An empirical analysis of Singapore households’ upgrading mobility behaviour: from public homeownership to private homeownership

Abstract In contrast to international experiences, Singapore observes a special type of housing related mobility where its public homeowners continually seek to upgrade to private housing. Empirical results have shown that the rising trend of such social mobility has significantly contributed to the volatility of private housing prices. This paper is aimed at analysing why the public homeowners in Singapore prefer to upgrade to private housing. Using a housing choice model with logit regression, the analysis throws light on what determines public homeowners’ upgrading behaviour and what are the wider consequences of such behaviour.

[1]  A. L. Grange.  Privatising Public Housing in Hong Kong: Its Impact on Equity , 1998 .

[2]  Price Discovery between Private and Public Housing Markets , 2002 .

[3]  Kavita Datta,et al.  Housing and Finance in Developing Countries , 1998 .

[4]  Yannis M. Ioannides,et al.  STRUCTURAL ESTIMATION OF RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY AND HOUSING TENURE CHOICE* , 2006 .

[5]  K. Hancock.  'Can Pay? Won't Pay?' or Economic Principles of 'Affordability' , 1993 .

[6]  Christopher Curran,et al.  A theory of residential location decisions of two-worker households , 1982 .

[7]  J. Madden.  Why Women Work Closer to Home , 1981 .

[8]  J. Perloff.  Choice of Housing Tenure and Wage Compensation of Hired Agricultural Workers , 1991 .

[9]  Yong Tu,et al.  A Two-stage Housing Choice Forecasting Model , 1996 .

[10]  The Macro Impacts of Public Resold Dwellings on Private Housing Prices in Singapore , 2003 .

[11]  W. Clark,et al.  Household characteristics and tenure choice in the U.S. housing market , 1990 .

[12]  Yannis M. Ioannides.  Residential mobility and housing tenure choice , 1987 .

[13]  D. Tse,et al.  Housing Choice Behavior of Urban Workers in China's Transition to a Housing Market , 2000 .

[14]  Chua Beng Huat,et al.  Public Housing Residents as Clients of the State , 2000 .

[15]  C. Horioka.  Tenure choice and housing demand in Japan , 1988 .

[16]  A. Börsch-Supan.  Econometric Analysis of Discrete Choice : With Applications on the Demand for Housing in the United States and West Germany , 1987 .

[17]  James Lee.  From Welfare Housing to Home Ownership: The Dilemma of China's Housing Reform , 2000 .

[18]  G. Paulin.  A Comparison of Consumer Expenditures by Housing Tenure , 1995 .

[19]  M. White,et al.  A model of residential location choice and commuting by men and women workers. , 1977, Journal of regional science.

[20]  Nico J. D. Nagelkerke,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of functional relationships , 1992 .

[21]  Clifford R. Kern,et al.  A model of workplace and residence choice in two-worker households , 1997 .

[22]  J. Brueckner.  The downpayment constraint and housing tenure choice: A simplified exposition , 1986 .

[23]  Robbie B. H. Goh.  Ideologies of `Upgrading' in Singapore Public Housing: Post-modern Style, Globalisation and Class Construction in the Built Environment , 2001 .

[24]  S. Rosenthal.  A residence time model of housing markets , 1988 .

[25]  D. Jimenez Emmanuel Urb Keare,et al.  Progressive development and affordability in the design of urban shelter projects , 1983 .

[26]  E. Werczberger,et al.  Privatisation of public housing in Israel: Inconsistency or complementarity? , 1993 .

[27]  Yong Tu.  Public Homeownership, Housing Finance and Socioeconomic Development in Singapore , 1999 .

[28]  P. Blackley,et al.  A Limited Joint-Choice Model for Discrete and Continuous Housing Characteristics , 1988 .

[29]  D. Fullerton,et al.  A General Equilibrium Model of Housing, Taxes, and Portfolio Choice , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.