Sensitivity to scene motion for phases of head yaws

In order to better understand how scene motion is perceived in immersive virtual environments and to provide guidelines for designing more useable systems, we measured sensitivity to scene motion for different phases of quasi-sinusoidal head yaw motions. We measured and compared scene-velocity thresholds for nine subjects across three conditions: visible <u>W</u>ith head rotation (W) where the scene is presented during the center part of sinusoidal head yaws and the scene moves in the same direction the head is rotating, visible <u>A</u>gainst head rotation (A) where the scene is presented during the center part of sinusoidal head yaws and the scene moves in the opposite direction the head is rotating, and visible at the <u>E</u>dge of head rotation (E) where the scene is presented at the extreme of sinusoidal head yaws and the scene moves during the time that head direction changes. The W condition had a significantly higher threshold (decreased sensitivity) than both the E and A conditions. The median threshold for the W condition was 2.1 times the A condition and 1.5 times the E condition. We did not find a significant difference between the E and A conditions, although there was a trend for the A thresholds to be less than the E thresholds. An Equivalence Test showed the A and E thresholds to be statistically equivalent. Our results suggest the phase of user's head yaw should be taken into account when inserting additional scene motion into immersive virtual environments if one does not want users to perceive that motion. In particular, there is much more latitude for artificially and imperceptibly rotating a scene, as in Razzaque's redirecting walking technique, in the same direction of head yaw than against the direction of yaw. The implications for maximum end-to-end latency in a head-mounted display is that users are less likely to notice latency when beginning a head yaw (when the scene moves with the head) than when slowing down a head yaw (when the scene moves against the head) or when changing head direction (when the head is near still and scene motion due to latency is maximized).

[1]  Bernard D. Adelstein,et al.  Discrimination of changes in latency during head movement , 1999, HCI.

[2]  Richard L. Holloway,et al.  Registration Error Analysis for Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  Robert S. Allison,et al.  Tolerance of temporal delay in virtual environments , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2001.

[4]  Jerome H. Kravitz,et al.  The measurement of the constancy of visual direction and of its adaptation , 1965 .

[5]  Mark H. Draper,et al.  The adaptive effects of virtual interfaces: vestibulo-ocular reflex and simulator sickness , 1998 .

[6]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Psychophysical isolation of movement sensitivity by removal of familiar position cues , 1981, Vision Research.

[7]  Bernard D. Adelstein,et al.  Head Tracking Latency in Virtual Environments: Psychophysics and a Model , 2003 .

[8]  R. So,et al.  Effects of lags on human operator transfer functions with head-coupled systems. , 1995, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[9]  Bernard D. Adelstein,et al.  Latency Discrimination Mechanisms in Virtual Environments: Velocity and Displacement Error Factors , 2005 .

[10]  H. Wallach.  Perceiving a stable environment when one moves. , 1987, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  M. Whitton,et al.  Effect of latency on presence in stressful virtual environments , 2003, IEEE Virtual Reality, 2003. Proceedings..

[12]  Maninder K. Kahlon,et al.  Visual Motion Analysis for Pursuit Eye Movements in Area MT of Macaque Monkeys , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Michael I. Hill,et al.  Generalizeability of Latency Detection in a Variety of Virtual Environments , 2004 .

[14]  R. Loose,et al.  Velocity Not Acceleration of Self-Motion Mediates Vestibular – Visual Interaction , 2001, Perception.

[15]  Timo Ropinski,et al.  Moving Towards Generally Applicable Redirected Walking , 2008 .

[16]  Bernard D. Adelstein,et al.  Perception of image motion during head movement , 2006, APGV '06.

[17]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[18]  T. Brandt,et al.  Object-motion detection affected by concurrent self-motion perception: Psychophysics of a new phenomenon , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Li Li,et al.  Suppression Of Head-referenced Image Motion During Head Movement. , 2006 .

[21]  Katerina Mania,et al.  Perceptual sensitivity to head tracking latency in virtual environments with varying degrees of scene complexity , 2004, APGV '04.

[22]  Sharif Razzaque,et al.  Redirected Walking , 2001, Eurographics.

[23]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Evaluation of Reorientation Techniques for Walking in Large Virtual Environments , 2008, 2008 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.