Optimizing thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Herlitz,et al. Eligibility for intravenous thrombolysis in suspected acute myocardial infarction. , 1990, Circulation.
[2] H. Hod,et al. Should thrombolytic therapy be administered in the mobile intensive care unit in patients with evolving myocardial infarction? A pilot study. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[3] R. Califf,et al. At home thrombolysis. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[4] P. Kudenchuk,et al. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project--phase I: patient characteristics and feasibility of prehospital initiation of thrombolytic therapy. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[5] E. Ruiz,et al. An analysis of time delays preceding thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. , 1989, JAMA.
[6] R. Califf,et al. From myocardial salvage to patient salvage in acute myocardial infarction: the role of reperfusion therapy. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[7] R. Peto,et al. Wider inclusion criteria needed for thrombolytic therapy. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.
[8] L. Ekström,et al. Effect of a media campaign on delay times and ambulance use in suspected acute myocardial infarction. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.
[9] L. Goldman,et al. Candidates for thrombolysis among emergency room patients with acute chest pain. Potential true- and false-positive rates. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.
[10] E. Braunwald,et al. Myocardial reperfusion, limitation of infarct size, reduction of left ventricular dysfunction, and improved survival. Should the paradigm be expanded? , 1989, Circulation.
[11] Comparison of invasive and conservative strategies after treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) phase II trial. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.
[12] L. Bolognese,et al. RANDOMISED TRIAL OF INTRAVENOUS STREPTOKINASE, ORAL ASPIRIN, BOTH, OR NEITHER AMONG 17 187 CASES OF SUSPECTED ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: ISIS-2 , 1988, The Lancet.
[13] Potential time saving with pre-hospital intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Report of the European Myocardial Infarction Project (E.M.I.P) Sub-Committee. , 1988, European heart journal.
[14] H. Fineberg,et al. A cost-effectiveness model for coronary thrombolysis/reperfusion therapy. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[15] R. Balcon,et al. What proportion of patients with myocardial infarction are suitable for thrombolysis? , 1987, British heart journal.
[16] P. Barriot,et al. ACHIEVEMENT OF THROMBOLYSIS AT HOME IN CASES OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION , 1987, The Lancet.
[17] W. Littler,et al. ELIGIBILITY FOR THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION , 1987, The Lancet.
[18] P. Shah,et al. Mortality and morbidity rates of patients older and younger than 75 years with acute myocardial infarction treated with intravenous streptokinase. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.
[19] A. Jaffe,et al. Implications for acute intervention related to time of hospital arrival in acute myocardial infarction. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.
[20] M. Gotsman,et al. Prevention of myocardial damage in acute myocardial ischemia by early treatment with intravenous streptokinase. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.