Competition, Contractibility, and the Market for Donors to Nonprofits

This article investigates theoretically and empirically the effects of competition for donors on the behavior of nonprofit organizations. Theoretically, we consider a situation in which nonprofit organizations use donations to produce some commodity, but the use of donations is only partially contractible. The main results of the model indicate that an increase in competition (i) decreases the fraction of donations allocated to perquisite consumption and (ii) increases the fraction of donations allocated to promotional expenditures. Moreover, the effects of competition are magnified by the ability to contract on the use of donations. These hypotheses are tested with data on the expenditures of nonprofit organizations in a number of subsectors where competition is primarily local. We use across-metropolitan statistical areas' variation to measure differences in competition and proxy contractibility by the importance of tangible assets, which are more easily observed by donors. The estimated effects of competition and contractibility are consistent with our model.

[1]  W. Randolph,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF TAX REFORM ON CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS , 1992, National Tax Journal.

[2]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Entry and Competition in Concentrated Markets , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Alessandro Lizzeri,et al.  The Role of Commitment in Dynamic Contracts: Evidence from Life Insurance , 2000 .

[4]  E. Glaeser The Governance of Not-for-Profit Firms , 2002 .

[5]  Susan Rose-Ackerman,et al.  Charitable Giving and “Excessive” Fundraising , 1982 .

[6]  Bruce R. Kingma An Accurate Measurement of the Crowd-out Effect, Income Effect, and Price Effect for Charitable Contributions , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  James Andreoni,et al.  Do Government Grants to Private Charities Crowd Out Giving or Fund-raising? , 2003 .

[8]  J. Newhouse Toward a Theory of Nonprofit Institutions: An Economic Model of a Hospital , 1970 .

[9]  J. Andreoni,et al.  Public goods experiments without confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising , 2004 .

[10]  Susan Feigenbaum,et al.  Competition and Performance in the Nonprofit Sector: The Case of U.S. Medical Research Charities , 1987 .

[11]  Burton A. Weisbrod,et al.  Toward a Theory of the Voluntary Nonprofit Sector in a Three-Sector Economy , 1986 .

[12]  William S. Reece,et al.  Charitable Contributions: New Evidence on Household Behavior , 1979 .

[13]  K. Crocker,et al.  Contracting with Limited Commitment: Evidence from Employment-Based Health Insurance Contracts , 2002, The Rand journal of economics.

[14]  H. Varian,et al.  On the private provision of public goods , 1986 .

[15]  T. Philipson,et al.  Nonprofit Production and Competition , 1998 .

[16]  J. Andreoni Privately provided public goods in a large economy: The limits of altruism , 1988 .

[17]  E. Fama,et al.  Agency Problems and Residual Claims , 1983 .

[18]  Susan Rose-Ackerman,et al.  Altruism, Nonprofits, and Economic Theory , 1996 .

[19]  Al Slivinski Team Incentives and Organizational Form , 2002 .

[20]  J. Andreoni IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC GOODS: A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING* , 1990 .