Spectral mismatch correction and spectrometric characterization of monolithic III–V multi‐junction solar cells

III-V monolithic multi-junction (MJ) solar cells reach efficiencies exceeding 30% (AM 1.5 global) and have applications in space and in terrestrial concentrator systems. The subcells of monolithic MJ cells are not accessible separately, which presents a challenge to measurement systems and procedures. A mathematical approach is presented which enables a fast way of spectral mismatch correction for MJ cells, thereby significantly reducing the time required for calibration. Moreover, a systematic investigation of the I-V parameters of a MJ solar cell with variation of the incident spectrum is possible, herein called 'spectrometric characterization'. This analysis method visualizes the effects of current limitation and shifting of the operating voltage, and yields precise information about the current-matching of the subcells. MJ cells can hereby be compared without the need to match the current of the structures to a reference spectrum in advance. Further applications of the spectrometric characterization are suggested, such as for the determination of the radiation response of the subcells of MJ space solar cells or for the prediction of the annual power output of terrestrial MJ concentrator cells.

[1]  R. Adelhelm,et al.  Matching of multi junction solar cells for solar array production , 2000, Conference Record of the Twenty-Eighth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37036).

[2]  Performance and parameter analysis of tandem solar cells using measurements at multiple spectral conditions , 1998 .

[3]  G. Virshup.  Measurement techniques for multijunction solar cells , 1990, IEEE Conference on Photovoltaic Specialists.

[4]  J. Burdick,et al.  Spectral response and I–V measurements of tandem amorphous-silicon alloy solar cells , 1986 .

[5]  Robert J. Walters,et al.  Modeling solar cell degradation in space: A comparison of the NRL displacement damage dose and the JPL equivalent fluence approaches † , 2001 .

[6]  Frank Dimroth,et al.  Metamorphic GayIn1−yP/Ga1−xInxAs tandem solar cells for space and for terrestrial concentrator applications at C > 1000 suns , 2001 .

[7]  K. Emery,et al.  Procedures for evaluating multijunction concentrators , 2000, Conference Record of the Twenty-Eighth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37036).

[8]  J. Burdick,et al.  A method for determining the conversion efficiency of multiple-cell photovoltaic devices , 1987 .

[9]  F. Nagamine,et al.  New solar simulator for multi-junction solar cell measurements , 1993, Conference Record of the Twenty Third IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1993 (Cat. No.93CH3283-9).

[10]  B. Kroposki,et al.  Photovoltaic module energy rating methodology development , 1996, Conference Record of the Twenty Fifth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1996.

[11]  Martin A. Green,et al.  Solar cell efficiency tables (version 18) , 2001 .

[12]  K. Emery,et al.  An uncertainty analysis of the spectral correction factor , 1993, Conference Record of the Twenty Third IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1993 (Cat. No.93CH3283-9).

[13]  B. Marion,et al.  Validation of a Photovoltaic Module Energy Ratings Procedure at NREL , 1999 .

[14]  Daryl R. Myers,et al.  Methods for Measuring Solar Cell Efficiency Independent of Reference Cell or Light Source , 1985 .

[15]  Carl R. Osterwald,et al.  A comparison of the errors in determining the conversion efficiency of multijunction solar cells by various methods , 1988 .

[16]  David L. King,et al.  New methods for measuring performance of monolithic multi-junction solar cells , 2000, Conference Record of the Twenty-Eighth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37036).

[17]  S. Kurtz,et al.  The influence of spectral solar irradiance variations on the performance of selected single-junction and multijunction solar cells , 1991 .