Threatened and endangered species geography: characteristics of hot spots in the conterminous United States

An estimated global extinction rate that appears to be unprecedented in geological time (May 1990) has heightened concern for the increasing number of rare species. Moreover, this elevated extinction rate is being attributed to the activities of humans rather than to some calamitous natural disaster (Pimm et al. 1995). Conservation efforts to slow biodiversity loss have traditionally focused on species with few remaining individuals, based on the assumption that they are the most vulnerable to extinction (Sisk et al. 1994). Consequently, rarity has been used as an important criterion for identifying which species should be the focus of conservation efforts.

[1]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Science and the Protection of Endangered Species , 1997, Science.

[2]  M. E. Austin Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States (exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii) , 1965 .

[3]  J. Lawton,et al.  Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies , 1993, Nature.

[4]  Daniel J. Rohlf Six Biological Reasons Why the Endangered Species Act Doesn't Work—And What to Do About It , 1991 .

[5]  M. Warren,et al.  Status of Freshwater Fishes of the United States: Overview of an Imperiled Fauna , 1994 .

[6]  D. Falk From Conservation Biology to Conservation Practice: Strategies for Protecting Plant Diversity , 1992 .

[7]  The future of the US endangered species act. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  S. Olson Extinction on islands: man as a catastrophe , 1989 .

[9]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The Future of Biodiversity , 1995, Science.

[10]  Robert M. May,et al.  How many species , 1990 .

[11]  R. Green,et al.  Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists , 1979 .

[12]  Zhiliang Zhu,et al.  Forest resources of the United States, 1992. , 1993 .

[13]  D. Falk Endangered forest resources in the U.S.: Integrated strategies for conservation of rare species and genetic diversity , 1990 .

[14]  James R. Anderson,et al.  A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data , 1976 .

[15]  S. J. Brady,et al.  Changes in wetlands on nonfederal rural land of the conterminous United States from 1982 to 1987 , 1994 .

[16]  D. Wilcove,et al.  What Exactly Is an Endangered Species? An Analysis of the U.S. Endangered Species List: 1985–1991 , 1993 .

[17]  E. Komarek 8 – Effects of Fire on Temperate Forests and Related Ecosystems: Southeastern United States , 1974 .

[18]  A. Magurran Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[19]  Paul R. Ehrlich,et al.  Identifying Extinction Threats: Global Analyses of the Distribution of Biodiversity and the Expansion of the Human Enterprise , 1994 .

[20]  Federico Cheever The Road to Recovery: A New Way of Thinking About the Endangered Species Act , 1996 .

[21]  G. Orians,et al.  Endangered at What Level? , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[22]  C. Flather,et al.  Species endangerment patterns in the United States , 1994 .

[23]  Don E. McAllister,et al.  Fishes of North America Endangered, Threatened, or of Special Concern: 1989 , 1979 .