Process-based modelling of NH 3 exchange with grazed grasslands

Abstract. In this study the GAG model, a process-based ammonia (NH3) emission model for urine patches, was extended and applied for the field scale. The new model (GAG_field) was tested over two modelling periods, for which micrometeorological NH3 flux data were available. Acknowledging uncertainties in the measurements, the model was able to simulate the main features of the observed fluxes. The temporal evolution of the simulated NH3 exchange flux was found to be dominated by NH3 emission from the urine patches, offset by simultaneous NH3 deposition to areas of the field not affected by urine. The simulations show how NH3 fluxes over a grazed field in a given day can be affected by urine patches deposited several days earlier, linked to the interaction of volatilization processes with soil pH dynamics. Sensitivity analysis showed that GAG_field was more sensitive to soil buffering capacity (β), field capacity (θfc) and permanent wilting point (θpwp) than the patch-scale model. The reason for these different sensitivities is dual. Firstly, the difference originates from the different scales. Secondly, the difference can be explained by the different initial soil pH and physical properties, which determine the maximum volume of urine that can be stored in the NH3 source layer. It was found that in the case of urine patches with a higher initial soil pH and higher initial soil water content, the sensitivity of NH3 exchange to β was stronger. Also, in the case of a higher initial soil water content, NH3 exchange was more sensitive to the changes in θfc and θpwp. The sensitivity analysis showed that the nitrogen content of urine (cN) is associated with high uncertainty in the simulated fluxes. However, model experiments based on cN values randomized from an estimated statistical distribution indicated that this uncertainty is considerably smaller in practice. Finally, GAG_field was tested with a constant soil pH of 7.5. The variation of NH3 fluxes simulated in this way showed a good agreement with those from the simulations with the original approach, accounting for a dynamically changing soil pH. These results suggest a way for model simplification when GAG_field is applied later at regional scale.

[1]  A. Móring.  Process-based modelling of ammonia emission from grazing , 2017 .

[2]  Ammonia emissions from a grazed field estimated by miniDOAS measurements and inverse dispersion modelling , 2016 .

[3]  T. Misselbrook,et al.  Automated monitoring of urination events from grazing cattle , 2016 .

[4]  R. Doherty,et al.  A process-based model for ammonia emission from urine patches, GAG (Generation of Ammonia from Grazing): description and sensitivity analysis , 2015 .

[5]  Grant R. Edwards,et al.  Measuring excreta patch distribution in grazed pasture through low‐cost image analysis , 2013 .

[6]  B. Loubet,et al.  Advances in Understanding, Models and Parameterizations of Biosphere-Atmosphere Ammonia Exchange , 2013 .

[7]  Stefan Reis,et al.  Towards a climate-dependent paradigm of ammonia emission and deposition , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Allison M. Leach,et al.  The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  F. Kelliher,et al.  Ammonia emissions from cattle urine and dung excreted on pasture , 2013 .

[10]  R. Cichota,et al.  Effects of nitrogen load variation in animal urination events on nitrogen leaching from grazed pasture , 2012 .

[11]  F. Kelliher,et al.  Measuring and modelling ammonia emissions from a regular pattern of cattle urine patches , 2012 .

[12]  P. Beukes,et al.  A urine patch framework to simulate nitrogen leaching on New Zealand dairy farms , 2012, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[13]  W. J. Bealey,et al.  The challenge to integrate nitrogen science and policies: the European Nitrogen Assessment approach , 2011 .

[14]  H. Di,et al.  The spatial coverage of dairy cattle urine patches in an intensively grazed pasture system , 2010, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[15]  R. Massad,et al.  Review and parameterisation of bi-directional ammonia exchange between vegetation and the atmosphere , 2010 .

[16]  S. Ledgard,et al.  Nitrogen concentration in the urine of cattle, sheep and deer grazing a common ryegrass/cocksfoot/white clover pasture , 2010 .

[17]  K. Betteridge,et al.  Sensors for detecting and logging spatial distribution of urine patches of grazing female sheep and cattle , 2010 .

[18]  B. Loubet,et al.  Advection of NH3 over a pasture field and its effect on gradient flux measurements , 2009 .

[19]  M. Sutton,et al.  Modelling the dynamic chemical interactions of atmospheric ammonia with leaf surface wetness in a managed grassland canopy , 2009 .

[20]  J. Galloway,et al.  Transformation of the Nitrogen Cycle: Recent Trends, Questions, and Potential Solutions , 2008, Science.

[21]  A. Pleasants,et al.  A stochastic model of urinary nitrogen and water flow in grassland soil in New Zealand , 2007 .

[22]  G. Wake,et al.  The distribution of urine deposited on a pasture from grazing animals , 2006, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[23]  P. Williams,et al.  Comparison of initial wetting pattern, nutrient concentrations in soil solution and the fate of15N-labelled urine in sheep and cattle urine patch areas of pasture soil , 1994, Plant and Soil.

[24]  R. Sherlock,et al.  Dynamics of ammonia volatilization from simulated urine patches and aqueous urea applied to pasture. II. Theoretical derivation of a simplified model , 1985, Fertilizer research.

[25]  P. Dillon,et al.  Leaching losses of N under grazed irrigated and non-irrigated pastures , 2004, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[26]  Mark A. Sutton,et al.  Coupling soil-plant-atmosphere exchange of ammonia with ecosystem functioning in grasslands , 2002 .

[27]  Mark R. Theobald,et al.  Dynamics of Ammonia Exchange in Response to Cutting and Fertilising in an Intensively-Managed Grassland , 2001 .

[28]  Mark A. Sutton,et al.  A two‐layer canopy compensation point model for describing bi‐directional biosphere‐atmosphere exchange of ammonia , 2001 .

[29]  S. O. Petersen,et al.  Ammonia losses from urine and dung of grazing cattle: effect of N intake , 1998 .

[30]  P. Cellier,et al.  A mechanistic model for estimating ammonia volatilization from slurry applied to bare soil , 1997 .

[31]  G. P. Wyers,et al.  Biosphere - Atmosphere Exchange of Ammonia , 1997 .

[32]  David Whitehead.  Grassland Nitrogen , 1995 .

[33]  M. A. Sutton,et al.  Plant—atmosphere exchange of ammonia , 1995, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[34]  G. P. Wyers,et al.  A continuous-flow denuder for the measurement of ambient concentrations and surface-exchange fluxes of ammonia , 1993 .

[35]  K. Betteridge,et al.  Intake and excretion of nitrogen, potassium and phosporus by grazing steers , 1986, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[36]  P. Nye,et al.  A model of ammonia volatilization from applied urea. I. Development of the model , 1986 .

[37]  P. Nye,et al.  A model of ammonia volatilization from applied urea. II. Experimental testing , 1986 .

[38]  G. Farquhar,et al.  On the Gaseous Exchange of Ammonia between Leaves and the Environment: Determination of the Ammonia Compensation Point. , 1980, Plant physiology.

[39]  R. G. Petersen,et al.  The Distribution of Excreta by Freely Grazing Cattle and Its Effect on Pasture Fertility: I. Excretal Distribution1 , 1956 .