Digital Epidermalization: Race, Identity and Biometrics

This article considers the ways in which what Paul Gilroy terms ‘epidermal thinking’ operates in the discourses surrounding certain surveillance practices and their applications, with a focus on identification documents and biometric technologies in particular. My aim is not to re-ontologize race, but instead to outline the notion of digital epidermalization, stemming from Frantz Fanon’s concept of epidermalization, as it allows for thinking through race, ontological insecurity and the ways in which the body materializes with and against biometric technologies. I examine key research in surveillance studies, governmental policy documents concerning biometric enabled identification documents and the 2003 ‘deportation’ to India of a Canadian citizen through the issuance of an expedited removal order by the US Immigration and Naturalization Services. By interrogating how digital epidermalization gains meaning and is put into practice, this article seeks to posit a space for refusals of such epidermal thinking through a critical biometric consciousness.

[1]  T. Lemke.  'The birth of bio-politics': Michel Foucault's lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality , 2001 .

[2]  Huaming Li,et al.  Facial Pose Estimation Based on the Mongolian Race's Feature Characteristic from a Monocular Image , 2004, SINOBIOMETRICS.

[3]  Shihong Lao,et al.  Vision-Based Face Understanding Technologies and Their Applications , 2004, SINOBIOMETRICS.

[4]  P. Gilroy.  Against Race: Imagining Political Culture beyond the Color Line , 2000 .

[5]  Christian Parenti,et al.  The Soft Cage: Surveillance In America From Slavery To The War On Terror , 2003 .

[6]  Mariana Valverde.  ‘Despotism’ and ethical liberal governance , 1996 .

[7]  D. Lyon.  16. Under My Skin: From Identification Papers to Body Surveillance , 2002 .

[8]  F. Fanon.  Black Skin, White Masks , 1952, My Black Stars.

[9]  S. Hartman.  Lose Your Mother: A Journey along the Atlantic Slave Route , 2007 .

[10]  Mark B. Salter,et al.  Governmentalities of an Airport: Heterotopia and Confession , 2007 .

[11]  Stuart Hall.  Introduction: Who Needs ‘Identity’? , 2011 .

[12]  Eugene Thacker,et al.  The global genome - biotechnology, politics, and culture , 2005 .

[13]  David Lyon,et al.  Technology vs ‘terrorism’: circuits of city surveillance since September 11th , 2003 .

[14]  N. Rose.  Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism , 1993 .

[15]  W. Brown.  Neo-liberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy , 2003 .

[16]  Michel Senellart.  Security, territory, population : lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78 / Michel Foucault , 2007 .

[17]  Richard Allsopp,et al.  Dictionary of Caribbean English Usage , 1996 .

[18]  Joseph Pugliese.  In Silico Race and the Heteronomy of Biometric Proxies: Biometrics in the Context of Civilian Life, Border Security and Counter-Terrorism Laws , 2005 .

[19]  O. Löfgren.  Crossing borders : The nationalization of anxiety , 1999 .

[20]  Raj Nanavati,et al.  Biometrics: Identity Verification in a Networked World , 2002 .

[21]  A. Balsamo.  Technologies of the Gendered Body: Reading Cyborg Women , 1995 .

[22]  Katherine Mckittrick.  Demonic Grounds: Black Women And The Cartographies Of Struggle , 2006 .

[23]  Einar Snekkenes,et al.  Face Recognition Issues in a Border Control Environment , 2006, ICB.

[24]  Hortense J. Spillers,et al.  Black, White, and in Color: Essays on American Literature and Culture , 2003 .

[25]  Tal Golan,et al.  :Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification , 2002 .

[26]  Simone A. Browne.  Getting Carded: Border Control and the Politics of Canada's Permanent Resident Card , 2005 .