On consistency of closed-loop subspace identification with innovation estimation

In this paper, we show that the consistency of closed-loop subspace identification methods (SIMs) can be achieved through innovation estimation. Based on this analysis, a sufficient condition for the consistency of a new proposed closed-loop SIM is given. A consistent estimate of the Kalman gain under closed-loop conditions is also provided based on the algorithm. A multi-input-multi-output (MIMO) simulation shows that it is consistent under closed-loop condition, when traditional SIMs fail to provide consistent estimates.

[1]  Alessandro Chiuso,et al.  Constructing the state of random processes with feedback , 2003 .

[2]  Torben Knudsen Consistency analysis of subspace identification methods based on a linear regression approach , 2001, Autom..

[3]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Closed-loop identification revisited , 1999, Autom..

[4]  Bart De Moor,et al.  N4SID: Subspace algorithms for the identification of combined deterministic-stochastic systems , 1994, Autom..

[5]  Håkan Hjalmarsson,et al.  From experiment design to closed-loop control , 2005, Autom..

[6]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  A Novel Subspace Identiflcation Approach with Parsimonious Parametrization , 2004 .

[7]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Closed-Loop Subspace Identification with Innovation Estimation , 2003 .

[8]  L. Ljung Asymptotic variance expressions for identified black-box transfer function models , 1984, The 23rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[9]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Subspace identification from closed loop data , 1996, Signal Process..

[10]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[11]  D. D. Ruscio Combined deterministic and stochastic system identification and realization : DSR : a subspace approach based on observations , 1996 .

[12]  L. Ljung Asymptotic variance expressions for identified black-box transfer function models , 1984 .

[13]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Parallel QR Implementation of Subspace Identification with Parsimonious Models , 2003 .

[14]  Patrick Dewilde,et al.  Subspace model identification Part 1. The output-error state-space model identification class of algorithms , 1992 .

[15]  Bo Wahlberg,et al.  A linear regression approach to state-space subspace system identification , 1996, Signal Process..

[16]  Håkan Hjalmarsson,et al.  From experiments to closed loop control , 2003 .

[17]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Application of a subspace model identification technique to identify LTI systems operating in closed-loop , 1993, Autom..

[18]  Wallace E. Larimore,et al.  Canonical variate analysis in identification, filtering, and adaptive control , 1990, 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.