CONSTRAINTS ON THE ADOPTION OF PSYCHOLOGY‐BASED PERSONNEL PRACTICES: LESSONS FROM ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION

Surveys of organizational personnel practices often indicate that techniques advocated by industrial and organizational (I/O) psychologists are used with less frequency than might be expected given their technical merit. This article attempts to explain this phenomenon by viewing the adoption of I/O-type personnel practices as organizational innovations that are subject to the mechanisms and processes described in the innovation-diffusion literature. It is argued that the adoption of I/O-type personnel practices constitutes administrative innovation and that such innovation is not strongly influenced by technical merit. Rather, imitation processes, environmental threat, government regulation, and political influence often dominate highly uncertain adoption processes. Recommendations are made for enhancing the adoption rate for psychology-based personnel innovations.

[1]  G. Milkovich,et al.  The Current State of Performance Appraisal Research and Practice: Concerns, Directions, and Implications , 1992 .

[2]  Steven F. Cronshaw,et al.  Why capital budgeting techniques are suited for assessing the utility of personnel programs: A reply to Hunter, Schmidt, and Coggin (1988). , 1991 .

[3]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Organizational Politics: An Exploration of Managers' Perceptions , 1980 .

[4]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Organizational behavior: linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  C. Perrow.  The organizational context of human factors engineering. , 1983, Administrative science quarterly.

[6]  P. Attewell.  Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[7]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Behind the Mask: The Politics of Employee Appraisal , 1987 .

[8]  F. Damanpour,et al.  Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of "organizational lag." , 1984 .

[9]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[10]  M. Beer,et al.  Developing the Competitive Organization: Interventions and Strategies. , 1990 .

[11]  F. H. Freeman.  Books That Mean Business: The Management Best Sellers , 1985 .

[12]  D. M. Akinnusi,et al.  Environment, Strategy, and the Implementation of Administrative Change: The Case of Civil Service Reform1 , 1984 .

[13]  J. M. Corbett,et al.  Advanced manufacturing technology, work design, and performance:a change study , 1990 .

[14]  E. Sisson.  Forced Choice—The New Army Rating1 , 1948 .

[15]  John W. Boudreau,et al.  College Recruiting in Large Organizations: Practice, Evaluation, and Research Implications. , 1986 .

[16]  R. Noe,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Relation of Job Characteristics to Job Satisfaction , 1985 .

[17]  R. Daft.  A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation , 1978 .

[18]  Timothy T. Baldwin,et al.  TRANSFER OF TRAINING: A REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1988 .

[19]  Alfred A. Marcus,et al.  Implementing Externally Induced Innovations: A Comparison of Rule-Bound and Autonomous Approaches , 1988 .

[20]  Paul E. Spector.  Higher order need strength as a moderator of the job scope employee outcome relationship: A meta-analysis , 1985 .

[21]  Jeffrey Gandz,et al.  The Experience of Workplace Politics , 1980 .

[22]  Y. Fried,et al.  THE VALIDITY OF THE JOB CHARACTERISTICS MODEL: A REVIEW AND META‐ANALYSIS , 1987 .

[23]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Who gets power — and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of power , 1977 .

[24]  David J. Teece,et al.  The Diffusion of an Administrative Innovation , 1980 .

[25]  P. C. Nutt.  Types of organizational decision processes. , 1984, Administrative science quarterly.

[26]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. , 1981 .

[27]  J. Kotter,et al.  Choosing strategies for change. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[28]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Health issues at work. Opportunities for industrial/organizational psychology. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[29]  Miriam Dornstein.  Fairness of Pay Incentives: Industrial Employees in Israel , 1990 .

[30]  Gary Johns,et al.  Substantive and methodological constraints on behavior and attitudes in organizational research , 1991 .

[31]  R. Walton,et al.  Work Innovations at Topeka: After Six Years , 1977 .

[32]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Technology‐led change: A study of the implementation of CADCAM , 1991 .

[33]  T. Wall,et al.  Outcomes of Autonomous Workgroups: A Long-Term Field Experiment , 1986 .

[34]  R. Klimoski,et al.  Predicting sales success through handwriting analysis: An evaluation of the effects of training and handwriting sample content. , 1983 .

[35]  G. Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Can graphology predict occupational success? two empirical studies and some methodological ruminations , 1986 .

[36]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Problems and pitfalls in using capital budgeting and financial accounting techniques in assessing the utility of personnel programs. , 1988 .

[37]  H. E. Brogden,et al.  The Dollar Criterion—Applying the Cost Accounting Concept to Criterion Construction , 1950 .

[38]  Terry R. Johnson,et al.  A Survey of Management Training and Education Practices in U.S. Companies. , 1988 .

[39]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  THE FUTILITY OF UTILITY ANALYSIS , 1994 .

[40]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Untangling the Relationship between Displayed Emotions and Organizational Sales: The Case of Convenience Stores , 1988 .

[41]  James R. Berkshire,et al.  Forced-Choice Performance Rating—A Methodological Study* , 1953 .

[42]  M. Fennell,et al.  Synergy, influence, and information in the adoption of administrative innovations. , 1984, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[43]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Determinants of Innovation in Organizations , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[44]  Eric Abrahamson.  Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations , 1991 .

[45]  Steven F. Cronshaw,et al.  A meta‐analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview* , 1988 .

[46]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  War and Peace: The Evolution of Modern Personnel Administration in U.S. Industry , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  Michael Aiken,et al.  Organizational Structure, Work Process, and Proposal Making in Administrative Bureaucracies , 1980 .

[48]  Gerald R. Salancik,et al.  Interorganizational Dependence and Responsiveness to Affirmative Action: The Case of Women and Defense Contractors , 1979 .