Social tags: meaning and suggestions

This paper aims to quantify two common assumptions about social tagging: (1) that tags are "meaningful" and (2) that the tagging process is influenced by tag suggestions. For (1), we analyze the semantic properties of tags and the relationship between the tags and the content of the tagged page. Our analysis is based on a corpus of search keywords, contents, titles, and tags applied to several thousand popular Web pages. Among other results, we find that the more popular tags of a page tend to be the more meaningful ones. For (2), we develop a model of how the influence of tag suggestions can be measured. From a user study with over 4,000 participants, we conclude that roughly one third of the tag applications may be induced by the suggestions. Our results would be of interest for designers of social tagging systems and are a step towards understanding how to best leverage social tags for applications such as search and information extraction.

[1]  Peter Mika.  Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics , 2005, International Semantic Web Conference.

[2]  M. Vojnovic,et al.  Ranking and Suggesting Tags in Collaborative Tagging Applications 1 , 2007 .

[3]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[4]  Gerhard Weikum,et al.  WWW 2007 / Track: Semantic Web Session: Ontologies ABSTRACT YAGO: A Core of Semantic Knowledge , 2022 .

[5]  Jianchang Mao,et al.  Towards the Semantic Web: Collaborative Tag Suggestions , 2006 .

[6]  D. Boes.  On the Estimation of Mixing Distributions , 1966 .

[7]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents , 2000, SIGIR '00.

[8]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems , 2005, ArXiv.

[9]  Matei Ripeanu,et al.  Tracking User Attention in Collaborative Tagging Communities , 2007, CAMA.

[10]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Augmented Social Cognition , 2008, AAAI Spring Symposium: Social Information Processing.

[11]  S. Griffis.  EDITOR , 1997, Journal of Navigation.

[12]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[13]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Studying the use of popular destinations to enhance web search interaction , 2007, SIGIR.

[14]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Kevin S. McCurley,et al.  Analysis of anchor text for web search , 2003, SIGIR.

[16]  John Riedl,et al.  tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution , 2006, CSCW '06.

[17]  Gerhard Weikum,et al.  Combining linguistic and statistical analysis to extract relations from web documents , 2006, KDD '06.

[18]  John Riedl,et al.  The quest for quality tags , 2007, GROUP.