Assessment of Student Learning Associated with Tree Thinking in an Undergraduate Introductory Organismal Biology Course

We assessed student learning of tree-thinking concepts in an Introductory Organismal Biology course with labs that had been converted to inquiry-based instruction. Students made significant gains in their abilities to map characters onto cladograms and apply the principle of parsimony, but struggled with the concept of recency of common ancestry.

[1]  Everett Weber.  Quantifying Student Learning: How to Analyze Assessment Data , 2009 .

[2]  Kristy Halverson,et al.  Improving Tree-Thinking One Learnable Skill at a Time , 2011, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[3]  Sam S Donovan,et al.  The Tree-Thinking Challenge , 2005, Science.

[4]  A. Gray,et al.  I. THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION , 1963 .

[5]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Advanced Cooperative Learning , 1998 .

[6]  R. Meisel,et al.  Teaching Tree-Thinking to Undergraduate Biology Students , 2010, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[7]  C. Hansel.  Scientific Teaching , 1972, Nature.

[8]  Steve Brewer.  A Problem-Solving Approach To the Teaching of Evolution. , 1996 .

[9]  H. Schoenfuss,et al.  Phylogenetic Reconstruction as a Broadly Applicable Teaching Tool in the Biology Classroom: The Value of Data in Estimating Likely Answers. , 2006 .

[10]  T. Ryan Gregory,et al.  Understanding Evolutionary Trees , 2008, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[11]  David E. Meltzer,et al.  The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores , 2002 .

[12]  K. Padian.  Trickle-down evolution: an approach to getting major evolutionary adaptive changes into textbooks and curricula. , 2008, Integrative and comparative biology.

[13]  L. R. Novick,et al.  Characters Are Key: The Effect of Synapomorphies on Cladogram Comprehension , 2010, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[14]  C. Darwin.  The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 1859 .

[15]  A. I.,et al.  Neural Field Continuum Limits and the Structure–Function Partitioning of Cognitive–Emotional Brain Networks , 2023, Biology.

[16]  David Bloome,et al.  Procedural Display and Classroom Lessons , 1989 .

[17]  A. Giese.  Using Inquiry & Phylogeny To Teach Comparative Morphology , 2005 .

[18]  Courtney K. Shade,et al.  Interpreting evolutionary diagrams: When topology and process conflict , 2010 .

[19]  Joel B. Hagen,et al.  The Comparative Method, Hypothesis Testing & Phylogenetic Analysis – An Introductory Laboratory , 2001 .

[20]  Kendra Spence Cheruvelil,et al.  Using Inquiry and Tree-Thinking to “March Through the Animal Phyla”: Teaching Introductory Comparative Biology in an Evolutionary Context , 2009, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[21]  Larry Flammer,et al.  Several Texts Use Evolution Approach , 2001 .

[22]  C. Maier.  Building Phylogenetic Trees from DNA Sequence Data: Investigating Polar Bear & Giant Panda Ancestry , 2001 .

[23]  Judy Perry,et al.  College Students' Misconceptions About Evolutionary Trees , 2007 .

[24]  Judy Perry,et al.  Evaluating two approaches to helping college students understand evolutionary trees through diagramming tasks. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[25]  O. Rieppel,et al.  An ancestral turtle from the Late Triassic of southwestern China , 2008, Nature.

[26]  G. Norman,et al.  Development and Evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection , 2002 .