallel search for a conjunction of contrast polarity and shape , 1994, Vision Research.

[20]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[21]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[22]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[23]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Perceptual Grouping and Motion Coherence in Visual Search , 1999 .

[24]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  B. Julesz Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[26]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Surfaces versus features in visual search , 1992, Nature.

[28]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[30]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher level vision , 1995 .

[31]  A. Treisman Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  L Chen,et al.  Topological structure in visual perception. , 1982, Science.

[34]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  S. Palmer,et al.  Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Second-order parallel processing: visual search for the odd item in a subset. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  R. Kimchi Uniform connectedness and grouping in the perceptual organization of hierarchical patterns. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  S. Zeki A vision of the brain , 1993 .

[39]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Visual Feature Integration in a World of Objects , 1995 .

[40]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[41]  B. Gibson,et al.  Must Figure-Ground Organization Precede Object Recognition? An Assumption in Peril , 1994 .

[42]  U. Neisser VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[43]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  AÂ rni KristjaÂnsson Rapid learning in attention shifts : A review , 2005 .

[45]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.