The Optimum Blend: Affordances and Challenges of Blended Learning For Students

The purpose of this study was to elicit students’ perceptions regarding the most facilitative and most challenging features (affordances and barriers) in a blended course design. Following the phenomenological approach of qualitative inquiry, data were collected from ten undergraduate students who had experiences in a blended learning environment. Data were collected from the students’ weekly reflection papers, interviews with students, and documents, and analyzed by structurally and texturally describing the resulting experiences and perceptions. The findings of the study indicate that used together, online and face-to-face course structures offer several opportunities and challenges for students. The participating students mentioned interaction and communication opportunities, increased motivation, increased opportunities to voice their opinions, and reinforcement of learning as the affordances in the blended learning environment. The barriers included increased workload, cultural and technical barriers, and the inter-dependence of the two environments. Implications and suggestions are offered for instructors in higher education settings.

[1]  Patrick R. Lowenthal,et al.  Investigating Perceptions of Teaching Online & F2F , 2008 .

[2]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. , 1999 .

[3]  Gordon E. McCray The hybrid course: Merging on-line instruction and the traditional classroom , 2000, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[4]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Modes of Interaction in Distance Education: Recent Developments and Research Questions , 2003 .

[5]  Rena M. Palloff,et al.  Book Review: Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom , 2007 .

[6]  Rand J. Spiro,et al.  Cognitive flexibility theory : advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains , 1988 .

[7]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centered learning environments , 2014 .

[8]  A. W. Bates,et al.  Effective Teaching with Technology in Higher Education: Foundations for Success , 2003 .

[9]  Jason D. Baker,et al.  Hybrid structures: Faculty use and perception of web-based courseware as a supplement to face-to-face instruction , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[10]  H. Klein,et al.  MOTIVATION TO LEARN AND COURSE OUTCOMES: THE IMPACT OF DELIVERY MODE, LEARNING GOAL ORIENTATION, AND PERCEIVED BARRIERS AND ENABLERS , 2006 .

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[12]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[13]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[14]  Yasemin Gülbahar,et al.  Communication and Collaboration, Satisfaction, Equity, and Autonomy in Blended Learning Environments: A Case from Turkey , 2009 .

[15]  Jackie Halliday,et al.  Instructional Technology for Teaching and Learning: Designing Instruction, Integrating Computers, and Using media , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[16]  Harvey Singh,et al.  Building Effective Blended Learning Programs , 2021, Challenges and Opportunities for the Global Implementation of E-Learning Frameworks.

[17]  Linda Futch A Study Of Blended Learning At A Metropolitan Research University , 2005 .

[18]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[19]  Mary K. Tallent-Runnels,et al.  Student outcomes and perceptions of instructors' demands and support in online and traditional classrooms , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[20]  C. Moustakas Phenomenological Research Methods , 1994 .

[21]  Karen Swan,et al.  Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses , 2001 .

[22]  Ray Jones,et al.  Using Blended Learning to Improve Student Success Rates in Learning to Program , 2003 .

[23]  M Kalantzis,et al.  The conditions of learning , 2005 .

[24]  D. Hindman The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[25]  Mike Moore,et al.  Handbook of Distance Education : Second Edition , 2013 .

[26]  Lori Kristine Tanner Case Study of the Challenges Faced by Adult Students Enrolled in an Online Blended Distance Learning Program , 2007 .

[27]  Christine Brown Building communities: The effects of offering face to face meetings to students studying at a distance , 2009 .

[28]  M. Patton Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[29]  M. Moore Editorial: Three types of interaction , 1989 .

[30]  C. Moustakas Moustakas, Clark, Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[31]  M. Manen Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy , 1990 .

[32]  R. Ellis,et al.  Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[33]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and the Use of Technology , 2007 .

[34]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Priciples and Guidlines , 2007 .

[35]  Colin Sharp Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) , 2003 .

[36]  A. Michael Huberman,et al.  An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis , 1994 .

[37]  Illawarra Mercury The Free Library , 1976 .

[38]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .

[39]  V. Chandra,et al.  Students’ perceptions of a blended web-based learning environment , 2009 .

[40]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Learning on Demand: Online Education in the United States, 2009. , 2010 .

[41]  M. David Merrill,et al.  Prescriptive Principles for Instructional Design , 2007 .

[42]  D. Garrison,et al.  Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough , 2005 .

[43]  Robert M. Gagné,et al.  The conditions of learning, 2nd ed. , 1970 .

[44]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Examining the Roles of Blended Learning Approaches in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Environments: A Delphi Study , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[45]  Susan Wainwright,et al.  Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. , 2011 .

[46]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[47]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Authentic activities and online learning , 2002 .

[48]  R. Felder,et al.  Navigating the Bumpy Road to Student-Centered Instruction , 1996 .