Near-optimal estimation of radar pulse modulation waveform

In this study, the authors focus on pulse modulation waveform estimation based on a sequence of intercepted pulses from the same radar emitter. In general, modulation waveform estimators first perform pulse alignment in time and frequency separately, and then accumulate the aligned pulses to estimate the waveform. However, commonly used alignment methods may lead to considerable alignment errors which are difficult to detect and compensate, especially under low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions, resulting in non-ideal effects of accumulation. This study proposes a robust and nearly optimal modulation waveform estimation algorithm. The new algorithm first aligns pulses in time and frequency jointly via the cross-ambiguity function to avoid the transfer and accumulation of alignment errors. After that, an iterative maximum-likelihood estimator is invoked to achieve the waveform estimation. Theoretical analysis and extensive experiments show that the proposed algorithm has much smaller alignment errors and better modulation waveform and modulation parameter estimation ability than competing methods at low SNRs, and can approach the ideal case. Moreover, this algorithm does not make any assumption on the type of modulation and is computationally efficient, thus having broad applications.

[1]  Hui Xiong,et al.  An Approach to Intra-Pulse Modulation Recognition Based on the Ambiguity Function , 2010, Circuits Syst. Signal Process..

[2]  Bo Yang,et al.  Collusion-Resistant Multicast Key Distribution Based on Homomorphic One-Way Function Trees , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[3]  Bin Tang,et al.  Automatic modulation classification of radar signals using the Rihaczek distribution and hough transform , 2012 .

[4]  Wei Jiang,et al.  Comparison of unintentional frequency and phase modulation features for specific emitter identification , 2012 .

[5]  G. W. Lank,et al.  A Semicoherent Detection and Doppler Estimation Statistic , 1973, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[6]  Hongbing Ji,et al.  Quadratic time-frequency analysis and sequential recognition for specific emitter identification , 2011 .

[7]  S. Stein Algorithms for ambiguity function processing , 1981 .

[8]  J. Ianniello,et al.  Time delay estimation via cross-correlation in the presence of large estimation errors , 1982 .

[9]  Ran Tao,et al.  Two-stage method for joint time delay and Doppler shift estimation , 2008 .

[10]  Petar M. Djuric,et al.  Parameter estimation of chirp signals , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[11]  Ataollah Ebrahimzade Sherme A novel method for automatic modulation recognition , 2012, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  John F. Doherty,et al.  Modulation Recognition in Continuous Phase Modulation Using Approximate Entropy , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[13]  Bernard Mulgrew,et al.  Iterative frequency estimation by interpolation on Fourier coefficients , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.