ORGANIZATION OF PREDATOR‐PREY COMMUNITIES AS AN EVOLUTIONARY GAME

We consider a simple predator‐prey model of coevolution. By allowing coevolution both within and between trophic levels the model breaks the traditional dichotomy between coevolution among competitors and coevolution between a prey and its predator. By allowing the diversity of prey and predator species to emerge as a property of the evolutionarily stable strategies (ESS), the model breaks another constraint of most approaches to coevolution that consider as fixed the number of coevolving species. The number of species comprising the ESS is influenced by a parameter that determines the predator's niche breadth. Depending upon the parameter's value the ESS may contain: 1) one prey and one predator species, 2) two prey and one predator, 3) two prey and two predators, 4) three prey and two predators, 5) three prey and three predators, etc. Evolutionarily, these different ESSs all emerge from the same model. Ecologically, however, these ESSs result in very different patterns of community organization. In some communities the predator species are ecologically keystone in that their removal results in extinctions among the prey species. In others, the removal of a predator species has no significant impact on the prey community. These varied ecological roles for the predator species contrasts sharply with the essential evolutionary role of the predators in promoting prey species diversity. The ghost of predation past in which a predator's insignificant ecological role obscures its essential evolutionary role may be a frequent property of communities of predator and prey.

[1]  M. Slatkin.  ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT , 1980 .

[2]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  The Influence of Naticid Predation on Evolutionary Strategies of Bivalve Prey: Conclusions from a Model , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[3]  T. Vincent,et al.  A theory for the evolutionary game , 1987 .

[4]  G. Bush,et al.  Genetic differentiation between sympatric host races of the apple maggot fly Rhagoletis pomonella , 1988, Nature.

[5]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[6]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  HABITAT SELECTION AS AN EVOLUTIONARY GAME , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  B. Charlesworth.  OPTIMIZATION MODELS, QUANTITATIVE GENETICS, AND MUTATION , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  L. Segel,et al.  Models of the influence of predation on aspect diversity in prey populations , 1982, Journal of mathematical biology.

[9]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A new evolutionary law , 1973 .

[10]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Coevolution and Stability of Competing Species , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Thomas L. Vincent,et al.  Predator-Prey Coevolution as an Evolutionary Game , 1987 .

[12]  Richard Levins,et al.  Coexistence in a Variable Environment , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Homage to the red queen. II. Coevolutionary response to enrichment of exploitation ecosystems. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[14]  P. H. Leslie.  SOME FURTHER NOTES ON THE USE OF MATRICES IN POPULATION MATHEMATICS , 1948 .

[15]  Jonathan Roughgarden,et al.  A THEORY OF FAUNAL BUILDUP FOR COMPETITION COMMUNITIES , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  On the Prevalence and Relative Importance of Interspecific Competition: Evidence from Field Experiments , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[17]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Habitat selection in slowly regenerating environments , 1986 .

[18]  R. Holt.  Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[19]  Jonathan Roughgarden,et al.  COMMUNITY COEVOLUTION: A COMMENT , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[21]  P. Abrams.  ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT AND NICHE SHIFT. I. ADAPTIVE SHIFTS IN RESOURCE USE WHEN THERE IS COMPETITION FOR NUTRITIONALLY NONSUBSTITUTABLE RESOURCES , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  P. Taylor,et al.  Evolutionarily Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics , 1978 .

[23]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[24]  M. Taper,et al.  MODELS OF CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT AND THE THEORETICAL ROBUSTNESS OF TAXON CYCLES , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[26]  M. Taper,et al.  ON THE COEXISTENCE AND COEVOLUTION OF ASEXUAL AND SEXUAL COMPETITORS , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  R. Paine.  Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[28]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  A Theory of Habitat Selection , 1981 .

[29]  J. Connell.  Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past , 1980 .

[30]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[31]  W. Rice,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION AS A CORRELATED CHARACTER UNDER SYMPATRIC CONDITIONS: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  T. Valone,et al.  The Optimization Research Program: Studying Adaptations by Their Function , 1990, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[33]  R M May,et al.  Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  W M Schaffer,et al.  Homage to the red queen. I. Coevolution of predators and their victims. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[35]  J. Gower,et al.  The properties of a stochastic model for the predator-prey type of interaction between two species , 1960 .

[36]  Thomas L. Vincent,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF ESS THEORY , 1988 .

[37]  Thomas L. Vincent,et al.  Strategy Dynamics and the ESS , 1990 .

[38]  P. Abrams,et al.  ADAPTIVE RESPONSES OF PREDATORS TO PREY AND PREY TO PREDATORS: THE FAILURE OF THE ARMS‐RACE ANALOGY , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  P. Abrams.  The evolution of anti-predator traits in prey in response to evolutionary change in predators , 1990 .

[40]  K Sigmund,et al.  A note on evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  T. Vincent,et al.  COEVOLUTION AS AN EVOLUTIONARY GAME , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  P R Grant,et al.  Ecological character displacement. , 1994, Science.

[43]  T. Vincent,et al.  Stability in an evolutionary game , 1984 .

[44]  Mark L. Taper,et al.  Quantitative Genetic Models for the Coevolution of Character Displacement , 1985 .

[45]  P. Abrams.  Character displacement and niche shift analyzed using consumer-resource models of competition. , 1986, Theoretical population biology.