Impact of Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy on Final Outcome in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Our Experience and Technique in Pakistan

Backgroud Due to extensive fibrosis during revision surgery, adequate exposure is essential and it can be achieved with several extensile approach options, such as tibial tubercle osteotomy. Information regarding surgical exposure during revision arthroplasty is limited in developing countries, such as Pakistan, due to the lack of adequate data collection and follow-up. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tibial tubercle osteotomy on final outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods A total of 231 revision TKAs were performed between January 2008 and December 2017. Twenty-nine patients underwent tibial tubercle osteotomy for adequate exposure during revision surgery. Of these, 27 patients with complete follow-up were included in our study. Factors examined include age at the time of revision surgery, gender, comorbidities, arthroplasty site (right or left), body mass index (BMI), and primary indications for the tibial tubercle osteotomy during revision TKA. Functional outcome was measured by using Knee Society score (KSS) at 3 months and the final follow-up. All statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.0 with a p-value < 0.05 considered significant. Results Out of 27 patients, 6 patients (22.2%) were men and 21 patients (77.7%) were women. Right knee revision arthroplasty was performed in 15 patients (55.5%), left knee revision arthroplasty was performed in 12 patients (44.4%), and bilateral revision surgery was performed in only 1 patient (3.7%). The mean BMI was 29.2 kg/m2. We used a constrained condylar knee in 20 patients (74%), a rotating hinge knee in 5 patients (18.5%), and mobile bearing tray plus metaphyseal sleeves in 2 patients (7.4%). The KSS was 52.21 ± 4.05 preoperatively, and 79.42 ± 2.2 and 80.12 ± 1.33 at 3 months and 12 months, respectively. Radiological union was achieved in all patients at 3 months. Of 27 patients, only 1 patient (3.7%) had proximal migration of the osteotomy site at 6 months: the patient was asymptomatic and union was also achieved and, therefore, no surgical intervention was performed. Conclusions Tibial tubercle osteotomy during revision TKA can be a safe and reliable technique with superior outcomes and minimal complication rates.

[1]  Faizan Iqbal,et al.  Micro-organisms and risk factors associated with prosthetic joint infection following primary total knee replacement—our experience in Pakistan , 2019, International Orthopaedics.

[2]  I. Petersen,et al.  Low-grade infections as a possible cause of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty , 2019, Patient Safety in Surgery.

[3]  C. de César Netto,et al.  Vascular supply at risk during lateral release of the patella during total knee arthroplasty: A cadaveric study. , 2017, Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma.

[4]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Implant extraction in revision knee arthroplasty , 2018, Seminars in Arthroplasty.

[5]  A. Camera,et al.  Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Midterm Results Experience of a Monocentric Study , 2018, Joints.

[6]  A. Camera,et al.  Tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) in total knee arthroplasty, is it worth it? A review of the literature , 2018, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[7]  R. Scott Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2018, Springer International Publishing.

[8]  J. Seon,et al.  Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2017, Knee surgery & related research.

[9]  N. Clement,et al.  Posterior condylar offset is an independent predictor of functional outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty , 2017, Bone & joint research.

[10]  S. Shukla,et al.  Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy to Aid Exposure for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2016, JBJS essential surgical techniques.

[11]  Emmanuel Thienpont,et al.  Revision knee surgery techniques , 2016, EFORT open reviews.

[12]  M. Abdel,et al.  The surgical approach for revision total knee arthroplasty. , 2016, The bone & joint journal.

[13]  J. Seon,et al.  Comparison of quadriceps snip and tibial tubercle osteotomy in revision for infected total knee arthroplasty , 2015, International Orthopaedics.

[14]  R. Barrack,et al.  Increased risk of failure following revision total knee replacement in patients aged 55 years and younger. , 2014, The bone & joint journal.

[15]  F. Vilchez-Cavazos,et al.  Tibial tubercle osteotomy in septic revision total knee arthroplasty , 2014, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[16]  J. Parvizi,et al.  The impact of patellar resurfacing in two-stage revision of the infected total knee arthroplasty. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  P. Nolte,et al.  Tibial tubercle osteotomy with absorbable suture fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a report of 23 cases , 2014, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[18]  W. Mittelmeier,et al.  Economic Impact of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2012, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[19]  A. Halder Tuberositasosteotomie in der Knieendoprothetik , 2012, Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie.

[20]  M. Daabiss,et al.  American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification , 2011, Indian journal of anaesthesia.

[21]  A. Wymenga,et al.  Tibial tubercle osteotomy , 2008, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[22]  R. Laskin,et al.  Management of the Extensor Mechanism During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2005 .

[23]  G. Engh Exposure Options for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2005 .

[24]  S. Lyu Extensile Exposure in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using an Osteomyofascial Flap , 2004 .

[25]  H. Clarke Tibial tubercle osteotomy. , 2003, The journal of knee surgery.

[26]  J. Wayne,et al.  Mechanical Comparison of Fixation Techniques for the Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  L. Dorr,et al.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.