HIGH VOLUME/HIGH SPEED ASPHALT ROADWAY PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SURFACE TREATMENTS

The South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT) has made extensive use of chip seal and sand seal surface treatments in the maintenance of their asphaltic concrete (AC) pavements. Such surface treatments have been found to provide a cost-effective means of extending the life of AC pavements in South Dakota. Although the use of chip seals and sand seals have for the most part been reliable treatments, there have been some notable failures, especially on high-volume, high-speed roadways. This project was undertaken to investigate the use of chip seals for such applications and to make recommendations to improve their performance. This project also involved the development of guidelines for the design and construction of chip seals. To evaluate the use of chip seals in South Dakota, several efforts were undertaken. First, an extensive literature review was conducted to develop an understanding of the latest practices and experiences. Second, interviews were conducted with SDDOT from all departments involved in the chip seal process to investigate their practices and to determine areas for improvement. Finally, test sections were constructed to evaluate the performance of standard and modified chip seal designs. The test sections consisted of 12 chip seal designs and included two aggregate types (quartzite and natural aggregate) and alternate chip seal designs with new gradations and other modifications and enhancements. Based on these efforts, recommendations are provided to improve chip seal performance. In addition, guidelines were developed to select feasible surface treatments for a specific project.

[1]  J Samanos,et al.  NEW TYPE OF ULTRATHIN FRICTION COURSE , 1991 .

[2]  D W Janisch,et al.  MINNESOTA SEAL COAT HANDBOOK , 1998 .

[3]  Cindy K Estakhri,et al.  EVALUATION OF ULTRATHIN FRICTION COURSE , 1994 .

[4]  Scott Shuler HIGH-TRAFFIC CHIP-SEAL CONSTRUCTION: THE TULSA TEST ROAD , 1991 .

[5]  Michael S Mamlouk,et al.  Pavement Maintenance Effectiveness: Preventive Maintenance Treatments: Instructor's Guide , 1996 .

[6]  Rajib B. Mallick,et al.  Open Graded Asphalt Friction Course: State of the Practice , 1998 .

[7]  Scott Shuler Design and Construction of Chip Seals for High Traffic Volume , 1998 .

[8]  C Dwight Hixon,et al.  NINE YEARS OF MICROSURFACING IN OKLAHOMA , 1993 .

[9]  James S. Moulthrop,et al.  Selecting a Preventive Maintenance Treatment for Flexible Pavements , 1999 .

[10]  H Raza,et al.  STATE-OF-THE-PRACTICE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND PERFORMANCE OF MICRO-SURFACING. FINAL REPORT , 1994 .

[11]  Prithvi S. Kandhal SIMPLIFIED DESIGN APPROACH TO SURFACE TREATMENTS FOR LOW-VOLUME ROADS , 1983 .

[12]  D A Morian,et al.  PAVEMENT TREATMENT EFFECTIVENESS, 1995 SPS-3 AND SPS-4 SITE EVALUATIONS, NATIONAL REPORT , 1997 .

[13]  T S Rutkowski EVALUATION OF SEAL COATS AS A PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE TACTIC FOR PREMATURE DISTRESS IN ASPHALTIC PAVEMENTS. FINAL REPORT , 1995 .

[14]  Joe P. Mahoney,et al.  WASHINGTON STATE CHIP SEAL STUDY , 1990 .

[15]  J. Landes Application of a J-Q Model for Fracture in the Ductile-Brittle Transition , 1997 .

[16]  H A Smith PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF OPEN-GRADED FRICTION COURSES , 1992 .

[17]  Guk-Rwang Won American Society for Testing and Materials , 1987 .

[18]  Prithvi S. Kandhal,et al.  Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design and Construction , 1996 .

[19]  P S Kandhal,et al.  CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTING PRECOATED AGGREGATES FOR SEAL COATS AND SURFACE TREATMENTS , 1987 .

[20]  Mary Stroup-Gardiner,et al.  Flexible Pavement Rehabilitation and Maintenance , 1998 .

[21]  M Acott THIN HOT MIX ASPHALT SURFACINGS , 1991 .

[22]  Christine M Reed SEVEN-YEAR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SINGLE PASS, THIN LIFT BITUMINOUS CONCRETE OVERLAYS , 1994 .

[23]  D A Morian,et al.  MAINTAINING FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS - THE LONG TERM PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE EXPERIMENT SPS-3 5-YEAR DATA ANALYSIS , 1998 .

[24]  W L Hindermann,et al.  Asphalt in Pavement Maintenance , 1968 .

[25]  W H Campen,et al.  A GENERAL METHOD OF DESIGN FOR SEAL COATS AND SURFACE TREATMENTS , 1969 .

[26]  James C Wambold,et al.  USE OF SMOOTH-TREADED TEST TIRE IN EVALUATING SKID RESISTANCE , 1992 .

[27]  D N Geoffroy COST-EFFECTIVE PREVENTIVE PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE , 1996 .

[28]  Prithvi S. Kandhal,et al.  CONSTRUCTION AND PERFORMANCE OF ULTRATHIN ASPHALT FRICTION COURSE , 1997 .

[29]  R E Smith,et al.  PAVEMENT PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS , 1991 .

[30]  J W Button,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NOVACHIP (TRADEMARK): ULTRATHIN FRICTION COURSE. FINAL REPORT , 1995 .

[31]  Rajib B. Mallick,et al.  Pavement recycling guidelines for state and local governments: Participant`s reference book. Final report, September 1995--December 1997 , 1997 .

[32]  R G Hicks,et al.  EVALUATION OF OPEN-GRADED ASPHALT CONCRETE MIXTURES USED IN OREGON , 1991 .

[33]  K A Zimmerman GUIDELINES FOR USING ECONOMIC FACTORS AND MAINTENANCE COSTS IN LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS , 1997 .

[34]  G C Page Open-graded friction courses: Florida's experience , 1993 .

[35]  Dallas N. Little,et al.  HOT IN-PLACE RECYCLING OF ASPHALT CONCRETE , 1994 .

[36]  M. Baucus Transportation Research Board , 1982 .