User-experience Based Product Development for Mass Personalization: A Case Study

Abstract Nowadays, with the rapid development of information technologies (e.g. web 2.0, cloud computing and virtual reality) and manufacturing technologies (e.g. additive manufacturing), users become more actively involved in the product development stage to create personalized products with higher efficiency. This emerging manufacturing paradigm is known as mass personalization, of which user experience (e.g. emotional factors and product utility), co-creation (e.g. user participation), and product change (e.g. modular design) are regarded as three key characteristics. In previous studies, researchers often treat each characteristic separately with an illustrative example to demonstrate its significant effect respectively. They, however, cannot fully reflect the product development process for mass personalization, and may cause inconsistency in implementing the existing methods into real cases. To fill the gap, this work proposes a three-model based (i.e. physical model, cyber model and user experience model) generic framework for conducting user experience based product development for mass personalization. A case study of a personalized smart wearable product development is described, of which the three key characteristics are considered collectively. It can also be seen as a typical case integrating the frontier techniques to enable mass personalization. The authors hope this work can provide some useful guidance to product designers and engineer-to-order companies.

[1]  Hans L Johannesson,et al.  Managing Design Change in Configurable Component Based Product Platforms , 2010 .

[2]  Mo Chen,et al.  Joint optimization of product family configuration and scaling design by Stackelberg game , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Feng Zhou,et al.  Affective and cognitive design for mass personalization: status and prospect , 2012, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[4]  G. Gemser,et al.  Benefits of Customer Codevelopment of New Products: The Moderating Effects of Utilitarian and Hedonic Radicalness , 2016 .

[5]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  GEOMETRY INTERACTIONS IN CONFIGURABLE PLATFORM MODEL , 2010 .

[6]  Frank Steiner,et al.  Embedded Toolkits for User Co-Design: A Technology Acceptance Study of Product Adaptability in the Usage Stage , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Ingi Brown,et al.  How Smart Products with Built in Flexibility Empower Users to Self -Design Their Uses? A Theoretical Framework for Use Generation , 2018 .

[8]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  Design for mass personalization , 2010 .

[9]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Product platform design: method and application , 2001 .

[10]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  User experience - a research agenda , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Joep W. Frens,et al.  Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions , 2000, DIS '00.

[12]  Edward A. Lee Cyber Physical Systems: Design Challenges , 2008, 2008 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC).

[13]  Peihua Gu,et al.  Open-architecture products , 2013 .

[14]  A Y C Nee,et al.  Adaptable design: Concepts, methods, and applications , 2009 .

[15]  David Antons,et al.  Embedded Open Toolkits for User Innovation: Postponing New Product Development Decisions into the Customer Domain , 2009, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[16]  M. Rokeach The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[17]  Johann C.K.H. Riedel,et al.  Design in the Experience Economy: Using Emotional Design for Service Innovation , 2012 .

[18]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Configuring products to address the customization-responsiveness squeeze: A survey of management issues and opportunities , 2004 .

[19]  Anders Claesson A Configurable Component Framework Supporting Platform-Based Product Development , 2006 .

[20]  Christoffer E Levandowski,et al.  A two-stage model of adaptable product platform for engineering-to-order configuration design , 2015 .

[21]  Yue Wang,et al.  Adaptive attribute selection for configurator design via Shapley value , 2011, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[22]  H. Xie *,et al.  Modelling and solving engineering product configuration problems by constraint satisfaction , 2005 .