Tool use and affordance: Manipulation-based versus reasoning-based approaches.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. James,et al. The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .
[2] H. Liepmann. Drei Aufsätze aus dem Apraxiegebiet , 1908 .
[3] N. A. Bernshteĭn. The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .
[4] J. R. Simon,et al. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.
[5] A. Greenwald,et al. Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.
[6] J. J. Gibson. The theory of affordances , 1977 .
[7] J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .
[8] Steven L. Johnson. Effect of Training Device on Retention and Transfer of a Procedural Task , 1981 .
[9] K. Heilman,et al. Two forms of ideomotor apraxia , 1982, Neurology.
[10] F. Lhermitte. 'Utilization behaviour' and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[11] W H Warren,et al. Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[12] E. Roy,et al. Common Considerations In The Study of Limb, Verbal And Oral Apraxia , 1985 .
[13] K. Heilman,et al. Apraxia After a Superior Parietal Lesion , 1986, Cortex.
[14] B. Pillon,et al. Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part I: Imitation and utilization behavior: A neuropsychological study of 75 patients , 1986, Annals of neurology.
[15] W. Warren,et al. Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[16] C. Michaels. S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: Evidence of the detection of affordances. , 1988 .
[17] M. Jeannerod,et al. The timing of mentally represented actions , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.
[18] M. Turvey,et al. Visually perceiving what is reachable. , 1989 .
[19] K. Heilman,et al. Ideational apraxia: A deficit in tool selection and use , 1989, Annals of neurology.
[20] T. Shallice,et al. The origins of utilization behaviour. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[21] T. G. Reeve,et al. Research on Stimulus-Response Compatibility: Toward a Comprehensive Account , 1990 .
[22] E. A. Alluisi,et al. Things That Go Together: A Review of Stimulus-Response Compatibility and Related Effects , 1990 .
[23] A. Osman,et al. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.
[24] K. Heilman,et al. A Cognitive Neuropsychological Model of Limb Praxis , 1991 .
[25] A. Sirigu,et al. The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[26] H. Spinnler,et al. Right-sided anarchic (alien) hand: A longitudinal study , 1991, Neuropsychologia.
[27] R. Baillargeon,et al. The Development of Young Infants' Intuitions about Support , 1992 .
[28] D. Rosenbaum,et al. Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[29] M. Hallett,et al. Procedural learning in Parkinson's disease and cerebellar degeneration , 1993, Annals of neurology.
[30] C. Michaels. Destination Compatibility, Affordances, and Coding Rules: A Reply to Proctor, Van Zandt, Lu, and Weeks , 1993 .
[31] B. Hommel. Inverting the Simon effect intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. , 1993 .
[32] E. Visalberghi,et al. Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.
[33] H. Spinnler,et al. Spared and Impaired Cognitive Abilities After Bilateral Frontal Damage , 1994, Cortex.
[34] R. Proctor,et al. The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[35] Michael I. Jordan,et al. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.
[36] E. Renzi,et al. Imitation and utilisation behaviour. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.
[37] Pierre Mounoud,et al. A recursive transformation of central cognitive mechanisms : the shift from partial to whole representations , 1996 .
[38] M. Tanaka,et al. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.
[39] T Shallice,et al. The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[40] B. Wood. The oldest whodunnit in the world , 1997, Nature.
[41] W. Prinz. Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .
[42] A. Glenberg,et al. What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[43] L. Buxbaum,et al. The Role of Semantic Memory in Object Use , 1997 .
[44] S. Tipper,et al. Selective Reaching to Grasp: Evidence for Distractor Interference Effects , 1997 .
[45] T. Shallice,et al. Modality-Specific Operations in Semantic Dementia , 1997, Cortex.
[46] G. Humphreys,et al. Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[47] G. Goldenberg,et al. Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia , 1998, Neuropsychologia.
[48] G. Humphreys,et al. Visual affordances direct action: neuropsychological evidence from manual interference. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[49] R. Ellis,et al. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[50] J R Hodges,et al. "What" and "how": evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[51] D. Proffitt,et al. Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[52] K. Heilman,et al. Apraxia and motor-skill acquisition in Alzheimersdisease are dissociable , 1999, Neuropsychologia.
[53] L. Barsalou,et al. Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[54] M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al. The role of conceptual knowledge in object use evidence from semantic dementia. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[55] T. Shallice,et al. CONTENTION SCHEDULING AND THE CONTROL OF ROUTINE ACTIVITIES , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[56] R. Ellis,et al. Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. , 2000, British journal of psychology.
[57] G. Humphreys,et al. The Role of Semantic Knowledge and Working Memory in Everyday Tasks , 2000, Brain and Cognition.
[58] R. Cubelli,et al. Cognition in Action: Testing a Model of Limb Apraxia , 2000, Brain and Cognition.
[59] D. Povinelli. Folk physics for apes , 2000 .
[60] L. Buxbaum,et al. The Role of the Dynamic Body Schema in Praxis: Evidence from Primary Progressive Apraxia , 2000, Brain and Cognition.
[61] Michael R. Neiman,et al. The assessment of limb apraxia: Relationship between performances on single- and multiple-object tasks by left hemisphere damaged aphasic subjects , 2000 .
[62] G. Aschersleben,et al. The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[63] R. Ellis,et al. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization , 2001 .
[64] L. Buxbaum. Ideomotor Apraxia: a Call to Action , 2001, Neurocase.
[65] M. Jeannerod. Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.
[66] J. Riddoch,et al. Visual affordances and object selection , 2001 .
[67] D. Rosenbaum,et al. Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. , 2001, Psychological review.
[68] S. Anderson,et al. Attentional processes link perception and action , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[69] R. Ward,et al. S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation , 2002 .
[70] L. Buxbaum,et al. Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects , 2002, Brain and Language.
[71] J. Decety,et al. Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.
[72] J. Hodges,et al. When objects lose their meaning: What happens to their use? , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[73] J. Hodges,et al. Apraxia, mechanical problem solving and semantic knowledge , 2002, Journal of Neurology.
[74] G. Humphreys,et al. Modelling direct perceptual constraints on action selection: The Naming and Action Model (NAM) , 2002 .
[75] H. Bekkering,et al. Visual Search Is Modulated by Action Intentions , 2002, Psychological science.
[76] Robert E. Shaw,et al. The Agent-Environment Interface: Simon's Indirect or Gibson's Direct Coupling? , 2003 .
[77] R. Klatzky,et al. Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.
[78] R. Passingham,et al. Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.
[79] David B. Miller,et al. Nested reciprocities: the organism-environment system in perception-action and development. , 2003, Developmental psychobiology.
[80] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.
[81] D. Rosenbaum,et al. Grasping the meaning of words , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.
[82] Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al. The Role of Effort in Perceiving Distance , 2003, Psychological science.
[83] Scott H. Johnson-Frey. What's So Special about Human Tool Use? , 2003, Neuron.
[84] A. Borghi. Object concepts and action: extracting affordances from objects parts. , 2004, Acta psychologica.
[85] R. Ellis,et al. Action priming by briefly presented objects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.
[86] Gereon R. Fink,et al. Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects , 2004, NeuroImage.
[87] John R Anderson,et al. An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.
[88] Scott H. Johnson-Frey. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[89] A. Maravita,et al. Tools for the body (schema) , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[90] M. Jeannerod,et al. The motor theory of social cognition: a critique , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[91] W. Epstein,et al. Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[92] L. Buxbaum,et al. Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[93] G. Humphreys,et al. Direct and indirect effects of action on object classification , 2005, Memory & cognition.
[94] Scott T. Grafton,et al. A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.
[95] A. Borghi. Grounding Cognition: Object Concepts and Action , 2005 .
[96] J. Hermsdörfer,et al. It takes the whole brain to make a cup of coffee: the neuropsychology of naturalistic actions involving technical devices , 2005, Neuropsychologia.
[97] Ed Symes,et al. Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances , 2005 .
[98] D. Proffitt. Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[99] Tao Wu,et al. The role of the dorsal stream for gesture production , 2006, NeuroImage.
[100] A. Sirigu,et al. How we interact with objects: learning from brain lesions , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[101] S. Tipper,et al. Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[102] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: manipulation knowledge of objects , 2006, Cognition.
[103] R. Ellis,et al. The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorisation in visual memory. , 2006, Acta psychologica.
[104] L. Buxbaum,et al. Neural substrates of knowledge of hand postures for object grasping and functional object use: Evidence from fMRI , 2006, Brain Research.
[105] Markus Graf,et al. The role of action representations in visual object recognition , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.
[106] G. Goldenberg,et al. Relationship between Object-Related Gestures and the Fractionated Object Knowledge System , 2007, Behavioural neurology.
[107] B. Hommel,et al. Controlling attention through action: Observing actions primes action-related stimulus dimensions , 2007, Neuropsychologia.
[108] Derek C. Penn,et al. Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: a comparative, critical review. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.
[109] Paul Cisek,et al. Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[110] W. Prinz,et al. Programming tool-use actions. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[111] G. Humphreys,et al. Dissociative effects of viewpoint and semantic priming on action and semantic decisions: Evidence for dual routes to action from vision , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[112] James N. Lee,et al. The influence of complex action knowledge on representations of novel graspable objects: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.
[113] W. Prinz,et al. Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[114] G. Gigli,et al. Degraded Semantic Knowledge And Accurate Object Use , 2007, Cortex.
[115] Amy M. Masnick,et al. The Development of Causal Reasoning , 2007 .
[116] Gregor Schöner,et al. Toward a new theory of motor synergies. , 2007, Motor control.
[117] Adrienne D. Moll,et al. Abnormal reliance on object structure in apraxics' learning of novel object-related actions , 2007, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.
[118] T. Chaminade,et al. The evolutionary neuroscience of tool making , 2007, Neuropsychologia.
[119] Ed Symes,et al. Visual object affordances: object orientation. , 2007, Acta psychologica.
[120] G. Goldenberg,et al. The Impact of Dysexecutive Syndrome on Use of Tools and Technical Devices , 2007, Cortex.
[121] W. Prinz,et al. Activation of action rules in action observation. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[122] D. Bub,et al. Kicking Calculators: Contribution of Embodied Representations to Sentence Comprehension. , 2008 .
[123] F. Osiurak,et al. Different constraints on grip selection in brain-damaged patients: Object use versus object transport , 2008, Neuropsychologia.
[124] George S. Cree,et al. Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words , 2008, Cognition.
[125] F. Osiurak,et al. Object utilization and object usage: A single-case study , 2008, Neurocase.
[126] D. Proffitt,et al. Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[127] L. Riggio,et al. The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect. , 2008, Acta Psychologica.
[128] L. Vainio,et al. On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects , 2008, Cognition.
[129] A. Mack,et al. Potentiation of action by undetected affordant objects , 2008 .
[130] E. Biryukova,et al. Organization of goal-directed action at a high level of motor skill: the case of stone knapping in India. , 2008, Motor control.
[131] Guy Vingerhoets,et al. Knowing about tools: Neural correlates of tool familiarity and experience , 2008, NeuroImage.
[132] Derek C. Penn,et al. Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[133] John K. Tsotsos,et al. An Attentional Mechanism for Selecting Appropriate Actions Afforded by Graspable Objects , 2008, Psychological science.
[134] L. Vainio,et al. Grasp preparation improves change detection for congruent objects. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[135] M. Kiefer,et al. Action observation can prime visual object recognition , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.
[136] Lucia Riggio,et al. Sentence comprehension and simulation of object temporary, canonical and stable affordances , 2009, Brain Research.
[137] Lawrence W Barsalou,et al. Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[138] M. Silveri,et al. Semantic memory in object use , 2009, Neuropsychologia.
[139] G. Vingerhoets,et al. Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances , 2009, Brain and Cognition.
[140] G. Goldenberg. Apraxia and the parietal lobes , 2009, Neuropsychologia.
[141] G. Goldenberg,et al. The neural basis of tool use. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[142] J. Besnard,et al. Contrôle exécutif et comportement d'utilisation d'objets : vers une dissociation , 2009 .
[143] W. Prinz,et al. Movements, actions and tool-use actions: an ideomotor approach to imitation , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[144] Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al. The effects of handedness and reachability on perceived distance. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[145] G. Orban,et al. The Representation of Tool Use in Humans and Monkeys: Common and Uniquely Human Features , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[146] F. Osiurak,et al. Unusual use of objects after unilateral brain damage. The technical reasoning model , 2009, Cortex.
[147] Alice C. Roy,et al. Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema , 2009, Current Biology.
[148] B. Hommel. Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding) , 2009, Psychological research.
[149] Dietmar Heinke,et al. MODELING VISUAL AFFORDANCES: THE SELECTIVE ATTENTION FOR ACTION MODEL (SAAM) , 2009 .
[150] Gilles Dietrich,et al. The role of expertise in tool use: skill differences in functional action adaptations to task constraints. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[151] R. Nicoletti,et al. Simon-Like and Functional Affordance Effects with Tools: The Effects of Object Perceptual Discrimination and Object Action State , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[152] L. Buxbaum,et al. Action knowledge, visuomotor activation, and embodiment in the two action systems , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[153] Lewis A. Wheaton,et al. The Neuroscience of Storing and Molding Tool Action Concepts: How “Plastic” is Grounded Cognition? , 2010, Front. Psychology.
[154] Ed Symes,et al. When Motor Attention Improves Selective Attention: The Dissociating Role of Saliency , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[155] D. Bub,et al. Grasping beer mugs: on the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[156] Steven A. Jax,et al. Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object , 2010, Cognition.
[157] R. Proctor,et al. The object-based Simon effect: grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[158] R. Nicoletti,et al. On the relationship between affordance and Simon effects: Are the effects really independent? , 2011 .
[159] D. Parisi,et al. TRoPICALS: a computational embodied neuroscience model of compatibility effects. , 2010, Psychological review.
[160] Sally A. Linkenauger,et al. A Functional Role for Motor Simulation in Identifying Tools , 2010, Psychological science.
[161] F. Osiurak,et al. Grasping the affordances, understanding the reasoning: toward a dialectical theory of human tool use. , 2010, Psychological review.
[162] S. Tipper,et al. Gesturing Meaning: Non-action Words Activate the Motor System , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[163] R. Bongers,et al. Joint angle variability and co-variation in a reaching with a rod task , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.
[164] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Impaired access to manipulation features in Apraxia: Evidence from eyetracking and semantic judgment tasks , 2010, Brain and Language.
[165] Jonathan R. Zadra,et al. Direct Evidence for the Economy of Action: Glucose and the Perception of Geographical Slant , 2010, Perception.
[166] D. Le Gall,et al. Utilization behavior: Clinical and theoretical approaches , 2010, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.
[167] Gaetano Tieri,et al. Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.
[168] T. Shallice,et al. Manipulability and object recognition: is manipulability a semantic feature? , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.
[169] Craig S. Chapman,et al. To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.
[170] F. Osiurak,et al. Re-examining the gesture engram hypothesis. New perspectives on apraxia of tool use , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[171] J. C. Mizelle,et al. Testing perceptual limits of functional units: Are there “automatic” tendencies to associate tools and objects? , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.
[172] D. Gall,et al. A contribution to the study of environmental dependency phenomena: The social hypothesis , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[173] R. Proctor,et al. Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[174] V. Gallese,et al. Tool-use observation makes far objects ready-to-hand , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[175] D. Bub,et al. Priming of reach and grasp actions by handled objects. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[176] Domenico Parisi,et al. Objects, spatial compatibility, and affordances: A connectionist study , 2011, Cognitive Systems Research.
[177] G. Vingerhoets,et al. Neural correlates of pantomiming familiar and unfamiliar tools: Action semantics versus mechanical problem solving? , 2011, Human brain mapping.
[178] K. Yarrow,et al. Viewing objects and planning actions: On the potentiation of grasping behaviours by visual objects , 2011, Brain and Cognition.
[179] E. Brenner,et al. Using a Stick Does Not Necessarily Alter Judged Distances or Reachability , 2011, PloS one.
[180] S. Tipper,et al. Object affordance and spatial-compatibility effects in Parkinson's disease , 2011, Cortex.
[181] M. Costantini,et al. The space of affordances: A TMS study , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[182] J. Witt. Tool use influences perceived shape and perceived parallelism, which serve as indirect measures of perceived distance. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[183] James R. Brockmole,et al. Compressing perceived distance with remote tool-use: real, imagined, and remembered. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[184] L. Wheaton,et al. One hand, two objects: Emergence of affordance in contexts , 2012, Brain and Cognition.
[185] F. Osiurak,et al. Tool use and perceived distance: when unreachable becomes spontaneously reachable , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.
[186] D. Bub,et al. On the dynamics of action representations evoked by names of manipulable objects. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[187] A. Cangelosi,et al. Electrophysiological Examination of Embodiment in Vision and Action , 2012, Psychological science.
[188] M. Grossman,et al. Everyday Action Impairment in Parkinson's Disease Dementia , 2012, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.
[189] F. Osiurak,et al. Mechanical problem-solving strategies in left-brain damaged patients and apraxia of tool use , 2013, Neuropsychologia.
[190] S. Thompson-Schill,et al. Manual Experience Shapes Object Representations , 2013, Psychological science.
[191] F. Binkofski,et al. Two action systems in the human brain , 2013, Brain and Language.
[192] R. Proctor,et al. Object-based correspondence effects for action-relevant and surface-property judgments with keypress responses: evidence for a basis in spatial coding , 2013, Psychological research.
[193] S. Cappa,et al. Neural representations of unfamiliar objects are modulated by sensorimotor experience , 2013, Cortex.
[194] S. Grant,et al. Binocular vision enhances a rapidly evolving affordance priming effect: Behavioural and TMS evidence , 2013, Brain and Cognition.
[195] Gunnar Declerck,et al. Why motor simulation cannot explain affordance perception , 2013, Adapt. Behav..
[196] F. Osiurak. Apraxia of tool use is not a matter of affordances , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[197] T. Ziemke,et al. Theories and computational models of affordance and mirror systems: An integrative review , 2013, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[198] Tetsushi Nonaka,et al. Motor Variability but Functional Specificity: The Case of a C4 Tetraplegic Mouth Calligrapher , 2013 .
[199] F. Osiurak,et al. Handing a tool to someone can take more time than using it , 2013, Cognition.
[200] Steven A. Jax,et al. Response interference between functional and structural object-related actions is increased in patients with ideomotor apraxia. , 2013, Journal of neuropsychology.
[201] D. Mirman,et al. Incidental and context-responsive activation of structure- and function-based action features during object identification. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[202] F. Osiurak,et al. Apraxia of tool use: More evidence for the technical reasoning hypothesis , 2013, Cortex.
[203] F. Osiurak,et al. Within reach but not so reachable: Obstacles matter in visual perception of distances , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[204] G. Humphreys,et al. Action relations affect affordance selection: Evidence from visuomotor responses to paired objects , 2014 .
[205] Laurel J Buxbaum,et al. Uncovering the architecture of action semantics. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[206] G. Vingerhoets. Contribution of the posterior parietal cortex in reaching, grasping, and using objects and tools , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[207] D. Mirman,et al. Abnormal dynamics of activation of object use information in apraxia: Evidence from eyetracking , 2014, Neuropsychologia.
[208] F. Osiurak. What Neuropsychology Tells us About Human Tool Use? The Four Constraints Theory (4CT): Mechanics, Space, Time, and Effort , 2014, Neuropsychology Review.
[209] François Osiurak,et al. Getting a tool gives wings: overestimation of tool-related benefits in a motor imagery task and a decision task , 2014, Psychological research.
[210] François Osiurak,et al. What about mechanical knowledge?: Comment on "Action semantics: A unifying conceptual framework for the selective use of multimodal and modality-specific object knowledge" by van Elk, van Schie, and Bekkering. , 2014, Physics of life reviews.
[211] A. Borghi. Affordances and contextual flexibility: Comment on "Action semantics: A unifying conceptual framework for the selective use of multimodal and modality-specific object knowledge" by Michiel van Elk, Hein van Schie and Harold Bekkering. , 2014, Physics of life reviews.
[212] L. Buxbaum,et al. Visual context modulates potentiation of grasp types during semantic object categorization , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[213] Zissis Pappas. Dissociating Simon and affordance compatibility effects: Silhouettes and photographs , 2014, Cognition.
[214] Guy A. Orban,et al. The neural basis of human tool use , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[215] Harold Bekkering,et al. Action semantics: A unifying conceptual framework for the selective use of multimodal and modality-specific object knowledge. , 2014, Physics of life reviews.
[216] F. Osiurak. Tool use and manual actions: The human body as a means versus an end , 2014, Cortex.
[217] François Osiurak,et al. Tool use disorders after left brain damage , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[218] Michiel van Elk,et al. The left inferior parietal lobe represents stored hand-postures for object use and action prediction , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[219] F. Osiurak,et al. Pliers, not fingers: Tool-action effect in a motor intention paradigm , 2014, Cognition.
[220] G. Goldenberg. Apraxia – The cognitive side of motor control , 2013, Cortex.
[221] Christine E. Watson,et al. A distributed network critical for selecting among tool-directed actions , 2015, Cortex.
[222] Dietmar Heinke,et al. Implied actions between paired objects lead to affordance selection by inhibition. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[223] F. Osiurak,et al. A goal-based mechanism for delayed motor intention: considerations from motor skills, tool use and action memory , 2015, Psychological research.