Kinematic artifacts in prestack depth migration

Strong refraction of waves in the migration velocity model introduces kinematic artifacts?coherent events not corresponding to actual reflectors?into the image volumes produced by prestack depth migration applied to individual data bins. Because individual bins are migrated independently, the migration has no access to the bin component of slowness. This loss of slowness information permits events to migrate along multiple incident-reflected ray pairs, thus introducing spurious coherent events into the image volume. This pathology occurs for all common binning strategies, including common-source, common-offset, and common-scattering angle. Since the artifacts move out with bin parameter, their effect on the final stacked image is minimal, provided that the migration velocity model is kinematically correct. However, common-image gathers may exhibit energetic primary events with substantial residual moveout, even with the kinematically accurate migration velocity model.

[1]  W. A. Mulder,et al.  Automatic velocity analysis by differential semblance optimization , 2002 .

[2]  S. Gray,et al.  Kirchhoff migration using eikonal equation traveltimes , 1994 .

[3]  Öz Yilmaz,et al.  Seismic data processing , 1987 .

[4]  N. Bleistein,et al.  Mathematical analysis of residual moveout and velocity analysis , 1995 .

[6]  David Lumley,et al.  Imaging complex geologic structure with single‐arrival Kirchhoff prestack depth migration , 1997 .

[7]  Sheng Xu,et al.  Common‐angle migration: A strategy for imaging complex media , 2001 .

[8]  William W. Symes,et al.  Global solution of a linearized inverse problem for the wave equation , 1997 .

[9]  Sverre Brandsberg-Dahl,et al.  Focusing in dip and AVA compensation on scattering‐angle/azimuth common image gathers , 2003 .

[10]  Biondo Biondi,et al.  Angle-domain common image gathers by wave-equation migration , 1999 .

[11]  Alan R. Levander,et al.  Finite-difference forward modeling in seismology , 1989 .

[12]  A. P. E. ten Kroode,et al.  A microlocal analysis of migration , 1998 .

[13]  M. Turhan Taner,et al.  Velocity spectra-digital computer derivation and applications of velocity functions , 1969 .

[14]  W. A. Mulder,et al.  Automatic velocity analysis by differential semblance optimization , 2002 .

[15]  On double integrals over spheres , 1988 .

[16]  C. Stolk.  MICROLOCAL ANALYSIS OF THE SCATTERING ANGLE TRANSFORM , 2002 .

[17]  Seismic inverse scattering in the `wave-equation' approach , 2001, math/0112172.

[18]  G. Lambaré,et al.  Can we quantitatively image complex structures with rays , 2000 .

[19]  Jean-Pierre Faye,et al.  Prestack Migration Velocities From Focusing Depth Analysis , 1986 .

[20]  Christiaan C. Stolk,et al.  Microlocal analysis of a seismic linearized inverse problem , 2000 .

[21]  W. Symes,et al.  Imaging And Coherency In Complex Structures , 1996 .

[22]  Roelof Versteeg,et al.  Sensitivity of prestack depth migration to the velocity model , 1993 .

[23]  J. F. Clearbout.  Imaging the Earth's interior. , 1985 .

[24]  John Sherwood,et al.  Depth migration before stack , 1980 .

[25]  Biondo Biondi,et al.  Prestack imaging of overturned reflections by reverse time migration , 2002 .

[26]  Bjørn Ursin,et al.  Velocity Analysis In the Common Scattering-angle/azimuth Domain , 1999 .

[27]  Paul Sava,et al.  Amplitude-preserved common image gathers by wave-equation migration , 2001 .

[28]  Jean Brac,et al.  Can we image complex structures with first‐arrival traveltime? , 1993 .