Optimizing thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction.

M ajor advances in medicine rarely burst upon the scene fully developed and immediately applicable to a large majority of the potential beneficiaries. More commonly, after the initial studies in which the clinical value of a new discovery is demonstrated, there is a period during which the precise indications are established and "tooling up" occurs. For example, following the development of the coronary care unit, coronary artery bypass grafting, and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, it took several years to work out the precise clinical indications for the use of each of these modalities, for the training of personnel, and for the manufacture of the equipment necessary for widespread application. Thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction has now reached the stage at which the clinical value of the technique for many patients has been clearly established and is no longer in dispute,12 and it is now undergoing clinical application. However, making this form of treatment available to all or nearly all patients with myocardial infarction who can benefit from it is now an important challenge.

[1]  J. Herlitz,et al.  Eligibility for intravenous thrombolysis in suspected acute myocardial infarction. , 1990, Circulation.

[2]  H. Hod,et al.  Should thrombolytic therapy be administered in the mobile intensive care unit in patients with evolving myocardial infarction? A pilot study. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  R. Califf,et al.  At home thrombolysis. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  P. Kudenchuk,et al.  Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project--phase I: patient characteristics and feasibility of prehospital initiation of thrombolytic therapy. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  E. Ruiz,et al.  An analysis of time delays preceding thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. , 1989, JAMA.

[6]  R. Califf,et al.  From myocardial salvage to patient salvage in acute myocardial infarction: the role of reperfusion therapy. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  R. Peto,et al.  Wider inclusion criteria needed for thrombolytic therapy. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[8]  L. Ekström,et al.  Effect of a media campaign on delay times and ambulance use in suspected acute myocardial infarction. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  L. Goldman,et al.  Candidates for thrombolysis among emergency room patients with acute chest pain. Potential true- and false-positive rates. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[10]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Myocardial reperfusion, limitation of infarct size, reduction of left ventricular dysfunction, and improved survival. Should the paradigm be expanded? , 1989, Circulation.

[11]  Comparison of invasive and conservative strategies after treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) phase II trial. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  L. Bolognese,et al.  RANDOMISED TRIAL OF INTRAVENOUS STREPTOKINASE, ORAL ASPIRIN, BOTH, OR NEITHER AMONG 17 187 CASES OF SUSPECTED ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: ISIS-2 , 1988, The Lancet.

[13]  Potential time saving with pre-hospital intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Report of the European Myocardial Infarction Project (E.M.I.P) Sub-Committee. , 1988, European heart journal.

[14]  H. Fineberg,et al.  A cost-effectiveness model for coronary thrombolysis/reperfusion therapy. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  R. Balcon,et al.  What proportion of patients with myocardial infarction are suitable for thrombolysis? , 1987, British heart journal.

[16]  P. Barriot,et al.  ACHIEVEMENT OF THROMBOLYSIS AT HOME IN CASES OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION , 1987, The Lancet.

[17]  W. Littler,et al.  ELIGIBILITY FOR THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION , 1987, The Lancet.

[18]  P. Shah,et al.  Mortality and morbidity rates of patients older and younger than 75 years with acute myocardial infarction treated with intravenous streptokinase. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Implications for acute intervention related to time of hospital arrival in acute myocardial infarction. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  M. Gotsman,et al.  Prevention of myocardial damage in acute myocardial ischemia by early treatment with intravenous streptokinase. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.