Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy.

[1]  P. Westfall,et al.  Multiple comparisons and multiple tests using SAS , 2011 .

[2]  A. Buchman.  Second Annual Snowbird Conference on Clinical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Intestinal Failure March 9–12, 2006 , 2007, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[3]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Endoscopist Can Be More Powerful than Age and Male Gender in Predicting Adenoma Detection at Colonoscopy , 2007, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[4]  Paul Collins,et al.  Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy , 2007 .

[5]  J. Johanson,et al.  Effect of a Pre-Specified Minimum Colonoscopic Withdrawal Time On Adenoma Detection Rates During Screening Colonoscopy , 2006 .

[6]  J. Dominitz,et al.  Prospective Analysis of Withdrawal Times and Polyp Detection Rates During Screening Colonoscopy and a Comparison to US Multi-Society Task Force Recommendations: A Community-Based Continuous Quality Improvement Study , 2006 .

[7]  B J Ott,et al.  Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. , 2006, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[8]  H. Pohl,et al.  Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. , 2006, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[9]  Vishal Ghevariya,et al.  The Rate of Adenocarcinoma in Endoscopically Removed Colorectal Polyps , 2005, The American surgeon.

[10]  R. Hayes,et al.  Variability in flexible sigmoidoscopy performance among examiners in a screening trial. , 2005, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[11]  John F. Johanson,et al.  Variation in Adenoma Detection Rates and Colonoscopic Withdrawal Times During Screening Colonoscopy , 2005 .

[12]  C. Bernstein,et al.  A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy. , 2005, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[13]  L. Seeff,et al.  How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity. , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[14]  B. Petersen,et al.  Evaluation of Polyp Detection in Relation to Procedure Time of Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy , 2004, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[15]  Jane Wardle,et al.  Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[16]  D. Rex,et al.  Technical Performance of Colonoscopy in Patients Sedated with Nurse-Administered Propofol , 2004, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[17]  S. Wong,et al.  Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of intravenously administered hyoscine N-butyl bromide in patients undergoing colonoscopy with patient-controlled sedation. , 2004, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

[18]  David F Ransohoff,et al.  Using Risk for Advanced Proximal Colonic Neoplasia To Tailor Endoscopic Screening for Colorectal Cancer , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  Walter Willett,et al.  Risk factors for advanced colonic neoplasia and hyperplastic polyps in asymptomatic individuals. , 2003, JAMA.

[20]  C. Messina,et al.  Prevalence of colorectal neoplasia in smokers , 2003, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[21]  M. Muñoz-Navas,et al.  Use of colonoscopy as a primary screening test for colorectal cancer in average risk people , 2003, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[22]  M. Bourke,et al.  A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy. , 2003, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[23]  S. Woolf,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[24]  D. Ransohoff,et al.  Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  J. Church,et al.  Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer , 2002, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[26]  W. Cohn,et al.  Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy. , 2001, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[27]  A. Aldridge,et al.  Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size. Are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important? , 2001, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[28]  R. Houlston,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of familial colorectal cancer risk , 2001, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[29]  D. Ransohoff,et al.  Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  D. Rex,et al.  Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. , 2000, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[31]  J. Church.  Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy—timing is the key! , 1998, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[32]  E. G. Hahn,et al.  Risk of invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas assessed by size and site , 1997, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[33]  S. P. Wright,et al.  Adjusted P-values for simultaneous inference , 1992 .

[34]  J. Waye,et al.  Small colon polyps. , 1988, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[35]  S. Stryker,et al.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. , 1987, Gastroenterology.

[36]  F. Konishi,et al.  Pathology of colorectal adenomas: a colonoscopic survey. , 1982, Journal of clinical pathology.

[37]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Exact conditional tests for cross-classifications: Approximation of attained significance levels , 1979 .