Topology, criticality, and dynamically generated qubits in a stochastic measurement-only Kitaev model

We consider a paradigmatic solvable model of topological order in two dimensions, Kitaev's honeycomb Hamiltonian, and turn it into a measurement-only dynamics consisting of stochastic measurements of two-qubit bond operators. We find an entanglement phase diagram that resembles that of the Hamiltonian problem in some ways, while being qualitatively different in others. When one type of bond is dominantly measured, we find area-law entangled phases that protect two topological qubits (on a torus) for a time exponential in system size. This generalizes the recently-proposed idea of Floquet codes, where logical qubits are dynamically generated by a time-periodic measurement schedule, to a stochastic setting. When all types of bonds are measured with comparable frequency, we find a critical phase with a logarithmic violation of the area-law, which sharply distinguishes it from its Hamiltonian counterpart. The critical phase has the same set of topological qubits, as diagnosed by the tripartite mutual information, but protects them only for a time polynomial in system size. Furthermore, we observe an unusual behavior for the dynamical purification of mixed states, characterized at late times by the dynamical exponent $z = 1/2$ -- a super-ballistic dynamics made possible by measurements.

[1]  S. Vijay,et al.  Monitored quantum dynamics and the Kitaev spin liquid , 2022, Physical Review B.

[2]  M. Hastings,et al.  Adiabatic paths of Hamiltonians, symmetries of topological order, and automorphism codes , 2022, Physical Review B.

[3]  M. Hastings,et al.  Performance of Planar Floquet Codes with Majorana-Based Qubits , 2022, PRX Quantum.

[4]  S. Flammia,et al.  Clifford-deformed Surface Codes , 2022, 2201.07802.

[5]  D. Huse,et al.  Field Theory of Charge Sharpening in Symmetric Monitored Quantum Circuits. , 2021, Physical review letters.

[6]  A. Potter,et al.  Entanglement dynamics in hybrid quantum circuits , 2021, 2111.08018.

[7]  M. Hastings,et al.  Boundaries for the Honeycomb Code , 2021, Quantum.

[8]  A. Fowler,et al.  A Fault-Tolerant Honeycomb Memory , 2021, Quantum.

[9]  Matthew A. Fisher,et al.  Decodable hybrid dynamics of open quantum systems with Z2 symmetry , 2021, Physical Review B.

[10]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Entanglement and Charge-Sharpening Transitions in U(1) Symmetric Monitored Quantum Circuits , 2021, Physical Review X.

[11]  M. Hastings,et al.  Dynamically Generated Logical Qubits , 2021, Quantum.

[12]  N. Yao,et al.  Measurement-Induced Transition in Long-Range Interacting Quantum Circuits. , 2021, Physical review letters.

[13]  Tibor Rakovszky,et al.  Fractal, Logarithmic, and Volume-Law Entangled Nonthermal Steady States via Spacetime Duality , 2021, Physical Review X.

[14]  Soonwon Choi,et al.  Symmetry enriched phases of quantum circuits , 2021, Annals of Physics.

[15]  Steven T. Flammia,et al.  Free Fermions Behind the Disguise , 2020, Communications in Mathematical Physics.

[16]  M. Hastings,et al.  How Dynamical Quantum Memories Forget , 2020, Quantum.

[17]  M. Dalmonte,et al.  Measurement-induced criticality in (2+1) -dimensional hybrid quantum circuits , 2020, 2007.02970.

[18]  H. Büchler,et al.  Entanglement transition in the projective transverse field Ising model , 2020, 2006.09748.

[19]  H. Schomerus,et al.  Universality of Entanglement Transitions from Stroboscopic to Continuous Measurements. , 2020, Physical review letters.

[20]  D. Huse,et al.  Entanglement Phase Transitions in Measurement-Only Dynamics , 2020, Physical Review X.

[21]  T. Hsieh,et al.  Measurement-protected quantum phases , 2020, Physical Review Research.

[22]  M. Barkeshli,et al.  Measurement-induced topological entanglement transitions in symmetric random quantum circuits , 2020, Nature Physics.

[23]  A. Ludwig,et al.  Conformal invariance and quantum nonlocality in critical hybrid circuits , 2020, Physical Review B.

[24]  S. Flammia,et al.  Characterization of solvable spin models via graph invariants , 2020, Quantum.

[25]  A. Nahum,et al.  Entanglement and dynamics of diffusion-annihilation processes with Majorana defects , 2019, 1911.11169.

[26]  D. Huse,et al.  Critical properties of the measurement-induced transition in random quantum circuits , 2019, Physical Review B.

[27]  X. Qi,et al.  Quantum Error Correction in Scrambling Dynamics and Measurement-Induced Phase Transition. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[28]  D. Huse,et al.  Scalable Probes of Measurement-Induced Criticality. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[29]  D. Huse,et al.  Dynamical Purification Phase Transition Induced by Quantum Measurements , 2019, Physical Review X.

[30]  Rahul Roy,et al.  Topology and Broken Symmetry in Floquet Systems , 2019, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics.

[31]  Matthew P. A. Fisher,et al.  Measurement-driven entanglement transition in hybrid quantum circuits , 2019, Physical Review B.

[32]  Amos Chan,et al.  Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics , 2018, Physical Review B.

[33]  Brian Skinner,et al.  Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions in the Dynamics of Entanglement , 2018, Physical Review X.

[34]  Immanuel Bloch,et al.  Colloquium : Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement , 2018, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[35]  R. Nandkishore,et al.  Fractons , 2018, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics.

[36]  Roderich Moessner,et al.  Phase Structure of Driven Quantum Systems. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[37]  Jeongwan Haah,et al.  A New Kind of Topological Quantum Order: A Dimensional Hierarchy of Quasiparticles Built from Stationary Excitations , 2015, 1505.02576.

[38]  Michael Levin,et al.  Anomalous edge states and the bulk-edge correspondence for periodically-driven two dimensional systems , 2012, 1212.3324.

[39]  J. Eisert,et al.  Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy , 2010 .

[40]  X. Qi,et al.  Entanglement entropy and entanglement spectrum of the Kitaev model. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[41]  H. Bombin,et al.  Topological subsystem codes , 2009, 0908.4246.

[42]  V. Vedral,et al.  Entanglement in many-body systems , 2007, quant-ph/0703044.

[43]  Metod Saniga,et al.  On the Pauli graphs on N-qudits , 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[44]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Subsystem fault tolerance with the Bacon-Shor code. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[45]  J. Preskill,et al.  Topological entanglement entropy. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[46]  D. Poulin Stabilizer formalism for operator quantum error correction. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[47]  Alexei Kitaev,et al.  Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond , 2005, cond-mat/0506438.

[48]  D. Bacon Operator quantum error-correcting subsystems for self-correcting quantum memories , 2005, quant-ph/0506023.

[49]  Scott Aaronson,et al.  Improved Simulation of Stabilizer Circuits , 2004, ArXiv.

[50]  Shengjun Wu,et al.  What is quantum entanglement , 2003 .

[51]  J. Preskill,et al.  Topological quantum memory , 2001, quant-ph/0110143.

[52]  A. Kitaev,et al.  Fault tolerant quantum computation by anyons , 1997, quant-ph/9707021.

[53]  Gottesman,et al.  Class of quantum error-correcting codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[54]  Shor,et al.  Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[55]  Kennedy,et al.  Rigorous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferromagnets. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[56]  D. W. Robinson,et al.  The finite group velocity of quantum spin systems , 1972 .

[57]  Honghui Zhou Fractal , 2019, Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Security in Cloud Computing - SCC '19.

[58]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.

[59]  D. Abanin Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement , 2019 .

[60]  H. Kleinert,et al.  Critical Properties of , 2001 .

[61]  and as an in , 2022 .