Diverse Perspectives on the Groupthink Theory – A Literary Review

This article provides a summary of research related to the groupthink theory. The review includes case studies, experimental studies, literature reviews, example applications, and proposed modifications to the groupthink theory. Groupthink has been applied to a broad spectrum of group settings and is seen as a major factor in many poor decisions. Despite close to 40 years of the existence of the groupthink theory, experimental studies are limited with only a few of the model‘s 24 variables adequately tested. Testing limitations, and their mixed experimental results, lead to a wide diversity of perspectives regarding the model. Some conclude groupthink is no better than a myth, while others believe it is a brilliant construct. One recommendation is to address the ambiguity of the model; implementing previously proposed modifications (identified in this article) would achieve this objective. A further recommendation is to increase focus on testing groupthink prevention steps.

[1]  P. Paulus,et al.  Developing Consensus about Groupthink after All These Years. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[2]  Kramer,et al.  Revisiting the Bay of Pigs and Vietnam Decisions 25 Years Later: How Well Has the Groupthink Hypothesis Stood the Test of Time? , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[3]  David Ahlstrom,et al.  Groupthink and France's defeat in the 1940 campaign , 2009 .

[4]  S. Yetiv.  Groupthink and the Gulf Crisis , 2003 .

[5]  Carrie R. Leana.  A Partial Test of Janis' Groupthink Model: Effects of Group Cohesiveness and Leader Behavior on Defective Decision Making , 1985 .

[6]  Randall S. Peterson,et al.  Assessing political group dynamics : a test of the groupthink model , 1992 .

[7]  Joan L. Duda,et al.  Can High Group Cohesion Be Harmful? , 2009 .

[8]  Robert D. Dimitroff,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Disaster: A study of conflict at NASA , 2005 .

[9]  F. Erdem,et al.  Optimal trust and teamwork: from groupthink to teamthink , 2003 .

[10]  Richard M. Sorrentino,et al.  Groupthink and uncertainty orientation: Personality differences in reactivity to the group situation. , 1997 .

[11]  Thomas R. Hensley,et al.  Victims of Groupthink , 1986 .

[12]  Marc D. Street.  Groupthink , 1997 .

[13]  J. K. Esser,et al.  Groupthink and the space shuttle Challenger accident: Toward a quantitative case analysis. , 1989 .

[14]  Matie L. Flowers.  A laboratory test of some implications of Janis's groupthink hypothesis. , 1977 .

[15]  A. S. Ko,et al.  Organizational communications in Hong Kong: a cultural approach to groupthink , 2005 .

[16]  D. Klein,et al.  Groupthink in Academia: Majoritarian Departmental Politics and the Professional Pyramid , 2009 .

[17]  J. K. Esser,et al.  Effects of dominance on group decision making: toward a stress-reduction explanation of groupthink. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Esser,et al.  Alive and Well after 25 Years: A Review of Groupthink Research. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[19]  E. Fodor,et al.  The power motive as an influence on group decision making. , 1982 .

[20]  McCauley,et al.  Group Dynamics in Janis's Theory of Groupthink: Backward and Forward. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[21]  M. Scharff.  Understanding WorldCom's Accounting Fraud: Did Groupthink Play a Role? , 2005 .

[22]  F. Wiebe,et al.  Toward a Process Theory of Groupthink , 1996 .

[23]  Christopher P. Neck,et al.  Groupthink Remodeled: The Importance of Leadership, Time Pressure, and Methodical Decision-Making Procedures , 1995 .

[24]  J. K. Esser,et al.  Groupthink: Effects of cohesiveness and problem-solving procedures on group decision making , 1984 .

[25]  Miriam Solomon,et al.  Groupthink versus The Wisdom of Crowds: The Social Epistemology of Deliberation and Dissent , 2006 .

[26]  Christopher F. Karpowitz,et al.  Deliberative Democracy and Inequality: Two Cheers for Enclave Deliberation among the Disempowered , 2009 .

[27]  Whyte,et al.  Recasting Janis's Groupthink Model: The Key Role of Collective Efficacy in Decision Fiascoes. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[28]  Steve Smith,et al.  Groupthink and the Hostage Rescue Mission , 1985, British Journal of Political Science.

[29]  A. Pratkanis,et al.  Threat, Cohesion, and Group Effectiveness: Testing a Social Identity Maintenance Perspective on Groupthink , 1992 .

[30]  Won-Woo Park,et al.  A Review of research on Groupthink , 1990 .

[31]  Clark McCauley,et al.  The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. , 1989 .

[32]  Annette R. Flippen.  Understanding Groupthink from a Self-Regulatory Perspective , 1999 .

[33]  M. Amidon.  Groupthink, Politics, and the Decision to Attempt the Son Tay Rescue , 2005, The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters.

[34]  B. Raven,et al.  Groupthink, Bay of Pigs, and Watergate Reconsidered. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[35]  A. Pratkanis,et al.  A Social Identity Maintenance Model of Groupthink. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[36]  Christopher P. Neck,et al.  Groupthink and sports: An application of Whyte's model , 2003 .

[37]  M. Hogg,et al.  Friendship and group identification: a new look at the role of cohesiveness in groupthink , 1998 .

[38]  A. Pratkanis,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives on Groupthink: A Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Appraisal. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[39]  U. Rosenthal,et al.  Experts and Decision Makers in Crisis Situations , 1991 .

[40]  Ramon J. Aldag,et al.  Beyond fiasco: A reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes. , 1993 .

[41]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  The Organizational Application of Groupthink and Its Limitations in Organizations , 1999 .

[42]  Rookmin Maharaj,et al.  Corporate governance decision-making model: How to nominate skilled board members, by addressing the formal and informal systems , 2009 .

[43]  Ramon J. Aldag,et al.  Organizational Tonypandy: Lessons from a Quarter Century of the Groupthink Phenomenon. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[44]  J. Eaton.  Management communication: the threat of groupthink , 2001 .

[45]  David Dryden Henningsen,et al.  Examining the Symptoms of Groupthink and Retrospective Sensemaking , 2006 .

[46]  Rookmin Maharaj.  Corporate governance, groupthink and bullies in the boardroom , 2008 .

[47]  J. K. Esser,et al.  Testing the groupthink model: Effects of promotional leadership and conformity predisposition , 2001 .

[48]  John R. Montanari,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Groupthink Phenomenon , 1986 .

[49]  John A. Courtright,et al.  A laboratory investigation of groupthink , 1978 .

[50]  Christopher P. Neck,et al.  Group Decision Fiascoes Continue: Space Shuttle Challenger and a Revised Groupthink Framework , 1991 .

[51]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[52]  Judith Ann Chapman,et al.  Anxiety and defective decision making: an elaboration of the groupthink model , 2006 .

[53]  Won-Woo Park,et al.  A comprehensive empirical investigation of the relationships among variables of the groupthink model , 2000 .

[54]  Hart.  Preventing Groupthink Revisited: Evaluating and Reforming Groups in Government. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[55]  M. Maier.  Ten Years after A Major Malfunction... , 2002 .

[56]  M. Schafer,et al.  The Process‐Outcome Connection in Foreign Policy Decision Making: A Quantitative Study Building on Groupthink , 2002 .