Spatio-Temporal Impact of Hand and Body Blockage for Millimeter-Wave User Equipment Design at 28 GHz

The recently proposed channel model by the Third Generation Partnership Project for fifth generation New Radio (5G-NR) systems at millimeter- wave carrier frequencies in TR38.901 provides a good starting point for understanding the impact of propagation, material penetration, and blockage in cellular access systems. With this backdrop, the focus of this article is on hand and body blockage which have a significant bearing on user equipment (UE) design and in the practical viability of millimeter-wave systems. Building on TR38.901, we first study hand and body blockage loss with experiments using a 28 GHz experimental prototype that emulates a 5G base station and a form-factor UE. These measurement estimates show that while blockage losses can be substantial, they are significantly lower than the agreed model in TR38.901. We then study the implications of these revised estimates on spherical coverage with the UE. For this, we consider two form-factor UE designs: a face design and an edge design. Our studies show that while both designs are generally comparable in terms of spherical coverage, practical design considerations favor the edge design over the face design. We finally report on the timescales at which blockage events occur and show that given the symbol periods in 5G-NR, it is possible to implement mitigation strategies to overcome blockage (e.g., switch beams at the UE from a blocked path to an unblocked path).

[1]  Katsuyuki Haneda,et al.  Finger effect on 60 GHz user device antennas , 2016, 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP).

[2]  Ashwin Sampath,et al.  Modeling and Combating Blockage in Millimeter Wave Systems , 2018, 2018 IEEE 19th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC).

[3]  Jesper Ødum Nielsen,et al.  Measured 21.5 GHz Indoor Channels With User-Held Handset Antenna Array , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[4]  T. Kurner,et al.  Analyzing human body shadowing at 60 GHz: Systematic wideband MIMO measurements and modeling approaches , 2012, 2012 6th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[5]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  A Flexible Millimeter-Wave Channel Sounder With Absolute Timing , 2017, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Vasanthan Raghavan,et al.  Millimeter Wave Channel Measurements and Implications for PHY Layer Design , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[7]  Katsuyuki Haneda,et al.  Total Array Gains of Millimeter-Wave Mobile Phone Antennas under Practical Conditions , 2018, 2018 IEEE 87th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[8]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter Wave Mobile Communications for 5G Cellular: It Will Work! , 2013, IEEE Access.

[9]  Kyungwhoon Cheun,et al.  Millimeter-wave beamforming as an enabling technology for 5G cellular communications: theoretical feasibility and prototype results , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  Ashwin Sampath,et al.  Millimeter-Wave MIMO Prototype: Measurements and Experimental Results , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.