Effect of Catchment‐Scale Subsurface Mixing on Stream Isotopic Response

A 3.8-ha watershed on the west coast of New Zealand was instrumented with suction lysimeters and automatic water samplers to determine the relationship between subsurface isotopic and chemical concentrations to those of rainfall and resulting streamflow. A t test showed that ±2‰ represented a significant difference between successive sample deuterium values. Eleven rainfall episodes were subdivided into two categories: (1) two events where stream isotopic composition did not deflect >2‰ from prestorm values, and (2) four events which demonstrated new water flushing. Detailed analysis of one 47-mm rainfall (9.8-mm runoff) event showed that old water dominated stream water exiting the watershed by 90% using a standard two-component hydrograph separation for deuterium (corroborated by Cl and electrical conductivity). Three-component hydrograph separation indicated that 12–16% was in the form of soil water, with <5% as on-channel precipitation and 80% groundwater. Analysis of over 1000 water samples revealed systematic trends in soil water and groundwater isotopic composition both in a downslope and downprofile direction. Between-storm suction lysimeter deuterium data showed a systematic dampened response to temporally variable rainfall deuterium concentrations. Multivariate cluster analysis revealed three distinct soil water/groundwater groupings, with respect to soil depth and geographic position within the watershed. Within-storm suction lysimeter sampling preserved similar groupings, indicating that the subsurface reservoir is poorly mixed on short time scales. Understanding subsurface mixing response to rainfall should greatly improve models of episodic stream response and partitioning of storm flow into waters of different age.

[1]  Keith Beven,et al.  On hydrological heterogeneity - Catchment morphology and catchment response , 1988 .

[2]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Modeling Base Flow Soil Water Residence Times From Deuterium Concentrations , 1991 .

[3]  K. Beven,et al.  The hydrological response of headwater and sideslope areas / La réponse hydrologique des zones de cours supérieurs et des zones de pente latérale , 1978 .

[4]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Deuterium variations in storm rainfall: Implications for stream hydrograph separation , 1990 .

[5]  T. Sullivan,et al.  Variations in concentrations of aqueous aluminium and other chemical species during hydrological episodes at Birkenes, southernmost Norway , 1989 .

[6]  J. Turner,et al.  The mechanisms of catchment flow processes using natural variations in deuterium and oxygen-18 , 1987 .

[7]  R. Hawkins,et al.  FLOW PATH OF RAIN FROM THE SOIL SURFACE TO THE WATER TABLE , 1965 .

[8]  M. G. Anderson,et al.  Toward More Detailed Field Monitoring of Variable Source Areas , 1978 .

[9]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  A rationale for old water discharge through macropores in a steep, humid catchment. , 1990 .

[10]  A. Pearce,et al.  Storm runoff generation in humid headwater catchments 1 , 1986 .

[11]  E. O'Loughlin,et al.  Saturation regions in catchments and their relations to soil and topographic properties , 1981 .

[12]  M. Mosley.  Streamflow generation in a forested watershed, New Zealand , 1979 .

[13]  Max Coleman,et al.  Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis , 1982 .

[14]  D. Dewalle,et al.  Three-component tracer model for stormflow on a small Appalachian forested catchment , 1988 .

[15]  H. Craig.  Isotopic Variations in Meteoric Waters , 1961, Science.

[16]  J. Hewlett.  Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas , 1967 .

[17]  A. S. Rogowski,et al.  Chemical‐hydrologic interactions in the near‐stream zone , 1988 .

[18]  Andrew J. Pearce,et al.  Storm Runoff generation in humid headwater catchments 2. A case study of hillslope and low-order stream response , 1986 .

[19]  W. Kreutz,et al.  Tracers Determine Movement of Soil Moisture and Evapotranspiration , 1966, Science.