On the Performance Gain of Hybrid Decode-Amplify-Forward Cooperative Communications

We investigate the performance of adaptive decode-forward (ADF), amplify-forward (AF), and hybrid decode-amplify-forward (HDAF) relaying protocol. Specifically, we derive the closed-form expression of symbol error probability (SEP) for these three relaying protocols. For the AF protocol, we derive a simpler and more tractable final result than previously published work. Furthermore, analyzing the high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regime, we derive an asymptotically tight approximation for SEP. The approximation is used to assess an important aspect between the three different relaying protocols, i.e., the SEP performance gain of HADF over the two conventional relaying schemes ADF and AF. It is shown that the performance gain of HDAF over ADF and AF significantly depends on the relative value of channel conditions between source-to-relay and relay-to-destination links. Interestingly, it is shown that HDAF has no benefit compare to the two others if the relay is located close to the source. In contrast, the performance gains of HDAF over the ADF and AF scheme are remarkably large as the relay moves nearby the destination. Specifically, the numerical results given as well as our analysis indicate that for QPSK modulation, HDAF outperforms ADF and AF with a performance improvement by 5 dB and 6 dB, respectively.

[1]  Philip Schniter,et al.  On the achievable diversity-multiplexing tradeoff in half-duplex cooperative channels , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  A unified approach to the performance analysis of digital communication over generalized fading channels , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[3]  Mazen O. Hasna,et al.  End-to-end performance of transmission systems with relays over Rayleigh-fading channels , 2003, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..

[4]  I. M. Pyshik,et al.  Table of integrals, series, and products , 1965 .

[5]  Elza Erkip,et al.  User cooperation diversity. Part II. Implementation aspects and performance analysis , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[6]  Meng Yu,et al.  Is amplify-and-forward practically better than decode-and-forward or vice versa? , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[7]  Abbas El Gamal,et al.  Capacity theorems for the relay channel , 1979, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  Giuseppe Caire,et al.  Coding and Decoding for the Dynamic Decode and Forward Relay Protocol , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1966 .

[11]  Hesham El Gamal,et al.  Cooperative lattice coding and decoding in half-duplex channels , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[12]  Alejandro Ribeiro,et al.  Symbol error probabilities for general cooperative links , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[13]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  Cooperative strategies and capacity theorems for relay networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[14]  Elza Erkip,et al.  User cooperation diversity. Part I. System description , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[15]  Elisabeth de Carvalho,et al.  Hybrid Forwarding Scheme for Cooperative Relaying in OFDM Based Networks , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[16]  Helmut Bölcskei,et al.  Fading relay channels: performance limits and space-time signal design , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[17]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Digital Communication Over Fading Channels: A Unified Approach to Performance Analysis , 2000 .

[18]  Tiffany Jing Li,et al.  Efficient Message Relaying for Wireless User Cooperation: Decode-Amplify-Forward (DAF) and Hybrid DAF and Coded-Cooperation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.