Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments.

Four experiments investigated the conditions contributing to sensorimotor alignment effects (i.e., the advantage for spatial judgments from imagined perspectives aligned with the body). Through virtual reality technology, participants learned object locations around a room (learning room) and made spatial judgments from imagined perspectives aligned or misaligned with their actual facing direction. Sensorimotor alignment effects were found when testing occurred in the learning room but not after walking 3 m into a neighboring (novel) room. Sensorimotor alignment effects returned after returning to the learning room or after providing participants with egocentric imagery instructions in the novel room. Additionally, visual and spatial similarities between the test and learning environments were independently sufficient to cause sensorimotor alignment effects. Memory alignment effects, independent from sensorimotor alignment effects, occurred in all testing conditions. Results are interpreted in the context of two-system spatial memory theories positing separate representations to account for sensorimotor and memory alignment effects.

[1]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  M. Sholl Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Spatial Memories of Virtual Environments , 2007 .

[4]  D. L. Hintzman,et al.  Orientation in cognitive maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  R. D. Easton,et al.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  M. May,et al.  Imaginal repositioning in everyday environments: effects of testing method and setting , 2007, Psychological research.

[7]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Locomotion Mode Affects the Updating of Objects Encountered During Travel: The Contribution of Vestibular and Proprioceptive Inputs to Path Integration , 1998, Presence.

[8]  Michael F. Young,et al.  Imagery, action, and young children's spatial orientation: it's not being there that counts, it's what one has in mind. , 1994, Child development.

[9]  J M Loomis,et al.  Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[11]  T. McNamara,et al.  Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Steffen Werner,et al.  Environmental reference systems for large-scale spaces , 1999, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[13]  T. McNamara,et al.  Multiple views of spatial memory , 1997 .

[14]  M. Jeanne Sholl,et al.  The Role of a Self-Reference System in Spatial Navigation , 2001, COSIT.

[15]  Betsy Williams Sanders,et al.  Functional similarities in spatial representations between real and virtual environments , 2007, TAP.

[16]  Werner Kuhn,et al.  Spatial Information Theory. Foundations of Geographic Information Science , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[17]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Systems of Spatial Reference in Human Memory , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Frames of reference in mobile augmented reality displays. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[19]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  Imagined Perspective-Changing Within and Across Novel Environments , 2004, Spatial Cognition.

[20]  T. McNamara,et al.  Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Changing perspective within and across environments , 2003, Cognition.

[22]  T. McNamara,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence in Scene Recognition , 1997 .

[23]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Human navigation in nested environments. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  M. May,et al.  Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  B. Tversky,et al.  Searching imagined environments. , 1990 .

[27]  Simon Lessels,et al.  For Efficient Navigational Search, Humans Require Full Physical Movement, but Not a Rich Visual Scene , 2006, Psychological science.

[28]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Spatial Orientation and the Angularity of Urban Routes , 1991 .

[29]  M. Jeanne Sholl,et al.  Egocentric frames of reference used for the retrieval of survey knowledge learned by map and navigation , 1999, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[30]  J. Rieser Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  C C Presson,et al.  Updating after Rotational and Translational Body Movements: Coordinate Structure of Perspective Space , 1994, Perception.

[32]  Marios N. Avraamides,et al.  Spatial updating of environments described in texts , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  William H Warren,et al.  Path Integration from Optic Flow and Body Senses in a Homing Task , 2002, Perception.

[34]  M. Sholl,et al.  The role of self-to-object updating in orientation-free performance on spatial-memory tasks. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Sholl Mj Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. , 1987 .