Optimization-Based Available-To-Promise with Multi-Stage Resource Availability

Increasingly, customer service, rapid response to customer requirements, and flexibility to handle uncertainties in both demand and supply are becoming strategic differentiators in the marketplace. Organizations that want to achieve these benchmarks require sophisticated approaches to conduct order promising and fulfillment, especially in today’s high-mix low-volume production environment. Motivated by these challenges, the Available-to-Promise (ATP) function has migrated from a set of availability records in a Master Production Schedule (MPS) toward an advanced real-time decision support system to enhance decision responsiveness and quality in Assembly To Order (ATO) or Configuration To Order (CTO) environments. Advanced ATP models and systems must directly link customer orders with various forms of available resources, including both material and production capacity. In this paper, we describe a set of enhancements carried out to adapt previously published mixed-integer-programming (MIP) models to the specific requirements posed by an electronic product supply chain within Toshiba Corporation. This model can provide individual order delivery quantities and due dates, together with production schedules, for a batch of customer orders that arrive within a predefined batching interval. The model considers multi-resource availability including manufacturing orders, production capability and production capacity. In addition, the model also takes into account a variety of realistic order promising issues such as order splitting, model decomposition and resource expediting and de-expediting. We conclude this paper with comparison of our model execution results vs. actual historical performance of systems currently in place.

[1]  Paul H. Zipkin,et al.  Customer-order information, leadtimes, and inventories , 1995 .

[2]  L. Zurich,et al.  Operations Research in Production Planning, Scheduling, and Inventory Control , 1974 .

[3]  Gerald Sullivan,et al.  PROFIT: Decision Technology for Supply Chain Management at IBM Microelectronics Division , 2005 .

[4]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Due date setting with supply constraints in systems using MRP , 2001 .

[5]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Quoting manufacturing due dates subject to a service level constraint , 2000 .

[6]  Yeong-Dae Kim,et al.  A branch and bound algorithm for a production scheduling problem in an assembly system under due date constraints , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Chien-Yu Chen,et al.  Quantity and Due Date Quoting Available to Promise , 2001, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[8]  M. S. Kaylen Economic Logistics: The Optimization of Spatial and Sectoral Resource, Production, and Distribution Systems , 1991 .

[9]  William L. Berry,et al.  Manufacturing Planning and Control Systems , 1984 .

[10]  M. Ball,et al.  Available to Promise , 2004 .

[11]  R.-K. Li,et al.  Integrating order release control with due-date assignment rules , 1997 .

[12]  W. Hopp,et al.  Quoting Customer Lead Times , 1995 .

[13]  Michael O. Ball,et al.  Material compatibility constraints for make-to-order production planning , 2003, Oper. Res. Lett..

[14]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Survey of scheduling research involving due date determination decisions , 1989 .

[15]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  The Evolution of Supply-Chain-Management Models and Practice at Hewlett-Packard , 1995 .

[16]  David Letson,et al.  Economic Logistics: The Optimization of Spatial and Sectoral Resource, Production, and Distribution Systems , 1992 .