Behavioral and emotional consequences of brief delays in human-computer interaction

It was thought that computer-performance-related problems in human-computer interaction (HCI) would become negligible with the constant increase in computing power. However, despite major advances in computer technology, contemporary HCI is still characterized by brief delays in computer responsiveness caused, for example, by background processes or network delays. Research on long system-response times (SRTs) indicates that delays may have negative behavioral and emotional consequences. However, there are fundamental differences between previously researched long SRTs and delays as they occur in contemporary HCI, such as different timings and occurrence probabilities. Therefore the previous research is not necessarily applicable to modern HCIs. We developed a paradigm aimed at mimicking important aspects of contemporary HCI to empirically test the effects of sporadic brief delays with an average duration of 1.6s. Results showed performance decrements in the response directly following a delay in terms of increased reaction times and error rates. Furthermore, blocks in which delays occurred were less liked than blocks without delays, suggesting that delays may affect the emotional state. The data provide evidence that delays cause a significant deterioration of performance, and indicates that delays in contemporary HCI may negatively affect work productivity, work satisfaction, and health-and-safety. Suggestions for HCI design and the relationship to user interruption are discussed.

[1]  C McFarlaneDaniel,et al.  The scope and importance of human interruption in human-computer interaction design , 2002 .

[2]  James R. Lewis,et al.  Effect of Auditory Waiting Cues on Time Estimation in Speech Recognition Telephony Applications , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  T. W. Butler Computer response time and user performance during data entry , 1984, AT&T Bell Laboratories Technical Journal.

[4]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  The world wide wait: effects of delays on user performance , 2000 .

[5]  F. Zijlstra,et al.  Temporal factors in mental work: Effects of interrupted activities , 1999 .

[6]  G. J. Boggs,et al.  Computer System Response Time and Psychophysiological Stress II* , 1982 .

[7]  W Kuhmann,et al.  Experimental investigation of psychophysiological stress-reactions induced by different system response times in human-computer interaction. , 1987, Ergonomics.

[8]  Daniel C. McFarlane,et al.  Comparison of Four Primary Methods for Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Werner Kuhmann,et al.  System response time and readiness for task execution the optimum duration of inter-task delays , 1997 .

[10]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Response time and display rate in human performance with computers , 1984, CSUR.

[11]  Melanie D. Polkosky,et al.  Effect of Auditory Waiting Cues on Time Estimation in Speech Recognition Telephony Applications , 2002 .

[12]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. , 1988 .

[14]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution , 2004, CHI.

[15]  Florian Schaefer,et al.  The Effect of System Response Times on Temporal Predictability of Work Flow in Human-Computer Interaction , 1990 .

[16]  Lawrence M. Schleifer,et al.  International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction , 2009 .

[17]  Gary L. Dannenbring System response time and user performance , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[18]  W. McD. Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie , 1902, Nature.

[19]  Kara A. Latorella,et al.  The Scope and Importance of Human Interruption in Human-Computer Interaction Design , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  K. Dieussaert,et al.  Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the cognitive science society , 2004 .

[21]  M. Csíkszentmihályi The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. , 1988 .

[22]  M. Cole Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. , 1976 .

[23]  Christopher A. Monk,et al.  The Attentional Costs of Interrupting Task Performance at Various Stages , 2002 .

[24]  Christopher A. Monk,et al.  Very Brief Interruptions Result in Resumption Cost , 2004 .

[25]  Jan L. Guynes Impact of system response time on state anxiety , 1988, CACM.

[26]  Albert R. Brinkman,et al.  System Response Time and Problem Solving Behavior , 1981 .

[27]  Daniel C. McFarlane,et al.  Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction , 1999, INTERACT.

[28]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  System response time operator productivity, and job satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[29]  O Kohlisch,et al.  [Effect of system-related work interruptions in computer-assisted text processing: a field study]. , 1991, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie.

[30]  W Kuhmann,et al.  [Effects of waiting times within simple problems: an analogy to waiting times in human-computer interaction]. , 1990, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie.

[31]  Murray S. Miron,et al.  Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning , 1975 .

[32]  J. Russell,et al.  Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions , 1977 .