R&D Funding Sources and University Technology Transfer: What Is Stimulating Universities to Be More Entrepreneurial?

In recent years, universities have become increasingly entrepreneurial as evidenced by their rapid escalation into technology transfer, the process by which university-developed technologies are commercialized. Stimulated in part by a favorable policy environment for patenting and licensing as well as increased competition for limited resources, university commercially oriented activities are nevertheless risky and controversial. Yet, it is unlikely this trend will be reversed, and hence research to inform its responsible practice is needed. This study investigates the effect of core R&D resources on university licensing to small and large companies, two important but distinct forms of licensing activity. Implications of the findings for policy and practice are offered.

[1]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations , 1998 .

[2]  David L. Deeds,et al.  The impact of firmspecific capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offering: Evidence from the biotechnology industry , 1997 .

[3]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[4]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[5]  R. Pouder,et al.  Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation , 1996 .

[6]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[7]  Jennifer Washburn,et al.  The Kept University. , 2000 .

[8]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[9]  R. Heck,et al.  Academic Deans and Directors: Assessing Their Effectiveness from Individual and Institutional Perspectives , 2003 .

[10]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[11]  David V. Gibson,et al.  University Spin-off Companies: Economic Development, Faculty Entrepreneurs, and Technology Transfer , 1993 .

[12]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Inching toward industrial policy: the university's role in government initiatives to assist small, innovative companies in the United States , 1995 .

[13]  M. Bray,et al.  University revenues from technology transfer: Licensing fees vs. equity positions , 2000 .

[14]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurs In High Technology , 1991 .

[15]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[16]  Richard Florida,et al.  The Role of the University: Leveraging Talent, not Technology. , 1999 .

[17]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Basic research and the success of federal lab-industry partnerships , 1997 .

[18]  Árni G. Hauksson.  The commercialization of university research discoveries : are university technology transfer offices stimulating the process? , 1998 .

[19]  Joshua B. Powers.  Commercializing Academic Research: Resource Effects on Performance of University Technology Transfer , 2003 .

[20]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurs in high technology : lessons from MIT and beyond , 1991 .

[21]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Clusters of innovation : regional foundations of U.S. competitiveness , 2001 .

[22]  Jacqueline Senker,et al.  Making sense of diversity: public-private sector research linkage in three technologies , 1994 .

[23]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[24]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[25]  Joshua Bryant Powers.  Academic entrepreneurship in higher education : institutional effects on performance of university technology transfer , 2000 .

[26]  Teresa Isabelle Daza Campbell,et al.  Faculty and Administrators' Attitudes toward Potential Conflicts of Interest, Commitment, and Equity in University-Industry Relationships , 1999 .

[27]  Larry L. Leslie,et al.  Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University , 1997 .

[28]  David M. Flynn.  A critical exploration of sponsorship, infrastructure, and new organizations , 1993 .

[29]  E. Mansfield.  Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .

[30]  M. Lewis-Beck.  Applied Regression: An Introduction , 1980 .

[31]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[32]  Irwin Feller,et al.  Social Contracts and the Impact of Matching Fund Requirements on American Research Universities , 2000 .

[33]  J. Fairweather.  Entrepreneurship and higher education : lessons for colleges, universities, and industry , 1988 .

[34]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Capitalizing knowledge: new intersections of industry and academia , 1998 .

[35]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[36]  Todd A. Finkle,et al.  The Relationship between Boards of Directors and Initial Public Offerings in the Biotechnology Industry , 1998 .

[37]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences--an industry survey. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS 13.0 Guide to Data Analysis , 2000 .

[39]  Frederick H. Buttel,et al.  University-Business Partnerships: An Assessment. , 1997 .