Results of potential exposure assessments during the maintenance and cleanout of deposition equipment

This study is a compilation of results obtained during the cleanout of deposition equipment such as chemical vapor deposition or physical vapor deposition The measurement campaigns aimed to evaluate the potential exposure to nanoaerosols in the occupational environment and were conducted in the workspace. The characterization of aerosols includes measurements of the concentration using condensation particle counters and measurements of the size distribution using fast mobility particle sizer, scanning mobility particle sizer, and electrical low pressure impactor (ELPI). Particles were sampled using collection membranes placed on the ELPIs stages. The samples were analyzed with an SEM–EDS to provide information including size, shape, agglomeration state, and the chemical composition of the particles. The majority of the time, no emission of nanoparticles (NPs) was measured during the use of the molecular deposition equipment or when opening the chambers, mainly due to the enclosed processes. On the other hand, the maintenance of the equipment, and especially the cleanout step, could induce high concentrations of NPs in the workplace following certain processes. Values of around 1 million particles/cm3 were detected with a size distribution including a high concentration of particles around 10 nm.

[1]  J. Kong,et al.  Characterization and evaluation of nanoparticle release during the synthesis of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes by chemical vapor deposition. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Linsey C Marr,et al.  Characterization of airborne particles during production of carbonaceous nanomaterials. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  E. Lefranc,et al.  Characterization of manufactured nanoparticles at workplace , 2011 .

[4]  Size distributions of aerosols in an indoor environment with engineered nanoparticle synthesis reactors operating under different scenarios , 2010 .

[5]  Delphine Bard,et al.  From workplace air measurement results toward estimates of exposure? Development of a strategy to assess exposure to manufactured nano-objects , 2009 .

[6]  J. Jokiniemi,et al.  Exposure to CeO2 nanoparticles during flame spray process , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[7]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Exposure to manufactured nanostructured particles in an industrial pilot plant. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[8]  Miran Kwon,et al.  Exposure assessment of workplaces manufacturing nanosized TiO2 and silver , 2011, Inhalation toxicology.

[9]  P. Baron,et al.  Exposure to Carbon Nanotube Material: Aerosol Release During the Handling of Unrefined Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Material , 2004, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[10]  M Methner,et al.  Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique (NEAT) for the Identification and Measurement of Potential Inhalation Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials—Part A , 2010, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[11]  Hong-Chun Wu,et al.  Research of minimum ignition energy for nano Titanium powder and nano Iron powder , 2009 .

[12]  Brian L. Wardle,et al.  Particle exposure levels during CVD growth and subsequent handling of vertically-aligned carbon nanotube films , 2008 .

[13]  M Methner,et al.  Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique (NEAT) for the Identification and Measurement of Potential Inhalation Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials—Part B: Results from 12 Field Studies , 2010, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[14]  Mark M. Methner,et al.  Engineering Case Reports , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[15]  R. Aitken,et al.  Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: Current abilities and future requirements , 2007 .