Use of time by physiotherapists and occupational therapists in a stroke rehabilitation unit: A comparison between four European rehabilitation centres

Purpose. The aim of this study was to compare the time allocated to therapeutic activities (TA) and non-therapeutic activities (NTA) of physiotherapists (PT) and occupational therapists (OT) in stroke rehabilitation units in four European countries. Method. Therapists documented their activities in 15-min periods for two weeks. They recorded: activity, number of patients, number of stroke patients, involvement of other people, location and frequency of each activity. Kruskal-Wallis tests and negative binomial regression models were used to compare activities between professional groups and between units. Results. The average proportion of TA per day ranged between 32.9% and 66.1% and was higher for PT than for OT in each unit. For OT, significant differences emerged between the units in the proportion of time allocated to TA compared to NTA with British OTs spending significantly less time in TA. In the Belgian unit, three times less time was spent on patient-related co-ordination activities (e.g., administration, ward rounds) compared to the British and Swiss units. Conclusions. Time allocation differed between PT and OT and between units, affecting the time available for TA. Further investigation is necessary to study the effect of work organization in stroke rehabilitation units on the efficiency of rehabilitation regimes.

[1]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Early supported discharge services for stroke patients: a meta-analysis of individual patients' data , 2005, The Lancet.

[2]  P. Duncan,et al.  The structure and structural effects of VA rehabilitation bedservice care for stroke. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Comparison of rehabilitation practice on hospital wards for stroke patients. , 1996, Stroke.

[4]  J. Limbeek,et al.  Early supported discharge: a valuable alternative for some stroke patients , 2005, The Lancet.

[5]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  M. Brainin,et al.  Acute neurological stroke care in Europe: results of the European Stroke Care Inventory , 2000, European journal of neurology.

[7]  W De Weerdt,et al.  Group physiotherapy improves time use by patients with stroke in rehabilitation. , 2001, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[8]  P. Duncan,et al.  A taxonomy for classification of stroke rehabilitation services. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  E. Lesaffre,et al.  Use of Time by Stroke Patients: A Comparison of Four European Rehabilitation Centers , 2005, Stroke.

[10]  A. Batenhorst,et al.  A comparison of time-and-motion and self-reporting methods of work measurement. , 2000, The Journal of nursing administration.

[11]  D. Jette,et al.  The relation between therapy intensity and outcomes of rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Nancy K Latham,et al.  Physical therapy interventions for patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. , 2005, Physical therapy.

[13]  Michael A. West,et al.  Managing people and performance: an evidence based framework applied to health service organizations , 2004 .

[14]  Javier Almazán,et al.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Rehabilitation at Home after Stroke: One-Year Follow-Up of Patient Outcome, Resource Use and Cost , 2001, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[15]  C Ballinger,et al.  Unpacking the black box of therapy – a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[16]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Variations Between Countries in Outcome After Stroke in the International Stroke Trial (IST) , 2001, Stroke.

[17]  D. Swinnen,et al.  Time use of stroke patients in an intensive rehabilitation unit: a comparison between a Belgian and a Swiss setting. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[18]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Evidence behind stroke rehabilitation , 2003, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  M. Dijkers,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: Using an inductive approach to examine the "black box" of rehabilitation. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  M. Drummond,et al.  HEALTH CARE RESOURCE USE AND STROKE OUTCOME , 2003, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[21]  E. Clipp,et al.  New horizons in stroke rehabilitation research. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  Martin Knapp,et al.  Alternative strategies for stroke care: a prospective randomised controlled trial , 2000, The Lancet.

[23]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis , 2004, Stroke.

[24]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Introduction to Generalized Linear Models , 2003 .

[25]  A. Atwal,et al.  Do multidisciplinary integrated care pathways improve interprofessional collaboration? , 2002, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.