Multi-jet propulsion organized by clonal development in a colonial siphonophore

Physonect siphonophores are colonial cnidarians that are pervasive predators in many neritic and oceanic ecosystems. Physonects employ multiple, clonal medusan individuals, termed nectophores, to propel an aggregate colony. Here we show that developmental differences between clonal nectophores of the physonect Nanomia bijuga produce a division of labour in thrust and torque production that controls direction and magnitude of whole-colony swimming. Although smaller and less powerful, the position of young nectophores near the apex of the nectosome allows them to dominate torque production for turning, whereas older, larger and more powerful individuals near the base of the nectosome contribute predominantly to forward thrust production. The patterns we describe offer insight into the biomechanical success of an ecologically important and widespread colonial animal group, but, more broadly, provide basic physical understanding of a natural solution to multi-engine organization that may contribute to the expanding field of underwater-distributed propulsion vehicle design.

[1]  S. Vogel,et al.  Life in Moving Fluids , 2020 .

[2]  J. Dabiri,et al.  Passive energy recapture in jellyfish contributes to propulsive advantage over other metazoans , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  W. B. Gladfelter,et al.  Structure and function of the locomotory system ofPolyorchis montereyensis (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) , 1972, Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen.

[4]  Francisco P. Chavez,et al.  Seasonal abundance of the siphonophore, Nanomia bijuga, in Monterey Bay , 1998 .

[5]  L. Madin,et al.  Comparative jet wake structure and swimming performance of salps , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  Edward J. Buskey,et al.  A new approach to micro-scale particle image velocimetry (µPIV) for quantifying flows around free-swimming zooplankton , 2014 .

[7]  Shuxiang Guo,et al.  Mechatronic System and Experiments of a Spherical Underwater Robot: SUR-II , 2015, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[8]  Sean P Colin,et al.  Ontogenetic Changes in the Bell Morphology and Kinematics and Swimming Behavior of Rowing Medusae: the Special Case of the Limnomedusa Liriope tetraphylla , 2011, The Biological Bulletin.

[9]  Kamran Mohseni,et al.  Pulsatile vortex generators for low-speed maneuvering of small underwater vehicles , 2006 .

[10]  M. Denny,et al.  Aperture effects in squid jet propulsion , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[11]  J. Dabiri,et al.  Ambient fluid motions influence swimming and feeding by the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi , 2014 .

[12]  J. Costello,et al.  Changing Form and Function during Development in Rowing Hydromedusae , 2009 .

[13]  J. Dabiri,et al.  Fast-swimming hydromedusae exploit velar kinematics to form an optimal vortex wake , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  G. Mackie Analysis of locomotion in a siphonophore colony , 1964, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[15]  E. G. Barham Siphonophores and the Deep Scattering Layer , 1963, Science.

[16]  John H. Costello,et al.  Medusan morphospace: phylogenetic constraints, biomechanical solutions, and ecological consequences , 2008 .

[17]  Bruce H. Robison,et al.  Deep pelagic biology , 2004 .

[18]  J. Dabiri,et al.  Stealth predation and the predatory success of the invasive ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  J. Costello,et al.  Omnivory by the small cosmopolitan hydromedusa Aglaura hemistoma , 2005 .