Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research

[1]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[2]  Charles A. Hart.  Creative Intuition in Art and Poetry , 1954 .

[3]  Leo Meitzer,et al.  Scientific Productivity in Organizational Settings , 1956 .

[4]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[5]  F. M. Andrews,et al.  Creativity and the scientist , 1962 .

[6]  L. Meltzer,et al.  Organizational Structure and the Performance and Job Satisfaction of Physiologists , 1962 .

[7]  The “creative years” and the research environment , 1964 .

[8]  D. Crane.  Scientists at major and minor universities: a study of productivity and recognition. , 1965, American sociological review.

[9]  Donald C. Pelz,et al.  Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development , 1967 .

[10]  J. R. Cole,et al.  Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science. , 1967, American sociological review.

[11]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Scientists in Organizations , 1968 .

[12]  Moritz Schlick,et al.  Knowing and Being , 1974 .

[13]  B. Reskin.  Scientific Productivity and the Reward Structure of Science , 1977 .

[14]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States: , 1979 .

[15]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development , 1967 .

[16]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[17]  K. Knorr-Cetina.  The Manufacture of Knowledge , 1981 .

[18]  Richard S. Mansfield,et al.  The Psychology of Creativity and Discovery: Scientists and Their Work , 1981 .

[19]  J. S. Long,et al.  Organizational Context and Scientific Productivity , 1981 .

[20]  Karin D. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science ed. by Karin D. Knorr-Cetina, Michael Mulkay (review) , 1983 .

[21]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[22]  Alan W. Pearson,et al.  Managing interdisciplinary research , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[23]  David D. Dill,et al.  Theory versus Practice in the Staffing of R&D Laboratories : R&D Management , 1985 .

[24]  L. Baird,et al.  What characterizes a productive research department? , 1986 .

[25]  H. Zuckerman.  The sociology of science. , 1988 .

[26]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[27]  J. S. Long,et al.  DEPARTMENTAL EFFECTS ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY , 1990 .

[28]  R. Osche,et al.  Before the gates of excellence: the determinants of creative genius , 1990 .

[29]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists , 1991 .

[30]  C. Bland,et al.  Characteristics of a productive research environment: literature review , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[31]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Cold Fusion and Hot History , 1992, Osiris.

[32]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  Prometheus Bound: science in a dynamic steady state , 1995, European Review.

[33]  H. Stumpf,et al.  Scientific creativity: A short overview , 1995 .

[34]  Galina F. Gordukalova.  : Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States , 1997 .

[35]  Todd Lubart,et al.  Creativity as Investment , 1997 .

[36]  Expansion And Structural Change , 1997 .

[37]  K. Dunbar.  How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. , 1997 .

[38]  Craig K. Pepin.  Expansion and Structural Change: Higher Education in Germany, the United States, and Japan, 1870-1990 , 1998, History of Education Quarterly.

[39]  K. K. Cetina.  Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge , 1999 .

[40]  M. Henkel,et al.  The modernisation of research evaluation: The case of the UK , 1999 .

[41]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[42]  L. Butler,et al.  The efficacy of different modes of funding research: perspectives from Australian data on the biological sciences , 1999 .

[43]  D. Simonton.  Origins of genius : Darwinian perspectives on creativity , 1999 .

[44]  R. Whitley,et al.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 2000 .

[45]  Rogers Hollingsworth,et al.  11. Major Discoveries and Biomedical Research Organizations: Perspectives on Interdisciplinarity, Nurturing Leadership, and Integrated Structure and Cultures , 2000 .

[46]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows , 2000 .

[47]  Individuelle Kreativität und kollektives Ergebnis , 2000 .

[48]  Jan-Erik Lane,et al.  New Public Management , 2021, Bangladesh Journal of Public Administration.

[49]  Liv Langfeldt,et al.  The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Review, and Their Effects on the Review Outcome , 2001, Peer review in an Era of Evaluation.

[50]  Philip Shapira,et al.  Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation , 2001 .

[51]  Wesley Shrum,et al.  The organization of scientific collaborations , 2002 .

[52]  M. Mumford,et al.  Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships , 2002 .

[53]  Robert I. Sutton,et al.  Weird Ideas That Spark Innovation , 2002 .

[54]  J. Hollingsworth,et al.  Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research , 2002 .

[55]  Sharon Bailin.  CREATIVITY IN CONTEXT , 2002 .

[56]  I. Verma.  The Common Thread: A Story of Science, Politics, Ethics and the Human Genome , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[57]  R. Florida.  The Rise of the Creative Class : And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life , 2003 .

[58]  Jason Owen-Smith,et al.  From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities , 2003 .

[59]  Nick von Tunzelmann,et al.  The Effects of Size on Research Performance: A SPRU Review , 2003 .

[60]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[61]  Walter Berka,et al.  Woher kommt das Neue? Kreativität in Wissenschaft und Kunst , 2003 .

[62]  G. Laudel.  The art of getting funded: How scientists adapt to their funding conditions , 2006 .

[63]  R. Rosenberg.  The Common Thread: A Story of Science, Politics, Ethics, and the Human Genome , 2003 .

[64]  H. Etzkowitz.  Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[65]  S. Durmusoglu.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[66]  Darwin H. Stapleton,et al.  Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research , 2004 .

[67]  Simon Rodan,et al.  More than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness , 2004 .

[68]  D. Simonton.  Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist , 2004 .

[69]  Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of The Rockefeller University , 2004 .

[70]  Michèle Lamont,et al.  What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences? , 2004 .

[71]  Carl Martin Allwood,et al.  Creative knowledge environments. The influences on creativity in research and innovation , 2004 .

[72]  Joachim Schummer,et al.  Discovering the nanoscale , 2004 .

[73]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[74]  Thomas Heinze,et al.  Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in Europe : Analysis of Publications and Patent Applications including Comparisons with the United States , 2004 .

[75]  Arne Hessenbruch,et al.  Nanotechnology and the Negotiation of Novelty , 2004 .

[76]  David Obstfeld.  Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[77]  S. Daniels.  Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized. , 2005 .

[78]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[79]  U. Schimank,et al.  ‘New Public Management’ and the Academic Profession: Reflections on the German Situation , 2005 .

[80]  John Blau.  Europe Seeks Greater Creativity in Basic Research , 2005 .

[81]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[82]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies , 2006 .

[83]  Marius T.H. Meeus,et al.  Innovation, science, and institutional change , 2006 .

[84]  Philippe Larédo,et al.  Changing patterns of public research funding in France , 2007 .

[85]  Thomas Heinze,et al.  Characterizing creative scientists in nano-S&T: Productivity, multidisciplinarity, and network brokerage in a longitudinal perspective , 2007, Scientometrics.

[86]  D. Jansen,et al.  New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations , 2007 .

[87]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[88]  Philip Shapira,et al.  Identifying creative research accomplishments: Methodology and results for nanotechnology and human genetics , 2007, Scientometrics.

[89]  James G. March,et al.  The Study of Organizations and Organizing Since 1945 , 2007 .

[90]  L. Fleming,et al.  Collaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success , 2007 .

[91]  P. V. D. Besselaar,et al.  Comparing the evolution of national research policies: what patterns of change? , 2007 .

[92]  T. Heinze,et al.  Governanceregimes im Wandel , 2008 .

[93]  Thomas Heinze,et al.  How to sponsor ground-breaking research: a comparison of funding schemes , 2008 .

[94]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Across institutional boundaries?: Research collaboration in German public sector nanoscience , 2008 .

[95]  J. Youtie,et al.  Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocs , 2008 .

[96]  Richard Münch.  Stratifikation durch Evaluation: Mechanismen der Konstruktion von Statushierarchien in der Forschung / Stratification by Evaluation: Mechanisms of Constructing Status Hierarchies in Research , 2008 .

[97]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries , 2009 .

[98]  M. Lorenzen.  Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[99]  Pablo Forni,et al.  The travels and adventures of serendipity. A study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science , 2012 .