Spatial Accuracy of UAV-Derived Orthoimagery and Topography: Comparing Photogrammetric Models Processed with Direct Geo-Referencing and Ground Control Points

Mapping with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) typically involves the deployment of ground control points (GCPs) to georeference the images and topographic model. An alternative approach is direct geo ref er encing, whereby the onboard Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and inertial measurement unit are used without GCPs to locate and orient the data. This study compares the spatial accuracy of these approaches using two nearly identical UAVs. The onboard GNSS is the one difference between them, as one vehicle uses a survey-grade GNSS/RTK receiver (RTK UAV), while the other uses a lower-grade GPS receiver (non-RTK UAV). Field testing was performed at a gravel pit, with all ground measurements and aerial sur vey ing completed on the same day. Three sets of orthoimages and DSMs were produced for comparing spa tial accuracies: two sets were created by direct georeferencing images from the RTK UAV and non-RTK UAV and one set was created by using GCPs during the external orientation of the non-RTK UAV ima...

[1]  F. E. Grubbs Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples , 1969 .

[2]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[3]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Accuracy of Airborne Lidar-Derived Elevation: Empirical Assessment and Error Budget , 2004 .

[4]  C. Strecha,et al.  The Accuracy of Automatic Photogrammetric Techniques on Ultra-light UAV Imagery , 2012 .

[5]  Ryan R. Jensen,et al.  Small-Scale Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Environmental Remote Sensing: Challenges and Opportunities , 2011 .

[6]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of Georeferenced Point Clouds Produced via Multi-View Stereopsis from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[7]  Brian J. Moorman,et al.  Small unmanned aircraft systems for remote sensing and Earth science research , 2012 .

[8]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[9]  C. Hugenholtz,et al.  Geomorphological mapping with a small unmanned aircraft system (sUAS): Feature detection and accuracy assessment of a photogrammetrically-derived digital terrain model , 2013 .

[10]  Mark A. Fonstad,et al.  Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement , 2013 .

[11]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Direct Georeferencing of Ultrahigh-Resolution UAV Imagery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  F. Nex,et al.  UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review , 2014 .

[13]  WhiteheadKen,et al.  Remote sensing of the environment with small unmanned aircraft systems (UASs), part 1: a review of progress and challenges1 , 2014 .

[14]  Brett C. Eaton,et al.  Remote sensing of the environment with small unmanned aircraft systems (UASs), part 2: scientific and commercial applications , 2014 .

[15]  Chris H. Hugenholtz,et al.  Earthwork Volumetrics with an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Softcopy Photogrammetry , 2015 .

[16]  A. Tamminga,et al.  UAS‐based remote sensing of fluvial change following an extreme flood event , 2015 .

[17]  A. Tamminga,et al.  Hyperspatial Remote Sensing of Channel Reach Morphology and Hydraulic Fish Habitat Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV): A First Assessment in the Context of River Research and Management , 2015 .

[18]  C. Hugenholtz,et al.  Applying ASPRS Accuracy Standards to Surveys from Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) , 2015 .