Deterministic mutation rate variation in the human genome.

Several studies of substitution rate variation have indicated that the local mutation rate varies over the mammalian genome. In the present study, we show significant variation in substitution rates within the noncoding part of the human genome using 4.7 Mb of human-chimpanzee pairwise comparisons. Moreover, we find a significant positive covariation of lineage-specific chimpanzee and human local substitution rates, and very similar mean substitution rates down the two lineages. The substitution rate variation is probably not caused by selection or biased gene conversion, and so we conclude that mutation rates vary deterministically across the noncoding nonrepetitive regions of the human genome. We also show that noncoding substitution rates are significantly affected by G+C base composition, partly because the base composition is not at equilibrium.

[1]  A. Eyre-Walker,et al.  Evidence of selection on silent site base composition in mammals: potential implications for the evolution of isochores and junk DNA. , 1999, Genetics.

[2]  A. Eyre-Walker.  Differentiating between selection and mutation bias. , 1997, Genetics.

[3]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[4]  M. Nachman,et al.  Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans. , 2000, Genetics.

[5]  S. Boissinot,et al.  Mutation Pattern Variation Among Regions of the Primate Genome , 1997, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[6]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  L. Pennacchio,et al.  Genomic strategies to identify mammalian regulatory sequences , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[8]  M. Gouy,et al.  Inferring pattern and process: maximum-likelihood implementation of a nonhomogeneous model of DNA sequence evolution for phylogenetic analysis. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  L. Hurst,et al.  Local similarity in evolutionary rates extends over whole chromosomes in human-rodent and mouse-rat comparisons: implications for understanding the mechanistic basis of the male mutation bias. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  S. Eddy.  Non–coding RNA genes and the modern RNA world , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  M H Meisler.  Evolutionarily conserved noncoding DNA in the human genome: how much and what for? , 2001, Genome research.

[12]  Laurence D. Hurst,et al.  The evolution of isochores , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Mutation rates in mammalian genomes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Hong-Seog Park,et al.  Construction and Analysis of a Human-Chimpanzee Comparative Clone Map , 2002, Science.

[15]  P. Sharp,et al.  Chromosomal location effects on gene sequence evolution in mammals , 1999, Current Biology.

[16]  W. Li,et al.  Genomic divergence between human and chimpanzee estimated from large-scale alignments of genomic sequences. , 2001, The Journal of heredity.

[17]  L. Hurst,et al.  Covariation of GC content and the silent site substitution rate in rodents: implications for methodology and for the evolution of isochores. , 2000, Gene.

[18]  Laurent Duret,et al.  Expected Relationship Between the Silent Substitution Rate and the GC Content: Implications for the Evolution of Isochores , 2002, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[19]  Feng-Chi Chen,et al.  Genomic divergences between humans and other hominoids and the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  A. Eyre-Walker,et al.  Synonymous codon bias is not caused by mutation bias in G+C-rich genes in humans. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[21]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome , 1989, Nature.

[22]  Burkhard Morgenstern,et al.  DIALIGN2: Improvement of the segment to segment approach to multiple sequence alignment , 1999, German Conference on Bioinformatics.

[23]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  T. Jukes.  CHAPTER 24 – Evolution of Protein Molecules , 1969 .

[25]  L. Hurst,et al.  The proteins of linked genes evolve at similar rates , 2000, Nature.